Alteryx Designer vs Infogix Data360 Analyze [EOL] comparison

"Alteryx is quite easy to use, learn, and understand as a product."

"The solution is easy to integrate and user-friendly."

"The features I found most valuable are the preparation features – the Join and the Transform."

"I like Alteryx Designer's drag-and-drop feature, where you drag a component, configure it and quickly run it."

"The solution's ability to hold a huge amount of data in its memory is significant."

"Alteryx Designer is easier to use for machine learning models. However, I am not very good at Python scripts which you will need to make the machine learning scripts."

"I like Alteryx's browser tool because you can view how your data is handled live. There are many other valuable tools like transpose and the crosstab. You can quickly pivot your data, and there are connections throughout the database. It's so easy to create a connection. If you connect to sign apps or a more complex database, the tool contains all the tools you need."

"The functionality of drag and drop is the most valuable. It is a very user-friendly tool that can be understood easily. My teams also work with other solutions, such as Integration Services, and these solutions are very difficult for people who don't have technical knowledge."

"The drag-and-drop functionality makes it easy for business users."

"Alteryx Designer is not as fast as SSIS and is not good for large datasets. It also needs to improve database procedures. Though it is easy to use, it is limited in terms of technical aspects."

"Its price can be improved. It is too expensive for our country. Because of its high price, we can't sell Alteryx Designer in this region. We used to be their reseller partner. There is also an additional cost for automating the data and running the flows, which makes it even more expensive. It will be very good if they can let users automate the data for free. Other solutions like Tableau provide this feature for free."

"It would be simpler if they provided a component where you could simply enter some parameters and see the results."

"The conditional join feature should be improved."

"The product could offer more connectors and more databases with support for the in-database function."

"Alteryx needs to improve its web governance. The gallery you use to filter the data is something else that could use some work. For instance, if you have a report connected to a database and want to filter a specific user, you should be able to suggest a specific region or a particular year. I know that the Alteryx isn't designed for data governance, but that would be great to think about."

"Alteryx Designer overall should be easier to use."

"Alteryx could move faster to create a cloud equivalent of the desktop version of Designer."

"The memory processing needs to be improved because when you deal with a large amount of data, the interface tends to hang a little bit."

"Each license is something like $4,000."

"I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."

"It is too expensive for our country. We are a small country, so it is too difficult to sell this solution. With Alteryx Designer, if you want to automate the data and run the flows, you have to pay more money. We were trying to automate the flows, and we found out that people have to pay 600 more for this feature, which makes it even more expensive. We are a partner for Tableau, and we are working with Tableau Prep, which is like a mini Alteryx. In Tableau Prep, you can drag and drop and make new connections with the different data sources. You can make all the connections. You can also publish a source. You don't have to pay more money with Tableau. You pay like $5 per user per month to access it."

"I rate the product's pricing a two to three out of ten."

"Alteryx Designer is a very expensive solution."

"Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."

"The tool is priced high."

"I rate the price of Alteryx Designer a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The open-source version is free to use, although it has a limitation of two-million records."