Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs Google Firebase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
AI Infrastructure (3rd)
Google Firebase
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Charles Powell - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good security features for strengthened data protection
I am not going to speak to their roadmap. Amazon operates Bedrock as an ecosystem supporting third-party models. I am speculating here, but I am sure those third-party models will always be present. However, one must consider that Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock, since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers. They have done this somewhat for generative AI, however, in AgenTek AI business, the only foundation models we can rely on for scaling now are the Cloud 3.5 models like Haiku and SONNET, designed for low latency and complex AI business use cases.
Shravan Revanna - PeerSpot reviewer
Simple to get started with and offers integration features in multiple programming languages
The product provides integration features in multiple languages, such as Python, JavaScript, Golang, and all other languages. Google Firebase has documentation, which might seem a bit confusing, but one with decent knowledge can easily explore and get started with Firebase quickly. Before jumping into any cloud infrastructure, the tool should analyze how much it would cost to run the database. Google Firebase provides a certain number of reads and writes per day, which is approximately 40,000 reads and writes. If there are more than 200 to 300 active users per day, there will be plenty of reads and writes to the database. In such a case, one can't use Google Firebase and has to upgrade to Spark, which is where it is based on usage. The tool is fairly simple to get started with. Utilize all the features can get very complicated. One must be a pretty good developer who has a lot of experience to be able to utilize the best features. It gets really complicated over time. The basic functionality and basic usage are easy to use and easy to get started. There are plenty of deprecated versions, and frequently upgrading them causes inconvenience. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is the best solution in this category and is rated a nine out of ten."
"The integration with pre-trained AI models has been very beneficial, allowing me to quickly access powerful machine learning models without the need to build them from scratch."
"Bedrock proved beneficial for generating SQL queries, which helped in delivering precise information from the database."
"The most valuable feature of Bedrock is its security and the model's ability to modify vector dimensions easily."
"Bedrock offers various foundational models in one place."
"Amazon Bedrock is an artificial intelligence engine that allows me to upload analyses of the quality of customer support calls."
"Data encryption while in transit and at rest is managed through Bedrock account."
"The no-code application of the service is beneficial since it allows creating solutions without extensive coding knowledge."
"If I were to make a chatting application I would use this product because it is easy to learn and implement."
"The user interface is very good and easy to navigate."
"It's stable."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The product’s most valuable features are integration and hosting."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that its storage can be easily used in our mobile applications."
"We're able to use the solution in several processes."
"Firebase offers encryption out of the box."
 

Cons

"The user interface of Amazon Bedrock on the management console needs improvements. It's very bland at the moment."
"Bedrock could be improved by having an API that allows for easy integration with services outside of Bedrock."
"The advantage of Bedrock is not as an amazing enabler of AI platforms, yet we utilize it to deploy application services and microservices within Bedrock ecosystem and leverage prequalified foundation models like Claude and others."
"Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers."
"It would be beneficial if Amazon Bedrock could provide multiple responses to a query, allowing users to choose the best option."
"While working with Bedrock, I incurred charges that were not explicitly mentioned in the pricing documentation."
"It would be beneficial if Bedrock were optimized for hyperscale use to avoid needing a mixed approach with SageMaker."
"One area for improvement is in cost—it tends to be a bit on the higher side, especially for enterprise versions."
"What I hate most about Google Firebase is that it has many different versions and releases new ones frequently."
"The exploration of the functions within Firebase could be improved."
"They could add a session replay to better understand how a crash or bug happened."
"There was no way of knowing how the rise in traffic would impact the price."
"The product must support more complex queries."
"We had some compatibility issues with Elixir."
"As we are a small team, we have only utilized some features, however, all those features have been very useful, and there is no problem."
"The solution could improve by providing an improved SDK tool and automatic indexing for databases."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of using Amazon Bedrock is quite high, as I incurred unexpected charges amounting to $130 USD within two weeks without actually deploying the model."
"One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs."
"We are using the free version of Google Firebase."
"The moment you go into volumes, then you work on a pay-per-volume basis."
"The price is perfect and very clearly defined. The price during the trial setup is free and then you move to a paid service."
"The solution's price is based on the number of consumers."
"Google Firebase is an expensive solution."
"I rate the price of Google Firebase a four out of five."
"The pricing component is a bit confusing when it comes to what exactly you'll pay for, but I wouldn't say it's expensive."
"Google Firebase’s pricing needs improvement."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Transportation Company
10%
Computer Software Company
12%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The pricing and licensing of Amazon Bedrock are quite flexible.
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
Currently, I do not have any thoughts about what areas of Amazon Bedrock need improvement.
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
I am using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) mainly to do some analysis of customer support calls.
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure
We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...
What do you like most about Google Firebase?
Google Analytics for Firebase is the best feature of the solution.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Fabulous, Pic Collage, Shazam, SkyScanner
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. Google Firebase and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.