Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Bedrock vs NVIDIA DGX Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Bedrock
Ranking in AI Infrastructure
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (12th)
NVIDIA DGX Cloud
Ranking in AI Infrastructure
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

RodrigoBassani - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced integration and flexible architecture drive efficient business solutions
I have to gain more maturity to provide some improvements to Amazon Bedrock. I have a lot to do with the environment they already provided. For example, they are able to connect to any LLM solution such as Llama, Meta, Gemini, or ChatGPT. It is open; you just choose your favorite LLM solution, and you can integrate it into Amazon Bedrock. We have a lot of possibilities to do this integration at this moment; we just need to work on it, create more maturity, and then we can provide some enhancements that we can see on the solution as a whole. For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture. They wonder if they are providing some company information that can run away, and I think that is the challenge we have now. We need to find ways to work on it and make our clients' data secure. They are looking for that to guarantee that this is a great solution for companies that is also secure.
reviewer2309676 - PeerSpot reviewer
Versatile, well-built, and powerful
The initial setup of the DGX server was quite straightforward. We treated it like any other server during deployment. It went to the data center, where they set it up, placed it in the rack, and enabled it. The deployment process was familiar, using our standard tools like Foreman and Ansible. Since the operating system is supported, we didn't encounter any specific challenges. For deploying the DGX server, we typically need two people for software tasks and sometimes vendor assistance for hardware setup. The process takes about four hours, with NVIDIA firmware updates taking the most time (around two hours), and the rest dedicated to OS and Ansible deployment. Maintaining the DGX server is pretty straightforward. We treat it like any other server, with around 10% downtime, while the rest of the cluster remains up.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is the best solution in this category and is rated a nine out of ten."
"The integration with pre-trained AI models has been very beneficial, allowing me to quickly access powerful machine learning models without the need to build them from scratch."
"The most valuable feature of Bedrock is its security and the model's ability to modify vector dimensions easily."
"Bedrock offers various foundational models in one place."
"The valuable feature of Bedrock is its flexibility and comprehensiveness in what it's offering, providing parameters that we can change."
"The no-code application of the service is beneficial since it allows creating solutions without extensive coding knowledge."
"The most beneficial aspect of Bedrock is its pool of models to choose from, catering to specific needs."
"Amazon Bedrock is an artificial intelligence engine that allows me to upload analyses of the quality of customer support calls."
"The most valuable thing about DGX Systems is their super-fast connection."
 

Cons

"For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture."
"For companies in general, the main pain point or main issue related to Amazon Bedrock is security because they are not confident that all information is hidden by this kind of architecture."
"One area for improvement is in cost—it tends to be a bit on the higher side, especially for enterprise versions."
"It would be beneficial if Bedrock were optimized for hyperscale use to avoid needing a mixed approach with SageMaker."
"Amazon native models could proliferate Bedrock in the future. We would welcome Amazon native models to Bedrock since, if they are natively built by Amazon, they are tuned to SageMaker and other Amazon service layers."
"The user interface of Amazon Bedrock on the management console needs improvements."
"There is a need for improved documentation, smoother integration, and possibly reduced prices given the competition."
"I would appreciate a greater focus on agentic Gen AI applications in Bedrock."
"One thing that could be better in DGX Systems is their power consumption."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of using Amazon Bedrock is quite high, as I incurred unexpected charges amounting to $130 USD within two weeks without actually deploying the model."
"One customer paid around $100 to $200 per month, which was significant given their overall infrastructure costs."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
University
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
University
10%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Bedrock?
The pricing depends on the LLM model in use, such as the 1.2 Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ). Costs are based on the number of characters obtained in return. It follows a pay-as-you-g...
What needs improvement with Amazon Bedrock?
AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) could add prompt engineering methods to its services. Currently, there are no prompt methods, so we have to experiment on our own. If AWS provided methods, like...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Bedrock?
We are using Amazon Bedrock ( /products/amazon-bedrock-reviews ) for generative AI-related tasks. We utilize Anthropic Claude ( /products/claude-reviews ) LLM to obtain appropriate answers for user...
What do you like most about NVIDIA DGX Systems?
The most valuable thing about DGX Systems is their super-fast connection.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NVIDIA DGX Systems?
The prices for DGX are pretty high, and not everyone can afford them. We only have a few out of our total servers because of the cost. It would be great if the prices could come down in the future ...
What needs improvement with NVIDIA DGX Systems?
One thing that could be better in DGX systems is their power consumption. They have been making improvements, but finding the right balance between performance and using less power is a challenge. ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
NVIDIA DGX-1, DGX Cloud, NVIDIA DGX Platform
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Open AI, UC Berkley, New York University, Massachusetts General Hospital
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Bedrock vs. Google Vertex AI and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.