Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (4th), File and Object Storage (8th)
Amazon S3
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Public Cloud Storage Services (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 8.7%, down 10.4% compared to last year.
Amazon S3, on the other hand, focuses on Public Cloud Storage Services, holds 11.7% mindshare, down 14.5% since last year.
Cloud Storage
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Q&A Highlights

Jitendra Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2022
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Auto-scaling capabilities enhance file management while reducing downtime
The most valuable feature of Amazon EFS is its auto-scaling capability. It's really easy to configure EFS by just creating it and running a command to directly configure it with my servers. It supports unlimited use, and charges are applied based on the file usage at the end of the month. The solution offers reduced downtime and increased durability through its auto-scaling features.
Vagner Martins - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced data security with seamless integration and static website capabilities
S3 is a great service offering numerous possibilities. It allows for storing objects and files of various types. I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB. Despite being focused on security, I leverage features such as cryptography and integration with CloudTrail.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is scalable."
"Amazon EFS offers the flexibility of scaling as needed without requiring pre-provisioned storage."
"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is secure as it is used under VPC."
"Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS."
"The platform is highly scalable."
"The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage."
"The first valuable thing is it is scalable."
"Amazon EFS offers the flexibility of scaling as needed without requiring pre-provisioned storage."
"Amazon S3 is reliable."
"The most valuable features of the Amazon S3 are its ease of use and integration"
"Great for storing all types of data."
"The scalability of Amazon S3 is good."
"The integration with Cloudfront helps in fetching the static phase and default phases in case our actual service is down."
"The solution is good and includes all the features we expect."
"Feature-wise, Amazon S3 is the cheapest and it's reliable."
"The product is easy to use."
 

Cons

"Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs, using services like SSTP, and potentially being costly in a rate-shift context."
"The lack of transparency in the costs attached to the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product."
"Its deployment process could be faster while installing the Python package directly into the environment."
"Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS."
"The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required."
"There are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption."
"The deployment is definitely not an easy process."
"They could always increase object storage ability."
"We have cold storage here, and I think that's useful. When it comes to commercialization, it's cheaper to put data that you won't be using into the data storage. You only use a little bit of the data needed each day for your transition, so you pay less."
"The solution requires you to buy and use Amazon services."
"The console could be improved - it's not very user friendly for non-technical guys."
"The solution's pricing should be modified to automatically expand storage based on prior usage."
"Amazon S3 can improve by decreasing the overall costs."
"We would like to see improvement in the ability to moves files within this solution. At present the process is not straightforward, and requires us to download files to our micro service service before then uploading into the solution. In addition, the transfer bit rate for the process is very slow."
"There's a lot of complexity."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."
"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."
"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."
"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."
"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."
"The solution's price is mid-ranged."
"It's worth the price considering its functionality."
"The cost is based on the amount of storage required and if we exceed the data transfer rate across regions."
"The price is okay."
"The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
"With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
"I know it is very inexpensive compared to other solutions."
"The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
"The price of Amazon S3 should be reduced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Jitendra Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2022
Mar 31, 2022
Hi @Vipin Garg, @Oscar Mejia ​, @Shaban AL-Ahmad ​, @Nibrask Alambilat Kaniyat , @Marcelo Lucas and @Krishna Rao , Do you possibly have any answers to assist @Jitendra Patel ​with this question?​
See 2 answers
AC
Mar 22, 2022
It depends on the storage capacity you are looking for and expected data growth. You would need to ascertain these numbers before looking at backup volumes, and potential costs.
EB
Mar 31, 2022
Hi @Vipin Garg, @Oscar Mejia ​, @Shaban AL-Ahmad ​, @Nibrask Alambilat Kaniyat , @Marcelo Lucas  and @Krishna Rao , Do you possibly have any answers to assist @Jitendra Patel ​with this question?​
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
78%
Computer Software Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
What do you like most about Amazon S3?
We can easily connect to the AWS resources.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings. AWS provides solutions to monitor your budget.
What needs improvement with Amazon S3?
In terms of security, I struggled with setting permissions and access control initially.
 

Also Known As

No data available
S3, Simple Storage Service
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Amazon S3 and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.