Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
Users prefer Amazon EKS for cost-effectiveness and scalability over on-premise solutions, despite some opting for Google Kubernetes Engine.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Amazon EKS support is responsive and helpful, with quick responses; users appreciate premium support for complex issues.
No sentiment score available
We have a paid subscription that provides priority support.
Amazon's technical support is quite good, especially for those who purchase support services.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon EKS is highly scalable, efficiently handles diverse applications, and is favored for easy scaling in enterprise environments.
No sentiment score available
The ability to scale based on requirements by deploying additional containers is a strong point for Kubernetes.
It can scale very well according to needs, and it doesn't have any issues with scalability.
I would rate the scalability of Amazon EKS an eight out of ten, suggesting it has high scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
Amazon EKS is now viewed as highly stable and reliable for managing Kubernetes clusters with minimal downtime.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon EKS faces issues with setup, pricing, usability, and integration, needing enhancements in user experience and logging features.
Simplifying these will enable more people, not just those with strong foundational knowledge, to work effectively with these services.
There is room for improvement in the interface of Amazon EKS.
Amazon EKS could improve in its pricing model, particularly for medium-sized customers who might find the support costs high.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon EKS offers flexible pricing but is often perceived as more expensive than competitors, with costs varying by usage.
Azure Red Hat OpenShift is costly, but flexible pricing and discounts are available with strategic negotiations for better deals.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon EKS simplifies infrastructure management and application deployment with scalability, automation, AWS integration, and Kubernetes support.
The most valuable features of Amazon EKS are its scalability features.
Now, with the serverless option, you can deploy everything and AWS handles the infrastructure.
AWS EKS provides flexibility and scalability compared to on-premises Kubernetes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EKS
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (2nd), Container Security (15th)
Azure Red Hat OpenShift
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Amazon EKS and Azure Red Hat OpenShift aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Amazon EKS is designed for Container Management and holds a mindshare of 19.3%, down 19.8% compared to last year.
Azure Red Hat OpenShift, on the other hand, focuses on PaaS Clouds, holds 0.6% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.
Container Management
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Jigneshkumar Gadhavi - PeerSpot reviewer
Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process
With numerous tools and plugins available for EKS like Graphite and Prometheus, users can effectively manage logs and monitor performance. For beginners, it's essential to grasp the fundamentals of Docker and containerization and understand how containers operate. Once these basics are clear, the next step is to familiarize oneself with Kubernetes and container orchestration concepts. I rate it a nine out of ten.
John Sanborn - PeerSpot reviewer
Runs on every platform; makes it easy to adapt to Kubernetes
One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive. Another thing is that OpenShift has its own CLI, it has features in it that you don't have under normal Kubernetes. So if you're just a plain Kubernetes developer, you either don't know about these other features and you don't take advantage of them so you're basically treating it like a normal Kubernetes or there's a slight learning curve as you start to learn how the new CLIs work, the other options that are not available in Kubernetes. There is a learning curve; it's not high, but it's still there. That's another negative against OpenShift. If you're purchasing OpenShift on their OpenShift container platform, you will have to manage the master nodes. If you are using Kubernetes in AWS, Google, and Azure, you don't manage master nodes. It's not really a big deal. It's all part of the patching in OpenShift. People will start to say, "Well, I don't want to manage the masters." But I think if they actually see the process of patching an OpenShift, they would say, "Okay, it's not even worth arguing because it's so simple." Alternatively, the main three cloud vendors can provide OpenShift as a service.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Retailer
14%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EKS?
The product's most valuable features are scalability, observability, and performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EKS?
I do not have specific details on EKS's pricing and licensing compared to other services. However, in general, deploying in the cloud offers lower latency and high availability and reduces manual i...
What needs improvement with Amazon EKS?
* EKS incurs an additional management fee ($0.10 per hour per cluster) along with EC2 or Fargate costs.May be expensive for smaller workloads compared to alternatives like AWS ECS.Requires expertis...
What do you like most about Azure Red Hat OpenShift?
The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?
Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers m...
What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?
Regarding room for improvement, there's always room, but it's mainly about Azure itself rather than Azure Red Hat OpenShift. Azure is not as advanced as AWS in terms of supported services. AWS is t...
 

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

GoDaddy, Pearson, FICO, Intuit, Verizon, Honeywell, Logicworks, RetailMeNot, LogMeIn, Conde Nast, mercari, Trainline, Axway
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: December 2024.
824,121 professionals have used our research since 2012.