Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon EKS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Akamai Connected Cloud offers cost-effective infrastructure solutions, enhancing flexibility, client acquisition, and career opportunities for users and businesses.
Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon EKS provides superior data security, cost benefits, and scalability leading users back from GKE for positive financial outcomes.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Customers praise Akamai Connected Cloud support for its prompt, professional, responsive service with human interaction and personalized attention.
Sentiment score
6.7
Amazon EKS support is praised for quick responses and resources, though training issues exist; priority support enhances satisfaction.
They respond with relevant and easy-to-follow solutions.
Having to know what questions to ask is essential.
Upon escalation, AWS helped me find the root cause.
We have a paid subscription that provides priority support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Akamai Connected Cloud offers flexible scalability, ideal for small to medium applications, with easy upgrades but challenges in scaling down.
Sentiment score
7.7
Amazon EKS is praised for its robust scalability, efficiently managing resources with minimal pod interruptions during scaling.
The ability to scale based on requirements by deploying additional containers is a strong point for Kubernetes.
It can scale very well according to needs, and it doesn't have any issues with scalability.
Amazon EKS is effective for scalability, providing features for upscaling and downscaling resources as needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is praised for reliability, proactive communication, and minimal downtime, maintaining strong service availability.
Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon EKS is highly stable and reliable for Kubernetes management, with minor issues unrelated to the service itself.
 

Room For Improvement

Akamai Connected Cloud requires upgrades in security, global availability, performance, and features to match major providers' offerings.
Amazon EKS needs better stability, security, UI design, simpler setup, cost efficiency, integration, monitoring, support, and documentation.
The main area for improvement is the lack of a backup feature to the local hard disk or storage.
It would be useful to have the option to sort or group by tags on the domains page.
Simplifying these will enable more people, not just those with strong foundational knowledge, to work effectively with these services.
A UI could help generate config files, simplifying the process for developers who are not architects.
Currently, some third-party plugins, like certain network plugins such as CNI, Calico CNI, or Cilium, are not fully supported.
 

Setup Cost

Akamai Connected Cloud offers predictable, cost-effective pricing with reliable support, valued for its price-to-performance ratio compared to Azure and AWS.
Amazon EKS offers flexible pricing by CPU or machine type, cost-effective for large enterprises but costly for smaller ones.
I find Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode)'s pricing very competitive.
The pricing structure is beneficial for large companies who pay for what they use, but it is not affordable for startups.
 

Valuable Features

Akamai Connected Cloud offers fast, cost-effective cloud services with global coverage, user-friendly interfaces, and efficient server management.
Amazon EKS offers scalable, user-friendly Kubernetes management with multi-cloud support, seamless AWS integration, and enhanced security features.
Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is easy to use and has a fair price, making it accessible and straightforward, which is crucial when compared to other complex solutions.
Their support is really good. I can ask anything at any time, and they are able to resolve issues like reinstating deleted Linodes.
The most beneficial aspect of Amazon EKS is that it helps manage the Kubernetes master node, so I don't need to maintain the master node, including tasks like upgrading.
The built-in services ease management tasks, such as updates and security, leading to less manual monitoring and a more seamless deployment process.
The scalability is excellent, allowing us to efficiently handle customer experiences and improve operational efficiency.
 

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Connected Cloud (Lin...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (7th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (12th)
Amazon EKS
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (2nd), Container Security (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) and Amazon EKS aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) is designed for Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) and holds a mindshare of 7.2%, down 13.5% compared to last year.
Amazon EKS, on the other hand, focuses on Container Management, holds 13.8% mindshare, up 13.5% since last year.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
Container Management
 

Featured Reviews

Julio Graham - PeerSpot reviewer
Helpful automation scripts, good documentation, responsive support, easy to use and manage
The ability to fire up a virtual machine, use it, and then kill it, is quite a valuable feature for me. They have a lot of startup scripts, I think they are called stack scripts, whereby you can install something at a click of a button. For instance, you can install a whole server at the click of a button. Linode gives the users a lot of control. Another thing that I use quite a lot is their documentation. They have documentation on how to perform tasks and often, I use that to educate a client on how to do something or on how to maintain something, et cetera. This is because a lot of customers are used to simpler systems like an iPhone, where if you want an app then you just download it from a store, press a button and it installs, or press a button and it updates. The truth of the matter is that with servers and things like that, whilst people like the push button idea, it's a lot more complex than that. With these stack scripts, the people at Linode have thought about all of the things that a new user would not think about. They do all of that stuff and then walk you through it, and that's where Linode's documentation is really good. They walk you through what you have to do to secure a server, what you have to do to run a patch, or whatever. They've got all those sorts of knowledge bases of information, which I think is invaluable, especially for clients who are uneducated in these things. It's extremely important to me that Linode offers worldwide coverage via multiple data centers, for various reasons. One is that because we live in this global world, our customers are everywhere. Secondly, for people who need geo-redundancy, with for example a server in China and one elsewhere as a backup, it's great. It's also nice because if they were just US-based, I wouldn't be able to use them because I would need to go through a whole process of trying to certify the data integrity in other regions. I'm sure that most people wouldn't bother with this because of all of the EU laws and the UK laws around data privacy. The US's data privacy laws are far more relaxed than what they are on my side of the world. The fact that I can have a server in London means that I don't have to bother with all of that. My physical location of that server is in London and to me, it is really important. When you compare Amazon, they claim to have infrastructure all over the place but I think that the bulk is centered in Germany. Even if it is in a few different places, everything gets backed up to the US, which is a problem for a lot of people.
Rock Wang - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing complex environments effortlessly while focusing on growth
The most beneficial aspect of Amazon EKS is that it helps manage the Kubernetes master node, so I don't need to maintain the master node, including tasks like upgrading. This allows me to focus on business code. If using services like Fargate, I only need to maintain my workload, simply uploading code that will be deployed to the Kubernetes cluster. This is especially beneficial for startup companies that lack the technical resources to manage the Kubernetes cluster. Furthermore, Amazon EKS allows me to utilize Kubernetes cluster-level expansion. If there’s insufficient resource on a machine, the cluster can automatically expand to add new nodes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Linode?
When I started using Linode, I found its functionality easy to navigate, user-friendly and responsive to my needs. It provides clear reminders about services I'm not using, like DNS zones, which I ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Linode?
The pricing is competitive, rated an eight out of ten. Despite a recent price increase due to inflation, the value is commendable.
What needs improvement with Linode?
The Cloud Manager interface sometimes feels slow, particularly when accessed from Asia. Compared to the previous non-React interface, the current version could be more responsive.
What do you like most about Amazon EKS?
The product's most valuable features are scalability, observability, and performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EKS?
The pricing structure is beneficial for large companies who pay for what they use, but it is not affordable for startups. Offering a free version could help small companies.
What needs improvement with Amazon EKS?
There is room for improvement in making Amazon EKS ( /products/amazon-eks-reviews ) less error-prone when writing on the YAML file. A UI could help generate config files, simplifying the process fo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Best Buy, Panasonic, Giphy, Marco Polo, World Health Organization, Font Squirrel
GoDaddy, Pearson, FICO, Intuit, Verizon, Honeywell, Logicworks, RetailMeNot, LogMeIn, Conde Nast, mercari, Trainline, Axway
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: March 2025.
847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.