We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Kubernetes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has very good basic features."
"Through Amazon EKS, we can have the blue-green deployment very easily."
"The most valuable feature is the computing speed."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The stability is excellent."
"It's a faster solution to adopt on native applications."
"I like the scalability they're currently providing. Integration was very easy. It was a good experience."
"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the scalability."
"The most valuable feature is the support for Docker containers."
"Provision of a managed platform as a service."
"If you're switching from VMs to Kubernetes, you will see a return because you can pack more into the Kubernetes architecture using containers rather than VMs. You'll see some more savings on your infrastructure, as well."
"Scalability is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the Zero Touch Operations, which involves a new way of performing operations and support. We do not have to do maintenance, the operations are very simple."
"Offers a crucial feedback process"
"It is a very good solution for deploying microservices in an application. It has a lot of freedom in it, which makes it very interesting. It is also web-enabled. You can run services in other virtual applications and virtual machines."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"The dashboard needs to be more user-friendly."
"A cluster is required on-premises, which takes a lot of time."
"I would like to see a cloud setup bank management feature."
"Amazon EKS's vulnerability management of data could be improved."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"Amazon EKS needs to improve customer operations and technical support."
"The main thing to improve with Amazon EKS is the price. However, these services can be very expensive. For example, in countries like Turkey, the cost is too high. That's why we offer our cloud solutions locally. We developed hybrid solutions, but their prices are still very high."
"We would like to see more validation tools added to this solution, this would provide pre-deployment analysis that developers could use before publishing their infrastructure."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The dashboard, monitoring, and login need improvements."
"The support could be faster at resolving issues."
"I'm a beginner, and I recently started working with Kubernetes. As of now, I don't see any bugs. However, it would be better if it could be deployed without coding."
"The configuration is a bit complicated."
"The initial setup of Kubernetes is difficult. However, if you are used to the flow then it is easier. The length of time it takes for the implementation depends on the project."
"Having a thread dump and memory dump, and seeing how many objects were created would be useful."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Kubernetes is ranked 4th in Container Management with 73 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Kubernetes is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kubernetes writes "Container orchestrator that deploys our machine learning solutions". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Linode, Rancher Labs and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, whereas Kubernetes is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, Google Kubernetes Engine and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform. See our Amazon EKS vs. Kubernetes report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
