Amazon OpenSearch Service vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and VMware are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.5, while VMware is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.7% mindshare in APM, compared to VMware’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Read 5 Amazon OpenSearch Service reviews

1,271 Views
1,167 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Read 12 VMware Aria Operations for Applications reviews

1,558 Views
1,396 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon OpenSearch Service

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

VMware Aria Operations for Applications and Amazon OpenSearch Service are two distinct offerings in the enterprise application monitoring and search service domains. VMware seems to have the upper hand in data visualization and support, while Amazon excels in scalability and comprehensive search capabilities.

Features: VMware Aria Operations for Applications is praised for its comprehensive visualizations, integration abilities within VMware environments, and intuitive dashboards. Amazon OpenSearch Service is commended for its robust search functionalities, seamless AWS ecosystem integration, and extensive search analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest VMware Aria Operations for Applications could enhance its scalability, expand support for non-VMware environments, and improve alerting mechanisms. Amazon OpenSearch Service users desire better alerting mechanisms, simplified management interfaces, and increased ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Aria Operations for Applications users find the deployment straightforward within VMware environments and praise its customer support. Amazon OpenSearch Service's deployment is more complex but benefits from excellent AWS support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Aria Operations for Applications is often highlighted for its cost-effectiveness and quicker ROI, especially within VMware infrastructures. Amazon OpenSearch Service, while potentially more expensive, offers a scalable solution that users find worthwhile for extensive data analytics needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

35th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (30th)

VMware Aria Operations for ...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (29th), Container Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon OpenSearch Service is 1.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

VijayKumar27

Software Engineer at The American College

Effective as a vector store, serverless architecture but there aren't enough security features

The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing. Even being serverless, it incurs charges during idle times. For just holding data, you need to create a list. AWS should add an option to make data idle, so it won't include computing charges. They charge for OCU units based on the time the serverless solution is up, not on indexing or retrieval speed. Once the service starts, it starts getting billed. It would help if there were an option to limit computing. When using it as a database, storing data without frequent fetching would save computing costs.

Read full review

ToniLindberg

senior consultant at Virtual Consultants Sverige AB

Troubleshooting capabilities have improved application monitoring and support engagement

I can see what happens end to end, which is pretty beneficial. The solution has troubleshooting capabilities, providing a direct connection to knowledge base articles from VMware Broadcom. When I encounter an error, I can search directly within the system to see what solutions have been employed by others. It has a familiar interface, which makes it easy to get started.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service is excellent, rated nine out of ten."

"The business analytics capabilities are the most important feature it provides."

"Amazon OpenSearch Service has enhanced our organization's ability to store and search large amounts of data efficiently."

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

"I would definitely recommend Amazon OpenSearch Service to other professionals due to its fast and reliable search capabilities."

"This service already sorts data like vectors. They have classified the storage pre-defined."

"Amazon OpenSearch Service provides a managed database solution, so we don't need to manage everything ourselves."

"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."

"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."

"I gladly recommend VMware Aria Operations for Applications because it is cost effective and has commendable AI response capabilities."

"It has a familiar interface, which makes it easy to get started."

"The stability of Aria Operations for Applications has improved significantly over the years."

"VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers significant features such as real-time statistics, the ability to identify possible issues within the VM environment, and helpful heat maps."

"No issues with stability."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications pros

Cons

"The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing."

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

"The price is fair yet leans towards the expensive side. I'd rate it five out of ten with respect to capabilities vs. cost."

"We faced documentation challenges during integration after migrating from Elasticsearch to Amazon OpenSearch Service. Better documentation on integration, query handling, and a more user-friendly UI could enhance the product."

"They can enhance data visualization."

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"The implementation is a long process that should be improved."

"They could make it more easy to plug-in data so that a nontechnical person will be able to use it, like accountants or finance people. That way they don't have to ask us."

"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."

"I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases."

"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."

"An area for improvement would be more in-depth reporting, such as analyzing disk IO during business hours compared to after hours."

"The documentation and integration with Kubernetes could be improved."

"The return on investment is best suited for organizations that do not have the resources for a dedicated VM environment team. However, the cost of the product doesn't show significant benefits."

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the pricing as three out of five."

"The licensing costs are very high, particularly when you consider that we have to purchase a level 1 license for every integration, such as the load balancer, HAProxy, and the MSSP. And if you want to use vSAN, that's another license. Then, of course, Tanzu Observability has its own separate license."

"Different locations require different setups. In your terms, around 300 to around 400K USD."

"I don't have the details. In our case, there is a mixture in place. We have production usage, and we are also doing training for VMware. So, we also have a training instance. It is worth the money you would spend on it. That's because if you were to build all of this yourself by using some of the open source tools, then you would need a lot of time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon OpenSearch Service?

We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Amazon OpenSearch Service is a bit costly compared to self-hosted Elasticsearch due to the managed service pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?

One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling. The current configuration does not support automatic scaling based on server load, requiring us to manage the scaling manually. Addi...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

The cost of VMware Aria Operations for Applications is fair and reasonable compared to what we receive in support and packages from VMware.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

I find that there could be improvements in the support service response time, as the urgency varies unless specified as Priority 2 or 1 cases.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront?

Our primary use case for VMware Aria Operations for Applications is to enhance application monitoring tasks, allowing us to set up alerts for different components and send them via SMTP to a team d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Competitors

Grafana vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 13% of the time

Dynatrace vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

Prometheus Group vs VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Compared 6% of the time

More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service

April 2025

Download Amazon OpenSearch Service product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

March 2025

VMware Aria Operations for Applications report

Download VMware Aria Operations for Applications product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tanzu Observability, Wavefront, Wavefront by VMware, VMware Tanzu Observability

Overview

Amazon OpenSearch Service is often used for log analysis, real-time application monitoring, and searching large datasets. Users benefit from its scalability, ease of use, and AWS integration, appreciating its capability to handle high data volumes while providing efficient search functionalities.

Many users choose Amazon OpenSearch Service for its powerful search and indexing capabilities, real-time analytics, and strong integration with AWS services. Key highlights include minimal downtime, detailed documentation, and efficient data processing. Scalability and automatic scaling are standout features, enabling users to manage high data volumes seamlessly. However, there is a call for improved integration, enhanced stability, and better support. Some users find the setup and configuration process challenging and desire more customization options for security features.

What are the key features of Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Scalability: Automatically scales to accommodate data growth and workload fluctuations.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights and monitoring for applications.
Integration with AWS: Easily integrates with other AWS services, enhancing workflows.
Powerful Search Capabilities: Fast and efficient search and indexing functionalities.
Detailed Documentation: Comprehensive guides and resources to assist users.
Security Features: Flexible security options to protect data and manage access.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Quick data processing and minimal downtime.
Scalability: Ability to handle increasing data volumes without manual intervention.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface and management tools.
Reliability: Consistent performance with robust support for data management workflows.
Integration: Seamless integration with existing AWS services and infrastructure.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Amazon OpenSearch Service is implemented to manage and analyze large datasets in real time. Companies benefit from its ability to monitor application performance, analyze log data, and enhance search functionalities, leading to improved operational efficiency and decision-making processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is a powerful tool for monitoring and analyzing the performance and availability of applications and infrastructure in real-time.

With its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, visualizing and analyzing data becomes effortless. The real-time alerting system ensures timely issue resolution, while scalability and a user-friendly interface provide a seamless experience for smooth operations.

VMware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. Atlassian 2. Cisco 3. Databricks 4. DigitalOcean 5. Equinix 6. Fidelity Investments 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. Honeywell 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. JetBlue Airways 13. LinkedIn 14. Lyft 15. Mastercard 16. Microsoft 17. MongoDB 18. Netflix 19. Nvidia 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Pinterest 23. Qualcomm 24. Red Hat 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. TMobile 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.