Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Redshift vs IBM Netezza Performance Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Amazon Redshift's ROI varies; some see quick returns and enhanced sales, while others prefer their previous database.
Sentiment score
7.1
IBM Netezza Performance Server boosts business performance and ROI with faster queries, cost-saving compression, and platform integration.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.4
IBM Netezza's support receives varied ratings, praised for quick deliveries but critiqued for inconsistent response times and support quality.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.3
Users have mixed scalability experiences with IBM Netezza, citing limitations and suggesting cloud solutions for improved scalability.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
IBM Netezza Performance Server is generally stable, with rare issues resolved quickly, relying on solid queries and architecture understanding.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Netezza Performance Server struggles with scalability, real-time integration, interface limitations, and requires improvements in concurrency and cloud capabilities.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Redshift offers competitive, scalable pricing with a pay-as-you-go model, best for large datasets but costly for smaller businesses.
IBM Netezza pricing varies; seen as cost-effective for long-term use but expensive for high performance and proprietary tech.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Netezza Performance Server offers fast, scalable data analytics with easy migration, optimized queries, and integrated hardware for reliability.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Redshift
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)
IBM Netezza Performance Server
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Data Warehouse (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

Ved Prakash Yadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Works as a data warehouse system and collects data from different sources
In terms of improvement, I believe Amazon Redshift could work on reducing its costs, as they tend to increase significantly. Additionally, there are occasional issues with nodes going down, which can be problematic. We often encounter issues like someone dropping a column or changing the order of columns, which can cause synchronization problems when pushing data through our pipeline. It's a minor issue, but it can be annoying.
Shemal Gandhi - PeerSpot reviewer
A cost-effective data warehousing tool, but security features like TDE encryption are missing
The solution's maintenance is quite easy. One person is enough to maintain the solution. If you are using PostgreSQL as a database solution, then using IBM Netezza Performance Server is the logical choice since it is based on open-source Postgres. However, if you are using Oracle, data conversion can be tricky. So, in that case, you want to go ahead with Exadata. Overall, I rate IBM Netezza Performance Server a seven out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user232068 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 5, 2015
Netezza vs. Teradata
Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Educational Organization
74%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
3%
Insurance Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Amazon Redshift compare with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics?
Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different dat...
What do you like most about Amazon Redshift?
The tool's most valuable feature is its parallel processing capability. It can handle massive amounts of data, even when pushing hundreds of terabytes, and its scaling capabilities are good.
What do you like most about IBM Netezza Performance Server?
IBM Netezza Performance Server is a cost-effective solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Netezza Performance Server?
The solution has a yearly licensing fee, and users have to pay extra for support.
What needs improvement with IBM Netezza Performance Server?
Oracle Exadata's security features, like TDE encryption, are missing in IBM Netezza Performance Server.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Netezza Performance Server, Netezza
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual Insurance, 4Cite Marketing, BrandVerity, DNA Plc, Sirocco Systems, Gainsight, Blue 449
Seattle Childrens Hospital, Carphone Warehouse, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Battelle, Start Today Co. Ltd., Kelley Blue Book, Trident Marketing, Elisa Corporation, Catalina Marketing, iBasis, Barnes & Noble, Qualcomm, MediaMath, Acxiom, iBasis, Foxwoods
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Redshift vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.