Both IBM SoftLayer and Amazon S3 are comprehensive cloud storage solutions, competing vigorously in the cloud storage market. Many users prefer Amazon S3 due to its extensive feature set and performance metrics.
Features: IBM SoftLayer offers robust scalability, security features, and flexible storage options. Amazon S3 provides high availability, diverse storage classes, and advanced data management tools.
Room for Improvement: IBM SoftLayer needs better documentation, more intuitive management tools, and better user experiences. Amazon S3 would benefit from simplified pricing, enhanced user support, and better clarity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SoftLayer has a straightforward deployment process and more personalized customer service. Amazon S3 offers efficient deployment, detailed documentation, and broad support but less personalized customer service.
Pricing and ROI: IBM SoftLayer provides competitive setup costs, flexible pricing models, and favorable ROI. Amazon S3 has higher initial setup costs but offers superior ROI through scalable storage solutions and extensive features.
Data placed in an S3 bucket is replicated across availability zones in a region, ensuring scalability and availability.
Amazon S3 is easily scalable and performs better compared to other cloud storage solutions.
Amazon S3's automatic scaling has benefited me, as I don't need to plan storage requirements.
I appreciate its capability to create static websites and integrate with services like CloudFront, EC2, and DynamoDB.
Its stability and scalability are also impressive, as it allows for increased storage space according to demand.
The most valuable feature of Amazon S3 for me is static deployment; it doesn't charge much, and I can integrate CloudFront for DNS and routing.
The practice of protecting data could be more streamlined or mandatory.
An improvement could be associating the naming with personal accounts, allowing more familiar or desired names without conflicting with global conventions.
In terms of security, I struggled with setting permissions and access control initially.
Amazon S3 is highly stable.
Transitioning between S3 storage classes, like moving data from the standard class to Glacier or Glacier Deep Archive, has been challenging.
An engineer is assigned based on the severity of the issue.
I've used the free tier and haven't been charged yet.
S3 offers multiple classes, allowing you to move data to cheaper classes for cost savings.
It is somewhat justified due to the benefits, but there is room for reconsideration.
Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.
SoftLayer provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. Our customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.
Products and services include bare metal and virtual servers, networking, turnkey big data solutions, private cloud solutions, and more. Our unique advantages include the industry's first Network-Within-a-Network topology for true out-of-band access, and an easy-to-use customer portal and robust API for full remote-access of all product and service management options.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.