No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon Transcribe vs Deepgram comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Transcribe
Ranking in Speech-To-Text Services
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Deepgram
Ranking in Speech-To-Text Services
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Text-To-Speech Services (2nd), AI Customer Support (3rd), AI Sales & Marketing (6th), AI Scheduling & Coordination (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Speech-To-Text Services category, the mindshare of Amazon Transcribe is 10.8%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Deepgram is 19.8%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Speech-To-Text Services Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Deepgram19.8%
Amazon Transcribe10.8%
Other69.4%
Speech-To-Text Services
 

Featured Reviews

AG
Senior Software Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Efficient voice-to-text conversion enhances communication and advertising efforts
The valuable aspect of Amazon Transcribe is its ability to perform speech recognition and convert it into text. It's highly compatible with a serverless environment, making it easy to trigger the service and get results. Although no specific features handle diverse accents or dialects effectively, the scalability and ease of use are notable. It provides the best results for our needs, is highly scalable, and easy to manage. The service also benefits from cost savings, being a pay-as-you-go model with very reasonable pricing for audio transcription at $0.004 per second.
Arunkumar HG - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Architect & Hands-On Leader | Prototyping, Automation, AI/LLM Integration | 20+ Years in at Regalix
A Powerful, Adaptable, and Constantly Evolving STT Solution for Voice Automation
Honestly, Deepgram has been exceptionally proactive in addressing the primary area that needed improvement. My main challenge was with the real-time detection of when a user has finished speaking in a live conversation, which is critical for a responsive voice bot. They directly solved this by releasing their Flux model. Because Flux is a recent release, I haven't yet had enough time to thoroughly test it and identify new limitations. At this stage, any "improvement" would be more of a "nice-to-have" feature rather than a fix for an existing problem. The core service is already very robust and meets all of our current needs. What additional features should be included in the next release? ---------------------------------------------------------------- Looking toward the future, here are a few features that could add even more value to an already excellent platform: * Advanced Built-in Analytics: While I can get the raw transcript and build my own analytics pipeline, it would be powerful to have features like sentiment analysis, emotion detection, or automatic summarization offered directly through the API. This would save significant development time. * More Granular Speaker Diarization: For calls with multiple participants, enhancing the real-time speaker diarization (labeling who is speaking) to be even more precise would be a fantastic addition for creating detailed call analyses. * Tighter Integration with TTS: Since Deepgram is also expanding into Text-to-Speech (TTS), offering a more seamlessly integrated STT-to-TTS pipeline could simplify the development stack for creating voice agents from start to finish. * Specialized, Pre-Trained Industry Models: While the general models are highly accurate, offering even more specialized, pre-trained models for specific industries like finance, healthcare, or legal-which are heavy on specific jargon-could push the accuracy even higher for those niche use cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The results I get with Transcribe are near-perfect—over 99% better than what I have experienced before."
"AWS Transcribe is the most useful feature for us right now."
"We don't run into any issues with bugs or glitches."
"There have been significant efficiency gains, as direct implementation with the SDK code and deployment with CloudFormation was straightforward, making it profitable in terms of effectiveness and helping me present a minimum viable product to potential clients, convincing them to hire me."
"The results I get with Transcribe are near-perfect—over 99% better than what I have experienced before."
"The feature I utilized the most was transcription."
"Amazon Transcribe helps me not to fall behind in a meeting and not know what's going on, and I have the transcript at the end to help me figure out what was said during the meeting."
"Amazon Transcribe helps me not to fall behind in a meeting and not know what's going on. Even if I do, I have the transcript at the end to help me figure out what was said during the meeting."
"The ROI has been excellent; the cost is night and day compared to the cost of human transcription, and we're spending maybe a tenth of the cost we would if we were still doing manual transcriptions."
"Deepgram is able to handle large volumes of audio data without compromising accuracy."
"Deepgram has significantly improved our transcription process in terms of speed and accuracy, allowing us to efficiently convert verbal feedback into text, enabling quicker analysis and implementation of new features."
"The solution's Speech-to-Text conversion feature is really awesome."
"Deepgram's transcription stands out compared to other solutions primarily due to its speed and accuracy; those are important points for me because not all providers or tools handled Spanish well, but Deepgram adjusted perfectly for that use case, and we also chose 11Labs voice, a South American voice, which worked very well with Deepgram."
"The features that I have been using in the tool have been very stable."
"Deepgram's low latency transcription has greatly impacted my ability to deliver reliable voice agents and provided very good transcription."
"The speed of the solution for transcribing videos is good."
 

Cons

"I would love to see Amazon Transcribe have its own section or its own page about how to make adjustments if you're using it for accessibility."
"Amazon S3 offers something like uploading parts, where a large file is divided into smaller parts, uploaded faster, and later reassembled. A similar feature in Transcribe would really help, making it easier to upload large file sets without spending extra time."
"The UX and UI could be improved on the AWS console."
"Amazon S3 offers something like uploading parts, where a large file is divided into smaller parts, uploaded faster, and later reassembled. A similar feature in Transcribe would really help, making it easier to upload large file sets without spending extra time."
"There is a need to improve the processing of background noise. Sometimes, surrounding sounds are recorded and Amazon Transcribe does not process these well, creating clutter."
"I would love to see Amazon Transcribe have its own section or its own page about how to make adjustments if you're using it for accessibility."
"Several AWS products are originally built in English and not in other languages. There is room for improvement in creating more products in Spanish for Spanish-speaking countries."
"The UX and UI could be improved on the AWS console."
"We've had issues in the past where it generates the transcript, and a lot of the text is duplicated."
"Regarding improvements for Deepgram, I think the quality of the transcriptions could be enhanced, as the Spanish accent poses challenges, making it harder to transcribe some words, and considering additional accents from Chilean or Argentine speakers could improve the model's performance with local words."
"The traditional Speech-to-Text doesn't understand when the user is done speaking in bot conversations."
"The solution does not properly identify the number of speakers."
"Deepgram has a vast UI and a vast range of models, but there could be a simpler version for creating AI agents rather than providing a full-fledged platform for minimal use cases."
"Even though Deepgram has many customization options, I wish that Deepgram had voice cloning customization to a much larger extent."
"I would like it to be more accurate."
"Deepgram is currently restricted to only the English variants, but it should include other languages, such as German or French."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the price on the standard is better for Amazon Transcribe than it is for Amazon Polly."
"When using Deepgram, one needs to pay for the hours or minutes for which the transcription is needed."
"The solution’s pricing is cheap."
"Deepgram is a cheap solution."
"The pricing is moderate."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Speech-To-Text Services solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Educational Organization
10%
Construction Company
8%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Transcribe?
The pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective, with pricing for audio transcription around $0.004 per second.
What needs improvement with Amazon Transcribe?
There is a need to improve the processing of background noise. Sometimes, surrounding sounds are recorded and Amazon Transcribe does not process these well, creating clutter. Adding functionality t...
What is your primary use case for Amazon Transcribe?
We are using Amazon Transcribe ( /products/amazon-transcribe-reviews ) to convert voice to text. For example, we communicate over the phone, record the call, and then convert the conversation into ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Deepgram?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as I found it to be cheaper without any problems.
What needs improvement with Deepgram?
Even though Deepgram has many customization options, I wish that Deepgram had voice cloning customization to a much larger extent. I also wish that the price were a bit lower if possible.
What is your primary use case for Deepgram?
My main purpose for Deepgram was to convert meeting voices to text very easily, and the other purpose was for content creation. I mostly use Deepgram for those two purposes.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Echo360, VidMob, RingDNA, Isentia
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Transcribe vs. Deepgram and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.