Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Flink vs Confluent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Users primarily depend on Apache Flink's community support and resources, occasionally opting for paid services for critical issues.
Sentiment score
7.0
Confluent's customer service is praised for responsiveness and efficiency, though some users desire improved guidance and best practices.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Confluent efficiently scales across diverse industries, handling high data volumes, but faces challenges in multi-cloud and scaling down.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
Confluent is generally stable with few bugs, but occasional outages occur, especially during Azure integration and maintenance.
 

Room For Improvement

Confluent requires enhanced plugins, usability, integration, security, documentation, cost management, search, governance, and tool expansion for improved user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Confluent's pricing is seen as high and inflexible, with larger organizations favoring open-source alternatives for cost efficiency.
 

Valuable Features

Confluent offers scalability, easy navigation, integrations, real-time streaming, customization, and user-friendly management, with strong support and documentation.
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Flink
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Confluent
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Apache Flink is 12.1%, up from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Confluent is 9.1%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Sunil  Morya - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy and manage; lacking simple integration with Amazon products
The issue we had with Flink was that when you had to refer the schema into the input data stream, it had to be done directly into code. The XLS format where the schema is stored, had to be stored in Python. If the schema changes, you have to redeploy Flink because the basic tasks and jobs are already running. That's one disadvantage. Another was a restriction with Amazon's CloudFormation templates which don't allow for direct deployment in the private subnet. You have to deploy into the public subnet and then from the Amazon console, specify a different private subnet that requires a lot of settings. In general, the integration with Amazon products was not good and was very time-consuming. I'd like to think that has changed.
Gustavo-Barbosa Dos Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming
Implementing Confluent's schema registry has significantly enhanced our organization's data quality assurance. It helps us understand the various requirements of multiple customers and validates the information for different versions. We can automate the tasks using Confluent Kafka. Thus, it guarantees us the data quality and maintains the integrity of message contracts.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Flink?
The product helps us to create both simple and complex data processing tasks. Over time, it has facilitated integration and navigation across multiple data sources tailored to each client's needs. ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Flink?
The solution is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with Apache Flink?
There are more libraries that are missing and also maybe more capabilities for machine learning. It could have a friendly user interface for pipeline configuration, deployment, and monitoring.
What do you like most about Confluent?
I find Confluent's Kafka Connectors and Kafka Streams invaluable for my use cases because they simplify real-time data processing and ETL tasks by providing reliable, pre-packaged connectors and to...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Confluent?
Regarding pricing, I think Confluent is a premium product, but it's hard for me to say definitively if it's overly expensive. We're still trying to understand if the features and reduced maintenanc...
What needs improvement with Confluent?
One area we've identified that could be improved is the governance and access control to the Kafka topics. We've found some limitations, like a threshold of 10,000 rules per cluster, that make it c...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Flink
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LogRhythm, Inc., Inter-American Development Bank, Scientific Technologies Corporation, LotLinx, Inc., Benevity, Inc.
ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Flink vs. Confluent and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.