Apiary vs Apigee comparison

Oracle and Google are both solutions in the API Management category. Oracle is ranked #35, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 0.3% mindshare in APIM, compared to Google’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Google users who would recommend it.

Apiary

Read 4 Apiary reviews

398 Views
285 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apigee

Read 86 Apigee reviews

22,229 Views
17,032 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Apiary

Apigee

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apigee and Apiary are prominent competitors in the API management platform space. Apigee stands out in deployment and customer support, yet Apiary excels in features and perceived value-for-money.

Features: Apigee offers comprehensive analytics, API security, and traffic management, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive API management needs. Apiary provides tools focused on API design, mock servers, and documentation, creating an intuitive experience for developers.

Room for Improvement: Apigee can enhance user accessibility and streamline integration processes. Its pricing structure may not cater well to smaller teams. Apiary might benefit from expanding enterprise-level capabilities and improving its support services. Additionally, enhancing analytics and reporting tools would provide a competitive edge.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee's streamlined deployment process and robust customer support appeal to large enterprises requiring strong integration. Apiary prioritizes simple and speedy deployment, fitting smaller organizations with minimal infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: Apigee has higher initial setup costs with significant ROI for large-scale operations, attributed to its extensive features and scalability. Apiary offers competitive pricing with lower setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious projects, focusing on design-centric needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Apiary vs. Apigee Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Apigee

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apiary

Ranking in API Management

35th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apiary is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apigee is 14.5%, down from 14.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

Phil Wilkins

Enterprise Integration Architect at Capgemini

The ability to configure rules to check for consistency has helped

Apiary provides a free tier of the platform which allows a small group of developers to collaborate easily on the design of open source APIs. In addition to this, it provides mock endpoints allowing people to experiment with the API without depending or having to stand up a real backend. With our clients, using Apiary allows us to very quickly pull together an API definition (particularly when using API Blueprint). The whole API design process for the simpler use cases can be done in a relatively short workshop which makes it a lot easier to agree, publish, version-manage an API definition with suitable documentation. This can then be evolved and enhanced (particularly in the documentation aspects). With the ability to support Swagger (Open API v2 and introducing/ed support for v3) and API Blueprint makes it a very versatile tool.

Read full review

ShawkyFoda

Senior Consultant at Goverment

Provides high visibility and control with good traffic monitoring

Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability. The replication process between Master and Slave for disaster recovery takes too long. Dependencies on analytics impact the performance of the user interface, which should be separate. The complex setup process on-premises, especially with multi-node installations, could also be improved. Additional control in product declarations, based on operations like POST and GET, is needed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Git integration"

"Quick and easy way to share a new API design with teams."

"I find the generation of mock services very useful, especially when demonstrating for new consumers."

"In two years, there was one time the service was down for an hour or so."

"I do like the overall performance of the solution."

"It's stable."

"Easy interface to monetize and deliver APIs with very easy integration for third-party development environments/delivery."

"It is easy to set up. It is on Google Platform, and there are multiple deployment models they support, which is great."

"The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features."

"Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues."

"The opportunity for customization is really vast and it is a really good feature built into the product."

"The security provided by the solution is excellent."

"It accelerates development and deployment processes."

More Apigee pros

Cons

"Swagger (OpenAPI Specification) and Blueprint Support"

"I would like an integrated option to download a Swagger version of the definition."

"The Oracle release cycle is very bad because the patches only update once a year."

"The solution’s scalability could be improved."

"In terms of the functionalities of a typical API gateway, Apigee is actually doing its job, but when it involves integration with backend applications, which some gateways have, I don't believe it has this functionality. You have to do Java or do some other low-level coding before you are able to do the integration. Apigee has a lot of components, which means that management will be a bit difficult. It probably has ten different components, and all of these components leverage open-source utilities, such as NGINX. When those open-source vendors upgrade their utility, Apigee usually lags behind because they need to do a lot of tests and any required development in their own platform. They need to do rigorous testing to make sure that nothing breaks. Because of that, it takes them a while to upgrade whatever components have been upgraded by the open-source vendor that owns the utility. We've been chasing them for a particular upgrade for well over a year and a half, and they have not done that upgrade. It is creating a security risk for us as an enterprise, but that upgrade has not been done, even though the open-source vendor, the owner of the utility, has upgraded it a long time ago."

"When there is an update on a new version or an automatic update, you have to be present and double-check that the update is reflected in the environment with no issues."

"Better functionality for validating inputs and outputs would be helpful."

"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."

"Apigee's user interface could be more straightforward and have more options. Also, it would be nice if it were ready to work out of the box without so much configuration."

"What my clients don't like is that the on-premises solution is not being treated and maintained as well as the cloud solution."

"An area for improvement would be to provide more information while troubleshooting."

More Apigee cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is easy to get started with personal (free) accounts, but a subscription is required for additional features."

"There is a free subscription option to start and try the service."

"Apigee has several different licenses you can obtain depending on your needs."

"Apigee is subject to licensing fees."

"It is a bit on the expensive side. Its licensing cost is a bit high, and that's where we've seen people going back on their decisions."

"It is not suited for small companies. It's expensive."

"The price of Apigee could be less expensive. The solution can be purchased monthly or annually."

"Its price is reasonable for the features they provide and the maturity of the platform."

"If the budget is not a concern then I will choose to go with Apigee over WSA-2, but if it is then I would prefer the latter solution."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It's not for organizations in the early stages of their lifecycle but is more suited for mid- to enterprise-level platforms. Pricing varies by deployment model, with SaaS being the cheapest, costing around $100,000 per year for a subscription. For hybrid and on-prem deployments, the price increases. The on-prem model includes a license and additional installation and configuration professional service costs, which can be at least $40,000 to $60,000 for the initial setup. While it's not cheap, it offers long-term value and can be worthwhile."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apigee?

We can customize the dashboard.

See all answers

Comparisons

Postman vs Apiary

Compared 30% of the time

Oracle API Platform Cloud Service vs Apiary

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apiary

Compared 25% of the time

More Apiary Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 31% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Apigee

Compared 9% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

January 2025

Download Apiary product report

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

February 2025

Download Apigee product report

Overview

Apiary's pioneering APIFlow solution provides the framework and tools for developing application programming interfaces (APIs) that share enterprise services and data and help create modern, cloud-based applications and experiences. APIFlow spans the API creation lifecycle, including design, governance, testing, and documentation, while supporting API Blueprint and OpenAPI industry standardsץ

Oracle

Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.

Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.

The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.

Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:

Security: Protect APIs, messages, and backends with configurable policies such as OAuth, API key verification, XML/JSON threat protection, and access control.
API gateway: Secure and mediate the traffic between clients and backends, and between a company’s APIs and the developers who use the APIs.
Developer portal: Attract and engage application developers, enabling them to discover, explore, purchase, and test APIs and register to access and use the APIs.
API console: The console helps developers learn and work with APIs.
API lifecycle management: Manage the process of designing, developing, publishing, deploying, and versioning APIs.
Automated documentation: Automate the development of API documentation and software development kits.
Machine learning: Utilize machine learning and analytics to generate actionable insights and reports.

API monitoring: Apigee offers monitoring tools for API troubleshooting, security, and optimization.

Reviews from Real Users:

Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.

Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”

An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”

Google

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce.com, Bloomberg, GoodData, Viacom, Akamai Technologies, DigitalGlobe

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Buyer's Guide

Apiary vs. Apigee

January 2025

Free Report: Apiary vs. Apigee

Find out what your peers are saying about Apiary vs. Apigee and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apiary vs. Apigee report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.