Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AppDynamics vs Azure Monitor comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
AppDynamics enhances performance, reduces downtime, improves productivity, and boosts customer satisfaction with significant MTTR reduction and cost savings.
Sentiment score
7.0
Azure Monitor offers real-time insights and cost savings, particularly effective with .NET technologies, though some find it costly.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
AppDynamics customer service is praised for responsiveness and expertise, with some improvement needed in communication and response times.
Sentiment score
6.2
Azure Monitor support is inconsistent; some users find it responsive, while others note delays and limited expertise.
However, the second-line support is good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
AppDynamics scales well for most, despite some challenges with licensing, configuration, and performance limitations in large deployments.
Sentiment score
7.7
Azure Monitor is scalable, integrates easily, supports deployments of all sizes, but may require third-party tools for some features.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
5.6
AppDynamics is stable for most users, with minor issues and good support, effective for large-scale environment monitoring.
Sentiment score
8.3
Azure Monitor is stable and reliable, though users suggest further testing for alerting and configuration to enhance agility.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
 

Room For Improvement

AppDynamics users desire improved UI, mobile compatibility, integration, support, and simpler management, highlighting challenges in analytics and alerts.
Azure Monitor needs better integration, user interface, customization, visualization, cost transparency, network monitoring, and external tool compatibility.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
 

Setup Cost

AppDynamics' pricing is high and complex, requiring careful budget planning, especially for smaller businesses with limited resources.
Azure Monitor's pricing varies by usage; affordable for some, costly for others, especially impacting log analytics and storage costs.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
 

Valuable Features

AppDynamics offers comprehensive performance monitoring with real-time alerts, intuitive dashboards, and code-level diagnostics for enhanced IT operations.
Azure Monitor provides dynamic alerting, seamless integration, robust security, real-time surveillance, and detailed logging for comprehensive cloud resource monitoring.
The real-time feature provides me with insights into what's happening.
Resource monitoring is essential.
 

Categories and Ranking

AppDynamics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
157
Ranking in other categories
Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (3rd)
Azure Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AppDynamics is 5.2%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 9.5%, up from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Deshpande - PeerSpot reviewer
The transition tracing and user experience are good, but performance degrades past 3,000 or so agents
The Kubernetes cluster agent has not yet matured. That's one area that requires a lot of improvement. You have two options for implementing the Kubernetes agent. One is deployed in DocCloud, but you can't download those images from DocCloud for security reasons at most organizations, so this option isn't that useful. The installation for the second option isn't that user-friendly. Transition tracing for the Kubernetes application is challenging. You have to navigate to a new set of user interfaces in AppDynamics, so that's the pain point. There is an icon you need to click on to get a newer user interface.
Swapan Biswas - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement
Alerts cannot be configured to monitor at a certain point in time. For example, we might want to alert people at zero hours but that is not possible. Splunk can accomplish this and its alerts are far better than the solution's options. The alerting mechanism is not up to the market. The default interface should be improved. You can prepare your own dashboard by using custom query language, but the default interface is not good.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
831,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
50%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor could improve by adding capabilities for data observability and integrating more tightly with their data platform components.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AppD, AppDynamics APM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.