Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aranda Patch Management vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aranda Patch Management
Ranking in Patch Management
32nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...
Ranking in Patch Management
18th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Aranda Patch Management is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 1.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aranda Patch Management?
Share your opinion
PraveenRajan - PeerSpot reviewer
Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects
We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
825,609 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?
It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well.
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?
We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Grupo Aval, Credomatic, Zurich, Redeban, Interbanking, Cooperativa, Insurance Caracas, ACH, Mapfre, Sofisa Bank, Public Services of Heredia, Buenos Aires waters, Western Union, Pacific Airport Group, KPMG, Transantiago
InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLSoftware , Qualys and others in Patch Management. Updated: December 2024.
825,609 professionals have used our research since 2012.