Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Analytics vs CyberArk Identity comparison

OpenText and CyberArk are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. OpenText is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while CyberArk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to CyberArk’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Analytics
Read 15 ArcSight Analytics reviews
  • 272 Views
  • 106 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
CyberArk Identity
Read 23 CyberArk Identity reviews
  • 26 Views
  • 17 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

CyberArk Identity and ArcSight Analytics compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. CyberArk Identity seems to have the upper hand in user-focused security and identity management, while ArcSight is superior in threat visibility.

Features: CyberArk Identity offers strong password rotation, robust integration capabilities, and adaptive authentication for privileged users. It also provides extensive identity management and seamless UI integration. ArcSight Analytics excels in threat analysis with powerful log correlation, behavioral analytics, and a rich set of connectors for comprehensive network insights.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity could improve in Mobile Device Management, integration, and user-friendly design, with challenges in third-party integration and a steep learning curve. ArcSight Analytics needs enhancements in user interface, third-party application integration, and user-friendliness, with complexity and slow query performance being major issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity supports flexible deployment across cloud environments, with mixed technical support reviews. ArcSight Analytics favors on-premises or hybrid deployment, with generally good technical support, though longer response times are noted.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity is expensive but provides substantial ROI due to comprehensive security features. ArcSight Analytics is also costly, with significant investment in training and hardware, yet both justify their costs with essential security benefits for large organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,600 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
13th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CyberArk Identity
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (8th), Identity Management (IM) (11th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (9th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri - PeerSpot reviewer
It has improved our system and network policy monitoring
They should improve on the following: * Timely resolution of issues and proper support once a ticket has been generated. * Systems appearing on the network which are not part of the domain controller. These should be monitored. * Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked. * Logger monitoring should be separated from ESM monitoring. * Ability to integrate with cloud-based applications and monitor cloud-based events. * Ability to log and notify tailored rules via SMS/email. * Provide more ArcSight training and workshops.
Read full review
Julio Montero - PeerSpot reviewer
Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication
The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The correlation engine is good."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"This solution makes it easy to create use cases, and it is easy to move queries from use cases to the report to the dashboard."
"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
"The two most valuable features of this solution are its stability and scalability."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
More ArcSight Analytics pros
"CyberArk Identity provides identity governance and gives me control over who and how access to environments occurs, offering significant confidentiality in what is accessed."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"Overall, I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten."
"CyberArk Identity's ability to safeguard financial services infrastructure is good."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."
"The features that I personally find most effective in terms of security stem from the fact that it is easy to integrate and also the adoption is faster."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
More CyberArk Identity pros
 

Cons

"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."
"It needs more user analytics and aggregation user queries. And it's slow. When you query over ArcSight, it is very slow."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors."
"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."
More ArcSight Analytics cons
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"The product is not cheap, especially if you opt for an on-premise deployment requiring a complex server infrastructure. On the other hand, choosing the software as a service version simplifies infrastructure requirements but necessitates being online all the time."
"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."
"Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication. When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process."
More CyberArk Identity cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive."
"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."
"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."
"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."
"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?
My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?
The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?
The pricing point is very good. I compared it with other products, and it does not require a heavy investment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?
It does not have global market penetration, and sometimes, there are support issues. CyberArk Identity can definitely improve on the IAM rules when I create them. The stability can also be better.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 20% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity Logo
Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 15% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 12% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs CyberArk Identity Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs CyberArk Identity
Compared 6% of the time
More CyberArk Identity Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics
April 2025
ArcSight Analytics reportDownload ArcSight Analytics product report
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Identity
April 2025
CyberArk Identity reportDownload CyberArk Identity product report
 

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Idaptive
 

Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

OpenText

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

  • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
  • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
  • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
  • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity
April 2025
Free Report: ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Analytics vs. CyberArk Identity report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.