Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Security Hub vs ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.0
AWS Security Hub support is praised for its prompt technical assistance but could improve email response efficiency.
AWS ProLogitech Support is very helpful and timely, especially at the enterprise level.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.5
AWS Security Hub needs real-time scanning improvements, better integrations, enhanced compliance, cost control, and user-friendly features.
A more user-friendly experience programmatically in writing queries and configuring custom security rules.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Security Hub is scalable and efficient for multi-account operations but less effective in multi-cloud environments.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.0
AWS Security Hub offers flexible, cost-effective subscription models, appealing to enterprises for its affordability and included cloud security features.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
AWS Security Hub is highly regarded for its stability, frequent updates, and reliable performance, though improvement is suggested by some.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
AWS Security Hub enhances cloud security by integrating services, offering centralized management, real-time alerts, and compliance evaluations.
The most beneficial aspect of Security Hub is its proactive capability, allowing us to identify potential security issues before they escalate.
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Enterprise Securit...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (14th)
AWS Security Hub
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is designed for Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, down 1.8% compared to last year.
AWS Security Hub, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), holds 5.8% mindshare, up 4.2% since last year.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Ramnesh  Dubey - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods
The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.
CobusFrey - PeerSpot reviewer
Not only does it easily integrate with third-party tools but also allows auto synchronization of logs
AWS Security Hub has advanced quite a bit over the last couple of years. The features are quite rich now. Before purchasing, one should develop an understanding of the product. I believe AWS Security Hub is one of the most friendly solutions for integration with third-party tools. I find the integration of AWS Security Hub to be the easiest with tools from Microsoft and a bit difficult with Google solutions. AWS Security Hub is compliant in many different ways. The development business I am part of is SOC compliant for AWS Security Hub, while the banks our organization works with have been PCI compliant for AWS Security Hub for three years. I would definitely recommend AWS Security Hub to others, yet I would also inquire about their purpose and knowledge of cloud solutions. If you know how to use AWS Security Hub, it can be a great solution to work with. The solution is more suitable for people working in the cloud instead of on-premises. I would rate AWS Security Hub a nine out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.
Which is better - Azure Sentinel or AWS Security Hub?
We like that Azure Sentinel does not require as much maintenance as legacy SIEMs that are on-premises. Azure Sentinel is auto-scaling - you will not have to worry about performance impact, you will...
What do you like most about AWS Security Hub?
The most valuable features of the solution are the scanning of all the cloud environments and most of the compliances available in the cloud.
What needs improvement with AWS Security Hub?
AWS Security Hub could improve its guidance links to resolve findings related to multiple resources. The implementation of more guidance links could enhance issue resolution. Additionally, shorteni...
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
SQRRL
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.
Edmunds, Frame.io, GoDaddy, Realtor.com
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Security Hub vs. ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.