Trellix ESM and OpenText Behavioral Signals compete in enterprise data security and behavioral analytics. Trellix holds an advantage in pricing and support, while OpenText leads with its advanced features.
Features: Trellix ESM offers threat intelligence, network security, and advanced incident response. OpenText Behavioral Signals delivers predictive insights using AI to analyze human behavior, robust behavioral analytics, and enhanced human-centric data insights.
Room for Improvement: Trellix ESM could enhance its device coverage, reduce reliance on custom parsers, and offer better integration with all devices. OpenText Behavioral Signals might improve initial costs, streamline complex deployment in specialized environments, and enhance user-friendliness for non-experts.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ESM provides straightforward deployment and responsive support across multiple channels. OpenText Behavioral Signals ensures efficient deployment and excels in specialized support for complex behavioral analytics.
Pricing and ROI: Trellix ESM is cost-effective with strong ROI due to its comprehensive security features. OpenText Behavioral Signals has higher initial costs but offers significant long-term ROI through advanced predictive analytics capabilities.
I would rate support for Trellix ESM 10 out of 10 because if we connect with the support in the UK, we get excellent support.
It's rare for me to need them unless it's an issue with licensing, and they are the best in that regard.
Scalability is quite easier with Trellix ESM, because all we need to do is add more receivers to it, so it can go to any point.
If there is any device which is not covered, there should not be any additional charges for writing the custom parsers on that.
The weakest point is it doesn't cover almost all the devices, so the customer has to be more dependent on the parsers to be written by the Professional Services team.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Trellix ESM | 1.2% |
| OpenText Behavioral Signals | 0.7% |
| Other | 98.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
OpenText Behavioral Signals enhances organizational security monitoring with its robust correlation engine and streamlined dashboard, offering customization to suit different environments like airports or banks.
OpenText Behavioral Signals effectively integrates device logs through its strong correlation engine. The platform's customization options enable tailored alerts to match specific use cases, such as airports or banks. Although it needs more frequent updates to stay aligned with global incidents, it provides a centralized dashboard that ensures comprehensive visibility across networks. Users find the interface intuitive, making rule writing and report access easy, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the network environment.
What are the key features of OpenText Behavioral Signals?In industries like banking and airports, OpenText Behavioral Signals is implemented for gathering global intelligence from the cloud. It notifies organizations about global attacks and updates its correlation engines. These industries utilize the platform for monitoring and analyzing logs from network devices, security log management, and addressing network challenges like link failures and unauthorized login attempts, ensuring better security posture with behavioral analytics and log integration using Unix and Microsoft-based connectors.
Make your organization more resilient and confident with Trellix Security Operations. Filter out the noise and cut complexity to deliver faster, more effective SecOps. Integrate your existing security tools and connect with over 650 Trellix solutions and third-party products.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
