Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs Checkmarx One comparison

Arctic Wolf Networks and Checkmarx are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Arctic Wolf Networks is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.8, while Checkmarx is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.3. Arctic Wolf Networks holds a 1.2% mindshare in VM, compared to Checkmarx’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arctic Wolf Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Checkmarx One and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk are competitors in the cybersecurity domain. Data shows Checkmarx One leads in feature richness, while Arctic Wolf Managed Risk outperforms in ease of deployment.

Features: Checkmarx One offers robust application security testing tools, seamless integration capabilities, and an emphasis on developer empowerment. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk provides a comprehensive suite of threat intelligence, risk management, and asset monitoring solutions. Checkmarx One is strong in application security, while Arctic Wolf focuses on managed detection and response, excelling in continuous threat assessment.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve scalability for larger enterprises, offer more flexible deployment options, and enhance real-time threat intelligence updates. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk might expand its application security features, enhance integration with third-party tools, and offer more detailed customization for complex scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is known for its robust deployment options and supportive customer service, ensuring optimal integration within complex environments. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk features a streamlined setup and active support, providing comprehensive solutions with minimal deployment hurdles. Arctic Wolf's focus on customer service and deployment simplicity offers a competitive edge.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One provides competitive pricing with a focus on ROI through its extensive features. Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, although potentially requiring a higher initial investment, justifies this with inclusive managed services, promising substantial long-term benefits. The perceived value of Arctic Wolf’s comprehensive support and capabilities offers a compelling ROI proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Checkmarx One

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,655 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zafran Security	1.0%
Checkmarx One	1.2%
Arctic Wolf Managed Risk	1.2%
Other	96.6%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Jared Kruger

Buisness Developer Manager / Sales Executive at Troye

Helps to conduct vulnerability scans but needs to add more integrations

There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them.

Read full review

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"We get access to quarterly reviews with their team."

"The reporting is really good from what I've seen so far."

"This solution has made huge strides in improving the awareness of our end users."

"There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you to scan and patch the vulnerabilities. Any 50-member or small company that has an IT footprint carries risk from a cybersecurity perspective. These companies use tools but don't have the talent to leverage them."

"The most valuable feature of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is being informed about what vulnerabilities there are exposed currently."

"The customer support is incredible."

"The user-friendly interface and customizable reporting have helped our IT team interpret and act on the platform's insights."

"I appreciate the professionalism of the tool and have faith in the results it delivers."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk pros

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."

More Checkmarx One pros

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"There are some challenges with integrations in Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. Some integrations could be improved to enhance functionality."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"It could be easier to use. They could present things in a little bit more ranked order rather than kind of giving you everything out there. It should highlight the really important stuff and make it easier to get to good rather than perfect."

"As far as the product is concerned, I would really like the scanning feature to let us know that a threat has been addressed once we apply the relevant patch. We are not seeing this currently when running a scan."

"The best way to take this product to the next level would be to implement a patch management solution."

"The major area for improvement is the lack of a patch management feature to resolve some of the vulnerabilities detected."

"The scalability could improve."

"The presentation of the data could be improved."

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk cons

"Licensing models and Swift language support are the aspects in which this product needs to improve. Swift is a new language, in which major customers require support for lower prices."

"Some were valid and some were not applicable for us based on the scenario."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."

More Checkmarx One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It depends on the company size quite a bit."

"Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonably priced and I rate it a four out of ten."

"The price of Arctic Wolf Managed Risk is reasonable compared to the competition."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"If you want more, you have to pay more. You have to pay for additional modules or functionalities."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What do you like most about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

There are companies that do vulnerability scans. However, what adds value is when two experts come and sit with you t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

The pricing is fair, and I find it reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arctic Wolf Managed Risk?

There are some challenges with integrations in Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. Some integrations could be improved to enhan...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 32% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Adlumin Security Operations vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 14% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 14% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 10% of the time

Barracuda Vulnerabitlity Manager vs Arctic Wolf Managed Risk

Compared 9% of the time

More Arctic Wolf Managed Risk Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 45% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

October 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

October 2025

Download Arctic Wolf Managed Risk product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Delivered by security experts - Concierge Security® Team; the Arctic Wolf® Managed Risk solution enables you to define and contextualize your attack surface coverage across your networks, endpoints, and cloud environments; provides you with the risk priorities in your environment; and advises you on your remediation actions to ensure that you are benchmarking against configuration best practices and continually hardening your security posture.

Arctic Wolf Networks

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Zelle LLP, DNI Corp, Roper Pump, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Buyer's Guide

Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Checkmarx One

September 2025

Free Report: Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Checkmarx One

Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,655 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arctic Wolf Managed Risk vs. Checkmarx One report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.