Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs HPE Wireless WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Networks Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is 6.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Wireless WAN is 2.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
HPE Wireless WAN2.7%
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN6.4%
Other90.9%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

Joseph Colly - PeerSpot reviewer
Reasonably priced and offers a good GUI
The product is very scalable. When it comes to some schools, they start with the solution's proof of concept in certain sections. My company aims to improve the throughputs in the schools where the product is installed. If the rest of the School wants the product, it is easy to set up the solution. My company uses Aruba Networks Wireless WAN for schools and warehouses but not in the retail sector. The product offers reliability and uptime twenty-four hours and seven days a week. My company gets notified if the reliability offered by the product goes down. My company also gets notified if we are getting hacked.
DineshDas - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized features have simplified deployment and improved day-to-day network management
One of the best features of HPE Wireless WAN is Wi-Fi Direct, as it provides dual-band frequency and helps to connect Bluetooth with IoT devices. I am comfortable with this feature and find it beneficial for connectivity. I use centralized management features such as WLC. They have improved operational efficiency significantly. It is one of the best tools we have for centralized management because it is easy to manage, manually delete, and create sites. This makes it easy to implement policies across the network. I see measurable benefits from this centralized solution, which is quite easy to handle as people are comfortable managing the tool. Users do not need hardcore technical expertise to operate it on a day-to-day basis, making it quite comfortable.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be done quickly, and everything functions smoothly."
"I have found the technical support to be one of the most valuable features."
"It integrates with the Aruba portfolio very easily, and it's a vendor-agnostic solution, and that's brilliant."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the streaming of screen sharing."
"Aruba Wireless's best feature is that it's very, very robust."
"I like the solution's ability to add multiple SSIDs on different levels such as enterprise and guest networks."
"The most valuable features are price, quality, and performance."
"The product gives good stability and concurrency."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"It's easy to use."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"It is a good and stable solution."
 

Cons

"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN could improve the solution availability. The selection of mounting hardware for the various radios is limited and poor. Often, you have to create and manufacture your own mounting hardware in certain situations."
"Traffic optimization is required in the future."
"The internet signal and the connection can be better."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing, it's quite a premium."
"It works. We don't look at it any deeper than that and don't find any features ar missing."
"What needs to improve in Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is the support because it takes quite a long time for the support team to resolve issues. Whenever a new version or update is released, my company sees many bugs and issues, so that is another area for improvement as well."
"The customization options could be improved."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"Integration might be improved, particularly with a single sign-on for Active Directory."
"There are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features that other products have."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN should be reduced."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You will need to pay an annual subscription cost."
"The price of this solution is approximately 1,000,000 ESP ($6,750 USD)."
"It is more affordable than Cisco."
"The price of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is less expensive than Ruckus and Cisco."
"The licenses are available as both perpetual or yearly."
"I rate the pricing a seven or eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest and one is the cheapest."
"The product's price is within range since it has a lower price."
"That's really subject to the type of environment you're deploying. If you're doing a full controller model with 200 APs, the initial deployment could be 150 grand. Maintaining that or maintaining support for that per year could be something like 10 to 15 grand per year. In the cloud sense, the cloud is by the number of APs. So, everything is readily available."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product."
"The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
"The price of HPE Wireless WAN is high."
"The price is perfect for me."
"I find the price to be reasonable."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise18
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Aruba Network Wireless WAN?
I recommend Aruba Networks Wireless WAN. I have been using Aruba for approximately a decade. It has a great centralized management system, which means we don’t need wireless LAN controllers at ever...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Networks Wireless WAN?
The price is a little bit expensive. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, I would place them at seven or eight.
What needs improvement with HPE Wireless WAN?
I am not in a position to fully address what can be improved for HPE Wireless WAN currently. However, there are some areas that need improvement, such as connectivity issues and additional features...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Wireless WAN, HP Wireless WAN
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Pittsburgh Golf Club, Rio Rancho Public Schools, Amwaj Rotana - Jumeirah Beach Residence - Dubai, Trevecca Nazarene University
Bell Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. HPE Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.