Asana vs Procore Project Management comparison

"The tool has a lot of integrations."

"Asana has significantly reduced the number of emails we exchange because we can access the project directly. It organizes all the tasks related to each project, assigns them to staff with due dates, and tracks progress."

"The way it handles the task is good. The whole team needs to organize all our tasks using Asana. It helps to clarify and allows us to prioritize tasks effectively."

"It's a great way to organize your daily work within your organization."

"We've been able to improve our time management, making our efforts more efficient."

"Asana provides a lot of options and a lot of customization to give the best efficient way for your business to operate. For example, I can customize my tasks, tables, and pipelines the way I want them to fit my business model. It's easy and highly customizable."

"The structure of organizing tasks is ideal for me."

"Asana, despite its compact size, proves to be incredibly valuable. When initiating a project, it offers the ability to generate a personalized form for clients. In this particular context, my clients include the customer success team and solution architects. This feature allows me to provide them with a convenient means to submit their requests, resembling a ticketing system geared towards internal operations. Moreover, it enables efficient allocation within my team. For instance, if a question pertains to customer success, I can assign it to the CSOps manager and the team. Similarly, if it relates to a specific channel, it can be allocated accordingly."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"What I appreciate about using Procore Project Management is the convenience of putting everything in one location, where pictures, schedules, blueprints, drawings, change orders, and all documents are accessible in one platform."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"In Asana, there's no way to add a custom date field."

"For large teams, scalability should be improved."

"Better integration could be an area for improvement in Asana."

"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."

"The documentation could be enhanced by incorporating more visually informative videos that demonstrate how to accomplish specific tasks. While Asana's community support is valuable for answering questions, finding precise answers often requires sifting through multiple posts. Having concise and explanatory videos would greatly improve the user experience. When searching on platforms like Google, there are many individuals sharing their approaches to using Asana. However, the information provided is often not directly applicable to one's specific needs. Therefore, it would be advantageous to have comprehensive video tutorials that address common user queries. This would provide a more efficient and intuitive way of accessing information, especially when it comes to learning how to navigate and utilize Asana's features effectively."

"This solution has a learning curve, where it is initially difficult to use."

"I did not see a return on investment with Asana, and I cannot share any relevant metrics, such as time saved or improved efficiency."

"More features can be added."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

"Asana has two different types of structures: company vs workspace. Company is really best if all the users you plan to assign work to are all internal (have the same corporate domain in their user ID email address). Once one person signs up (even for a free account) with a corporate email address, Asana will automatically relate that person to that company, if it already exists. If you plan to use it for external collaboration as well as internal, then creating a workspace is a better approach."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It has a free version."

"We paid a monthly licensing fee for the product."

"Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies."

"This solution is reasonably priced."

"We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."