Asana vs Procore Project Management comparison

"The ability to build subtasks and break things down off of our major tasks has been very valuable. It is very stable and extremely scalable. The initial setup is very simple."

"It has helped our departments maintain visibility."

"I would recommend Asana to others."

"It's an easy way to communicate."

"Stable Kanban style tool for collaboration and task management. It runs smoothly and has a straightforward setup."

"The only thing I love about the product is that it is beautiful."

"What I like most about Asana is its simplicity. For example: we're not the only ones using it, and we onboard our customers to it, and normally, they have no questions."

"The solution scales well."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"What I appreciate about using Procore Project Management is the convenience of putting everything in one location, where pictures, schedules, blueprints, drawings, change orders, and all documents are accessible in one platform."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"You need to have an action plan, otherwise, it won't be as effective."

"The documentation for integration could be improved. We require more information to facilitate the integrations."

"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."

"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."

"The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile."

"It would be beneficial to have a native option for Asana to create tickets so we could move away from our main ticketing tool."

"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."

"The calendar view in Asana has shortcomings and can be improved."

"I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."

"Asana has two different types of structures: company vs workspace. Company is really best if all the users you plan to assign work to are all internal (have the same corporate domain in their user ID email address). Once one person signs up (even for a free account) with a corporate email address, Asana will automatically relate that person to that company, if it already exists. If you plan to use it for external collaboration as well as internal, then creating a workspace is a better approach."

"The cost is $25 US per unit per month."

"We paid a monthly licensing fee for the product."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."

"Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."