Asana vs Procore Project Management comparison

"I really enjoy the portfolios in Asana. One of the ways Asana stands out to me is with portfolios. You can have all your different projects, and you can have those assigned to different teams. If you want to customize a grouping of projects, you can use portfolios. For instance, one of the things that we do is we can assign a portfolio to a specific strategic objective we have, and we can put all those projects that are related to that strategic objective in that portfolio. We then know exactly what people are working on to help us achieve our goals. So, I really like portfolios."

"The general UI shows progress and data analytics for all projects in progress."

"The time we are investing through departments with Asana is valuable because we are receiving requests or updates for projects without investing time in meetings or writing emails."

"Asana has helped me (as an individual contributor) organize my daily work and given me a way to plan for longer term objectives."

"I like how easy it is to use the rules within Asana."

"Asana has positively impacted my organization by providing flexibility, improving time to market, and enhancing collaboration."

"The dashboards are really insightful and easy to use."

"It is very good for managing the timeline. I'm a quality manager, and I have different testing projects running with different work breakdown structures. Asana makes it very easy to implement and monitor the plans. It is easy to move the tasks and complete them, break them down, and assign them to people."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"What I appreciate about using Procore Project Management is the convenience of putting everything in one location, where pictures, schedules, blueprints, drawings, change orders, and all documents are accessible in one platform."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"The solution can be difficult for new users to use because of the interface."

"It would be beneficial to have a native option for Asana to create tickets so we could move away from our main ticketing tool."

"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."

"If you have been using a tool like Jira for many years, it make time some time to get used to the minimalist layout in Asana."

"The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile."

"This solution has a learning curve, where it is initially difficult to use."

"It's difficult to have short-term collaborations with external users because the operations team owns the final licenses, and I work for marketing."

"It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"I did not care for the platform from a user-friendly perspective because I am more of a construction professional than a computer professional."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"We paid a monthly licensing fee for the product."

"Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."

"We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."

"The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget."

"The cost is $25 US per unit per month."

"The solution's free version can be used for basic functions."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."