Asana vs Procore Project Management comparison

"The general UI shows progress and data analytics for all projects in progress."

"Asana is a very simple interface for project managers to figure out, providing all the functions they need."

"It’s a great way to communicate plans and progress across the business and is flexible about how much detail I include and how I present it."

"The tool has a lot of integrations."

"It is pretty comprehensive when it comes to the different views that it gives you. It gives you a Gantt chart view, calendar view, board view, and list view. It is kind of helpful to have different types of views and see how it views your different tasks. I appreciate being able to do that. The biggest thing is that it is extremely user friendly. Asana is pretty intuitive. Someone who is not tech-savvy can kind of catch on quickly. It is better than other tools like Smartsheet. Some of the other tools like Microsoft Project and Excel are great tools, but you have to invest a lot of time to learn them, which is not the case with Asana."

"It is stable and easy to set up."

"Asana has significantly reduced the number of emails we exchange because we can access the project directly. It organizes all the tasks related to each project, assigns them to staff with due dates, and tracks progress."

"My task box displays all of our tasks, organized by day, helping us to focus on what needs to be done each day."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"There just needs to be a bit more direction on how to use it at the outset."

"The documentation could be enhanced by incorporating more visually informative videos that demonstrate how to accomplish specific tasks. While Asana's community support is valuable for answering questions, finding precise answers often requires sifting through multiple posts. Having concise and explanatory videos would greatly improve the user experience. When searching on platforms like Google, there are many individuals sharing their approaches to using Asana. However, the information provided is often not directly applicable to one's specific needs. Therefore, it would be advantageous to have comprehensive video tutorials that address common user queries. This would provide a more efficient and intuitive way of accessing information, especially when it comes to learning how to navigate and utilize Asana's features effectively."

"In Asana, there's no way to add a custom date field."

"This solution has a learning curve, where it is initially difficult to use."

"The calendar view in Asana has shortcomings and can be improved."

"The inbox feature can be a little overwhelming if you are working with Asana just from its project boards and only checking it periodically."

"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."

"There could be some improvements in terms of how projects or day-to-day work is organized. One of the challenges when it comes to rolling out to an enterprise is the way the projects are organized. It has a kind of setup where you have different projects and tasks, but it is not as organized as Smartsheet when it comes to organizing projects or different teams. It can get really cluttered really fast. JIRA has another suite to submit the support tickets. It would be good if Asana could branch out to incorporate some kind of workflow. It is great for collaboration and recording work, but there isn't any workflow. It would be useful if they can map out a workflow of who approves what. This is kind of a big ask, and it is not geared towards that."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies."

"The cost is $25 US per unit per month."

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

"Its price is fair. Its licensing cost is cheaper than Microsoft Project. I would rate it a two out of five in terms of pricing."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"This solution is reasonably priced."

"The solution's free version can be used for basic functions."

"For what it brings to the table, I think Asana is fairly affordable. I would like to see the portfolio feature in our pricing plan, but other than that, it's definitely pretty good."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."