Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Project vs Procore Project Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Project
Ranking in Project Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Procore Project Management
Ranking in Project Management Software
21st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Project is 8.9%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Procore Project Management is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

Md.  Kamruzzaman - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution that very accurately runs projects
Project availability and speed could always be improved. Most of the time, we get the target from the system. If there is a chance to improve the interface, then it should be implemented. Otherwise, our end users are satisfied with using our own interface. Reports could be pushed more quickly.
reviewer2223708 - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps with project management and offers good value for money
We use the solution for project management.  The financial side of Procore Project Management is better.  It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive.  I would rate the tool's stability a seven out of ten.  Procore Project Management is…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I find all the features of the solution valuable."
"We use Microsoft Project for its timeline and task management capabilities. The primary advantage is the easy application of tasks in sequence, confirming dependencies, and establishing relationships between tasks. It simplifies handling conditions, significant dates, and dependencies between various tasks."
"The user interface is simple and it helps me in planning what needs to be accomplished."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"Microsoft Project is used to track the project delivery and the project management."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Project is status reporting."
"The solution is stable."
"I have found that the chart reporting feature is very helpful for us currently."
"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."
 

Cons

"This solution needs more customization."
"It is a traditional Waterfall-based solution, so it doesn't lend itself particularly well to Agile development. You can record Agile sprints within it, but it is not really an Agile-based product. It can store the basic information about budgets that an Agile set of work is looking to use, but that's about it."
"Microsoft Project could improve the dates. Sometimes the dates are not aligned. This occurs even when you auto-schedule the dates. We have to go and define the schedule daily this should more easily accessible."
"It needs to be more comprehensive."
"Microsoft Project should provide better documentation regarding the usage of the solution."
"It would be better if the solution is integrated with other communication platforms like Microsoft Teams."
"The solution could be more flexible when it comes to integration."
"The solution could offer waterfall options for agile and sprint planning."
"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We purchase perpetual licenses due to the high cost of subscriptions, which are about 1,000 Australian dollars."
"Licensing costs vary depending on the user volume. The pricing is good, I'd rate it four out of five."
"I am not involved with this."
"It probably was $30 per license on a monthly basis. There is no additional fee."
"The solution is less expensive than other options."
"The solution is expensive."
"You do not have to invest much in terms of configuring this solution to suit your needs."
"You only need a Team's license in order to use Microsoft Project within Teams, which is very helpful."
"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
67%
Computer Software Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Government
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Government
10%
Construction Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Has anyone moved from Microsoft Project to Smartsheet? How has your experience been with Smartsheet?
Hi @Eire Zimmermann, I helped an organization evaluate both MS-Project and Smartsheet when they were conducting their PM tool RFP. The short of it is this, MS Project is not caught up with the mo...
What do you like most about Microsoft Project?
The product's initial setup phase is easy.
What do you like most about Procore Project Management?
The financial side of Procore Project Management is better.
What needs improvement with Procore Project Management?
It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive.
 

Also Known As

Project Pro, MS Project
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aston Martin, ABANCA, Airbus Group, Capita, Cardiff University, City of Saskatoon, Intel, Pegasus Airlines, South Australia Power Network (SAPN), Israeli Ministry of Construction and Housing
Consigli,Doran,Harvey,HITT,Mortenson construction,Robins and Morton
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Atlassian and others in Project Management Software. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.