Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AuraQuantic vs IBM BPM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
18th
Ranking in Process Automation
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (17th), No-Code Development Platforms (7th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (9th)
IBM BPM
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
8th
Ranking in Process Automation
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
109
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM BPM is 7.7%, up from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 14, 2024
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
I use the solution for ticketing to ask for services, including asking for services or payments.  It's often used for new employees It has impacted because it is an easy way to create new solutions for daily work, for example, giving tickets to ask for a vehicle to do a comission or also to ask…
Mohammed Almalki - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 8, 2024
Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve
We mainly use it for human-centric operational processes (less than 20) The case management and its integration with process design are the only pros comparable to Komunda. There is room for improvement in terms of integrations. It is one of the biggest drawbacks. My organization has been using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"Its most valuable features are usability and integration with other IBM products."
"Everything is coupled together and comes as one solution."
"Compliance with the BPMN 2.0 standard."
"The solution offers great notifications."
"The installation was straightforward."
"Its workflow and integration with SAP are the most valuable features. It is also a stable solution."
"The solution is more customizable than IBM FileNet."
"IBM BPM's best features include document sharing, management document creation, widget and barcode creation, and integration."
 

Cons

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"The setup was quite complex because the solution was cutting-edge at that time and IBM invested considerably in the implementation, likely at a loss to themselves."
"I would like to see a lot more case studies."
"The pricing is a little bit high. It's gone up in cost."
"One area for improvement is the scripting languages used within the solution. They could integrate other languages such as GoMango or Python than JavaScript."
"The front end is not customised for a good user experience."
"The configuration is not that easy, and the initial deployment took three months."
"The people working on the front desk are having some problem with managing the documentation. For instance, they get a picture, and if the picture comes rotated 90 degrees, together with a picture that is not rotated, they have some problems dealing with that, technically. There are some minor aspects that on the usability side that are still lacking. That has to do with FileNet, too, I'm talking about the suite together."
"I would like to see the front-end support improved because it should be fully integrated and supported."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."
"The cloud and license of the subscription model for IBM BPM can be complex. There are a lot of alternatives to choose from."
"When considering the features of the solution the price is expensive compared to competitors."
"Starting out with Express can also help reduce the cost for adopting the product."
"The solution is highly-priced."
"I think it's a reasonably priced tool, but it's important to consider which customers should buy this solution. It's designed for enterprise customers, not small ones."
"We have a yearly licensing model. It is not expensive. There are no addition costs to the standard license."
"Our customers do see ROI. They'll identify some particularly painful or uncoordinated processes to start with, then build out from there, picking off low hanging fruit."
"We chose to purchase IBM BPM because it was bundled with the actual RPA program/solution that we decided to purchase. We decided to use Automation Anywhere tool (RPA), and it is was bundled with IBM BPM."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuraQuantic?
I do not handle the licensing. I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. It's not within the scope of my work.
What needs improvement with AuraQuantic?
We're just using images. We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example. There could be more adoptions. We'd like the option to connect this product with oth...
Which is better, IBM BPM or IBM Business Automation Workflow?
We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing en...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. IBM BPM and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.