Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] vs Stonebranch comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] customer service is prompt, knowledgeable, and provides clear communication, quickly resolving issues with expertise.
Sentiment score
8.1
Stonebranch customer service is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and quick resolutions, though some seek improved critical incident response times.
You can contact their support through a special portal if you encounter any issues or need assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence needs better reporting, documentation, integration, performance, learning curve, and customer support improvements.
Sentiment score
6.8
Stonebranch needs enhanced UI, task management, mainframe integration, and better training, with improved features and analytics in Universal Automation Center.
The job reporting feature needs improvement.
The integration of the solution could be improved.
The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is praised for scalability, robust architecture, seamless integration, and consistent performance despite initial configuration challenges.
Sentiment score
8.5
Stonebranch scales effectively, efficiently managing large tasks and environments, though there's room for improvement in node expansion and controller capabilities.
The tool supports any number of agents or jobs, given you have sufficient resources such as RAM, CPU, and storage for the database.
The solution is scalable, it can connect to multiple schedules.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
<p>Automic Automation Intelligence pricing is flexible, varies by requirements, but can be high for complex setups; inquire for detailed quotes.</p>
No sentiment score available
Stonebranch offers cost-effective pricing, unlimited features, and included support, making it cheaper than competitors like Automic and Control-M.
The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used.
expensive infrastructure with great potential for scalability
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence offers reliable stability, minimal downtime, consistent performance, and effective workload handling, ensuring seamless operation and trust.
Sentiment score
7.5
Stonebranch is praised for stability, quick issue resolution, and high-availability features, with minimal disruptions even during maintenance.
Automic Automation Intelligence is a highly stable solution.
I rate the tool's stability a nine point five out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Automic Automation Intelligence enhances efficiency with job scheduling, analytics, real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, tool integration, and predictive analysis.
Sentiment score
7.8
Stonebranch provides platform-neutral task automation, robust workflow management, and customizable scheduling, enhancing visibility and efficiency in diverse environments.
The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place.
Its user interface is user-friendly.
 

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Stonebranch
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (16th)
 

Featured Reviews

DS
Saves time on manual processes and provides alerts on special scenarios
The installation process is quite straightforward, although some database knowledge is required for setting up the base. Alternatively, someone with the necessary capabilities can handle this step for you. Overall, the installation is especially easy for Windows platforms. Deployment can be completed in three days. The number of people required to manage the tool depends on the size of the environment. One person may suffice for smaller environments, while larger environments may require two or three individuals. The frequency of scheduling requests, additional responsibilities within the environment, and the company's specific needs all play a role in determining the necessary staffing. One or two individuals can handle the maintenance if the setup is stable with minimal changes. However, in the case of frequent changes, more staff may be needed to manage the tool.
Earl Diem - PeerSpot reviewer
Allowed us to develop workflows without having to train and develop very specialized skillsets
The Universal Agent is the most valuable feature. Being agent-based and being able to go across multiple technology stacks, which is what our workflows do, Stonebranch gives us the ability to bridge those disparate technologies. It enables us to remove the dependency-gap with the agent so we know the status of the workflow at each step. Workflow development in Stonebranch is straightforward. There is something of a learning curve, but it's not very steep. Being able to develop workflows without having to train and develop some very specialized skillsets to use the tool is very useful. Stonebranch absolutely helped enable digital transformation in our company and it still is. In our automation efforts, we're pushing everything to Informatica and, as we move those ETLs, we're automating the entire workflows. In phase-one and phase-two, there were 244 jobs migrated in from other ETL platforms to Informatica, and we've automated all of those. We have almost 200 jobs remaining. We're going to have something approaching 450 workflows in Stonebranch when we're done.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
16%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?
The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.
What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?
The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...
What do you like most about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
We like that it has GUI and is not just a command line.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
The pricing is good. I would rate it eight out of ten. The pricing is similar to AutoSys. It's lower than Redwood, which was on the higher side in terms of pricing.
What needs improvement with Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?
It can be hard to manage the task monitor. We are still working with the vendor, and we are trying to make the changes as per our requirements. We are asking them to build some new solutions so the...
 

Also Known As

Terma Suite
Stonebranch Universal Automation Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2024.
816,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.