Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] vs Stonebranch comparison

Broadcom and Stonebranch are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Stonebranch users who would recommend it.

Automic Automation Intellig...

Read 3 Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Stonebranch

Read 26 Stonebranch reviews

3,033 Views
1,410 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Automic Automation Intellig...

Stonebranch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Both Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] and Stonebranch are automation solutions with unique attributes catering to different user needs. Stonebranch is viewed as superior due to its comprehensive features and overall user satisfaction.

Features: Users note Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]'s robust reporting, strong analytics, and useful data visualization options. Stonebranch stands out with advanced scheduling capabilities, extensive integrations with popular tools, and comprehensive task automation, giving it a modern and versatile feature set.

Room for Improvement: Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] could enhance cloud integration, increase update frequency, and improve user interface customization. Stonebranch could improve training documentation, address performance tuning issues, and streamline the user onboarding process. Despite these areas, Stonebranch's improvement needs are less critical.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is generally easy to deploy, but support response is often slow, frustrating users. Stonebranch offers a smooth deployment process with a responsive customer service team, making it more attractive to users in need of reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers competitive pricing with mixed ROI experiences. Stonebranch, while potentially pricier, is considered worth the investment due to its rich feature set and high-value delivery. Stonebranch is perceived to provide better ROI despite higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: September 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

September 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 813,418 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Automation Intellig...

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Stonebranch

Average Rating

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (17th)

Featured Reviews

Dalibor Sefcik

Personal Assistant at Centrum.sk

Jan 11, 2024

Saves time on manual processes and provides alerts on special scenarios

The installation process is quite straightforward, although some database knowledge is required for setting up the base. Alternatively, someone with the necessary capabilities can handle this step for you. Overall, the installation is especially easy for Windows platforms. Deployment can be completed in three days. The number of people required to manage the tool depends on the size of the environment. One person may suffice for smaller environments, while larger environments may require two or three individuals. The frequency of scheduling requests, additional responsibilities within the environment, and the company's specific needs all play a role in determining the necessary staffing. One or two individuals can handle the maintenance if the setup is stable with minimal changes. However, in the case of frequent changes, more staff may be needed to manage the tool.

Read full review

Earl Diem

Sr. Manager - Performance and Automation Engineering at PSCU Financial Services

Aug 22, 2019

Allowed us to develop workflows without having to train and develop very specialized skillsets

The Universal Agent is the most valuable feature. Being agent-based and being able to go across multiple technology stacks, which is what our workflows do, Stonebranch gives us the ability to bridge those disparate technologies. It enables us to remove the dependency-gap with the agent so we know the status of the workflow at each step. Workflow development in Stonebranch is straightforward. There is something of a learning curve, but it's not very steep. Being able to develop workflows without having to train and develop some very specialized skillsets to use the tool is very useful. Stonebranch absolutely helped enable digital transformation in our company and it still is. In our automation efforts, we're pushing everything to Informatica and, as we move those ETLs, we're automating the entire workflows. In phase-one and phase-two, there were 244 jobs migrated in from other ETL platforms to Informatica, and we've automated all of those. We have almost 200 jobs remaining. We're going to have something approaching 450 workflows in Stonebranch when we're done.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

"The Action Packs are a good feature."

"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."

"The support is good from Stonebranch Universal Automation Center."

"The features are upgraded, and every six months they're releasing patches."

"I have found the agents to be so much simpler, when compared to ESP."

"The tasks are incredibly capable, and as long as you name them with a nice, uniform naming convention, they are very useful. You can create some interesting workflows through various machines, or you can just have it kick off single tasks. All in all, I really like the Universal Task. You can do some mutually exclusive stuff, such as an "A not B" kind of thing. It has a lot of capabilities behind the scenes."

"I love the Universal Controller. It's been great for us. We host it on-premise... It's High Availability, meaning there's failover from one server to the other if one goes down."

"I like the dashboard and the various workflows."

"I can name the aliases on the agent, so if we need a passive environment for an agent, that's one of the nice features. If our primary goes down, I can bring up the passive one and I don't have to change anything in the scheduling world. It will start running from that new server."

"The ability to monitor tasks that are on the open-system side as well as our mainframe side gives us a one-window view of all our processes."

More Stonebranch pros

Cons

"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."

"The job reporting feature needs improvement."

"Integration of the solution could be improved."

"Stonebranch Universal Automation Center could improve the analytics."

"Occasionally, we have an agent that doesn't come back up after patching. That doesn't happen very often... It's really just a restart of the agent and it comes back up. But that might be one thing that could be improved."

"One hiccup we've had is due to the fact that we have other internal scheduling tools. We're able to talk to them, but we have trouble with some of the networking between them, so we're still trying to work out the kinks there."

"It's not available on the cloud, so they should take that due to safety, security, and scalability."

"It can't handle negative written codes."

"It would be ideal if they had the exact same features as the CA Workload Automation DE series. It would be helpful to have calendaring options."

"There is room for improvement with its connectivity with the Microsoft SRS system. It is very weak. They keep telling us it works with it, and technically it does, but it does not provide a lot of visibility. We have lost a lot of visibility migrating to Stonebranch, compared with just running tasks on the SRS server. That's really about the only thing that is a sore point for us."

"It can be hard to manage the task monitor."

More Stonebranch cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."

"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."

"Outside of licensing fees, there aren't any other costs."

"I don't have pricing information, but I do know it's cheaper than our old legacy system. Other than the standard licensing fees there are no additional costs."

"When we reviewed this solution against other vendors, Stonebranch blew everybody out of the water in terms of cost."

"We're transaction-based, as far as our licensing goes. We have 50,000 transactions a month and our licensing cost is $55,000 a year..."

"The price of the solution is at a medium level compared to the competition."

"Stonebranch is cheaper than Control-M, so many companies are using Stonebranch."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automic Automation Intelligence?

The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Automation Intelligence?

The job reporting feature needs improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automic Automation Intelligence?

The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?

We like that it has GUI and is not just a command line.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?

The pricing is good. I would rate it eight out of ten. The pricing is similar to AutoSys. It's lower than Redwood, which was on the higher side in terms of pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Stonebranch Universal Automation Center?

It can be hard to manage the task monitor. We are still working with the vendor, and we are trying to make the changes as per our requirements. We are asking them to build some new solutions so the...

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

AppWorx Workload Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

Automic Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Control-M vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

More Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] Competitors

Control-M vs Stonebranch

Compared 35% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 23% of the time

ESP Workload Automation Intelligence vs Stonebranch

Compared 9% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Stonebranch

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 8% of the time

More Stonebranch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

September 2024

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Stonebranch

September 2024

Download Stonebranch product report

Also Known As

Terma Suite

Stonebranch Universal Automation Center

Learn More

Broadcom

Stonebranch

Overview

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is designed for batch job scheduling and workload automation, improving efficiency in complex IT environments by monitoring, predicting, and optimizing job completion times.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] assists organizations in managing batch job scheduling and workload automation, providing detailed insights into job dependencies and performance. Its ability to integrate with multiple systems enhances collaboration, reduces manual intervention, and offers greater control over IT processes. With robust monitoring capabilities and comprehensive reporting, it helps in making informed decisions, although it requires better scalability and improved performance handling large datasets. Improved integration with third-party tools and more comprehensive documentation would further enhance its usability.

What are the key features of Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]?

Exceptional workload automation: Streamlines batch job scheduling and workload automation.
Comprehensive reporting: Provides detailed reports for better insights and decision-making.
Predictive analytics: Monitors and predicts job completion times for improved efficiency.
Robust monitoring: Enhances operational transparency with strong monitoring capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced efficiency: Reduces manual intervention and optimizes job management.
Better control: Improved monitoring and insights offer greater control over IT processes.
Operational transparency: Provides visibility into job dependencies and performance metrics.
Informed decision-making: Detailed reporting supports strategic planning and execution.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing to automate and optimize complex IT workflows, ensuring efficient management and operation of critical systems.

Stonebranch automates workloads, managing over 500,000 jobs weekly, integrating with Informatica for ETL processes, and operates both on-prem and in private clouds for companies in different industries.

Stonebranch excels in handling IT workflow automation such as billing, reporting, and analytics. It effectively runs SAP application jobs and creates workflows to optimize task times across multiple machines. The solution enhances task visibility for clients, ensuring smooth operations. It offers a streamlined installation process, scalability, reasonable pricing, and a graphical, intuitive dashboard. Despite its strengths, users note areas for improvement like more advanced features, better dependency visibility between workflows, and improved connectivity with Microsoft SRS. Some challenges include dealing with negative codes, cloud availability, managing the task monitor, tracking jobs, and initial simulations.

What are Stonebranch's most valuable features?

Reliability and compatibility of agents
Universal Agent's cross-technology capability
Ease of workflow development
Universal Controller's task management and error visibility
Minimal footprint and stable interface
User-friendly dashboard
Straightforward installation and scalability
Graphical representation and intuitive design
Regular upgrades, dependency settings, and automation capabilities
Task monitor and robust technical support

What key benefits or ROI items should users look for in reviews when evaluating Stonebranch?

Streamlined installation process
Scalability and cost-effectiveness
Graphical, intuitive dashboard
Robust task management and error visibility
Reliable and compatible agents
Effective workflow development and automation capabilities
Continuous upgrades and strong technical support

Stonebranch is implemented across many industries to manage complex IT workflows. It is widely used for running SAP application jobs, integrating ETL processes with Informatica, and automating essential tasks. Companies benefit from creating efficient workflows, improving task times, and gaining enhanced task visibility, facilitating seamless operations both on-prem and in private clouds.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Redwood Software, Tidal Software by Redwood and others in Workload Automation. Updated: September 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.