


Stonebranch and ActiveBatch by Redwood are major competitors in the IT automation and orchestration space. ActiveBatch by Redwood edges out Stonebranch in user ease with pre-built job steps and automation ease across platforms based on user preferences.
Features: Stonebranch offers robust agents for seamless cross-platform integrations, emphasizing stability and security, which is highly valued for complex workflows. Its strong versatility in bridging disparate technologies is highlighted in user reviews. ActiveBatch by Redwood is noted for its extensive library of pre-built job steps which simplifies automation, allowing users to easily automate across platforms. The ease of use is a distinct advantage for users requiring straightforward automation.
Room for Improvement: Stonebranch users highlight the need for better graphical workflow overviews, increased FTP task flexibility, and enhanced AI integration. Users of ActiveBatch by Redwood suggest improvements in UI modernization, better documentation, and enhanced integration with cloud platforms to meet evolving technological demands.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stonebranch supports versatile deployment across on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, with users praising its knowledgeable support in complex scenarios. ActiveBatch by Redwood offers varied deployment models and is recognized for helpful customer service, although some express concerns about response times. Each caters to different deployment preferences, providing solid support where needed.
Pricing and ROI: Stonebranch is considered cost-effective, frequently cited as cheaper than competitors like Control-M, resulting in noticeable savings, especially in licensing and maintenance. ActiveBatch by Redwood is viewed as a reliable investment, with pricing seen as reasonable compared to other tools. Both are regarded as offering good value, with Stonebranch often associated with greater cost savings.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
I would say we have seen a 30% return on investment because we had multiple tools in place previously, and now we have stopped using all those tools.
We require fewer team members to handle operations due to its robust automation.
We plan to migrate all the different work scheduling tools to Stonebranch, so I think we will have a single centralized license that will save a lot of cost to the company.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
We often need to escalate issues to level two or three for solutions related to long-standing problems.
The service executive was very prompt in providing a solution.
We received very good training given by Stonebranch staff, including operator training and administration training.
Customer support is good because I have an L1 team continuously monitoring my configurations and transfers.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
For scalability, I would rate it as seven because when we have a huge volume, sometimes the tool is not so responsive.
ActiveBatch by Redwood's scalability is excellent; it experiences minimal failures and outages.
Stonebranch is a very scalable application, and we can use it on various integrations and applications.
Stonebranch's scalability is very good.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Stonebranch is very stable, and there are no bugs or glitches.
We have a huge workload across multiple regions and we are running on the same UAC.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
On the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs.
I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.
We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things.
Stonebranch can be improved due to an issue I had a few weeks ago with data leakage, as the servers consume more RAM than usual during continuous file transfers, and this utilization should be less.
Creating a task or job and then creating a schedule with time triggers and other triggers in different objects feels a bit complicated compared to other tools in the market where everything is laid out in a single pane and scheduling is easy.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
My thoughts on the pricing of JAMS are that I won't say it is cheap, but it is cost-efficient, and that should be acceptable.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Stonebranch has been that it is a very affordable tool.
From an organizational cost perspective with Stonebranch, it is a bit cheaper than other tools available in the market.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
JAMS helps centralize the management of jobs on all of my platforms and applications, which has helped my organization significantly.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The addition of AI has made troubleshooting and supporting users through ActiveBatch by Redwood quicker for me.
The best feature that ActiveBatch by Redwood offers is the user interface.
Stonebranch helps in reducing the times and the errors, and as a team, we can coordinate very smoothly with each other because the runtime is very fast, ensuring that each and every member is having similar experiences without any bugs.
Reporting helps us observe the trend of how much the script has executed in the past and what sort of load is expected in the future based on that analysis.
The best feature Stonebranch offers in my experience is its security, allowing users to easily access files while creating accounts for particular users, making file transfer and retrieval easy with a level of security superior to other transfers.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.8% |
| Stonebranch | 4.6% |
| ActiveBatch by Redwood | 2.9% |
| Other | 89.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.
ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.
What important features does ActiveBatch offer?In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.
Stonebranch specializes in enterprise automation, excelling in workload scheduling and batch processing across platforms like Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries. This platform offers robust automation, enhancing operational efficiency and supporting digital transformation.
Stonebranch's platform-agnostic capabilities allow organizations to manage and integrate workloads seamlessly. Its Universal Controller is central to task management, offering a web-based interface for flexibility. Users appreciate its stability, with reliable agents facilitating workflow creation without specialized skills. Efficient file transfers and scheduling tools minimize maintenance, supporting diverse tech environments. Though Stonebranch is beneficial, users look for improvements in graphical workflow visibility, finalized API functionalities, and enhanced connectivity with tools like Microsoft SRS. Enhancements in training materials and cloud availability are also desired.
What are the key features of Stonebranch?Stonebranch finds applications in sectors requiring enterprise automation. Organizations leveraging Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries utilize it for workflow automation, file management, and integrating distributed workloads. It supports tasks like data extraction and analytics, managing thousands of daily operations to enhance visibility and minimize manual interventions.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.