


Stonebranch and ActiveBatch compete in the workload automation software category. ActiveBatch seems to have the upper hand due to its drag-and-drop functionality and robust API capabilities enhancing automation efficiency.
Features: Stonebranch is renowned for its platform compatibility, robust task monitoring, and a stable Universal Agent. The Universal Controller offers strong visibility and automation across multiple platforms. Users highlight workflow flexibility. ActiveBatch includes extensive pre-built job steps, strong REST API capabilities, and native integrations. The single pane of glass feature provides end-to-end workflow visibility, and drag-and-drop functionality streamlines tasks.
Room for Improvement: Stonebranch users desire more intuitive graphical workflow overviews, better REST API error message visibility, and dynamic task insertion capabilities. Improvements are needed in FTP task flexibility and support for mainframe environments. ActiveBatch requires GUI enhancements, robust cloud integrations, and improved event-based triggers. Users suggest simpler installation guides, better alerting mechanisms, and a more user-friendly interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Stonebranch and ActiveBatch offer strong on-premises deployment, with ActiveBatch providing more cloud flexibility for hybrid and public cloud environments. Stonebranch excels in mainframe and Unix support with high responsiveness. ActiveBatch users generally have positive customer service experiences but report occasional delays.
Pricing and ROI: Stonebranch is praised for competitive pricing and lower licensing costs, leading to a positive ROI. ActiveBatch’s pricing is viewed as fair; however, its shift toward a subscription model raises cost concerns among some users. Investment in training and support adds value, with notable ROI from improved automation efficiency. Stonebranch’s cost-effective nature contrasts with ActiveBatch's evolving pricing model, reflecting varying user experiences in cost-effectiveness and value perception.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
We require fewer team members to handle operations due to its robust automation.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
We often need to escalate issues to level two or three for solutions related to long-standing problems.
The service executive was very prompt in providing a solution.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
ActiveBatch by Redwood's scalability is excellent; it experiences minimal failures and outages.
Stonebranch is a very scalable application, and we can use it on various integrations and applications.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Stonebranch is very stable, and there are no bugs or glitches.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
On the web console, users encounter daily activity issues where the job instances do not appear or update correctly, and they cannot view the latest logs.
I believe ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved because the UI could be modernized.
We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for ActiveBatch by Redwood has been great
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Stonebranch has been that it is a very affordable tool.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
The addition of AI has made troubleshooting and supporting users through ActiveBatch by Redwood quicker for me.
The best feature that ActiveBatch by Redwood offers is the user interface.
Stonebranch helps in reducing the times and the errors, and as a team, we can coordinate very smoothly with each other because the runtime is very fast, ensuring that each and every member is having similar experiences without any bugs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.3% |
| ActiveBatch by Redwood | 2.8% |
| Stonebranch | 4.4% |
| Other | 90.5% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.
ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.
What important features does ActiveBatch offer?In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.
Stonebranch specializes in enterprise automation, excelling in workload scheduling and batch processing across platforms like Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries. This platform offers robust automation, enhancing operational efficiency and supporting digital transformation.
Stonebranch's platform-agnostic capabilities allow organizations to manage and integrate workloads seamlessly. Its Universal Controller is central to task management, offering a web-based interface for flexibility. Users appreciate its stability, with reliable agents facilitating workflow creation without specialized skills. Efficient file transfers and scheduling tools minimize maintenance, supporting diverse tech environments. Though Stonebranch is beneficial, users look for improvements in graphical workflow visibility, finalized API functionalities, and enhanced connectivity with tools like Microsoft SRS. Enhancements in training materials and cloud availability are also desired.
What are the key features of Stonebranch?Stonebranch finds applications in sectors requiring enterprise automation. Organizations leveraging Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries utilize it for workflow automation, file management, and integrating distributed workloads. It supports tasks like data extraction and analytics, managing thousands of daily operations to enhance visibility and minimize manual interventions.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.