Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

Broadcom and Microsoft are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Read 137 Microsoft Azure DevOps reviews

15,808 Views
8,852 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and Microsoft Azure DevOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

137

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Have built reliable end-to-end pipelines and streamlined cloud provisioning through consistent collaboration practices

I am currently working with open-source tools such as Jenkins for my main CI/CD pipeline, and for enterprise clients, I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps CI/CD pipeline. For other clients, I have also implemented CI/CD YAML pipelines through GitLab CI/CD workflow and GitHub Actions. I am creating the end-to-end CI/CD pipeline from development to deployment and monitoring all of this. Azure Boards is easier than Jira for my understanding because there are very easy points to manage the Agile methodology which we work on. Because it is a GUI, sometimes the process may take a few minutes more than the CLI process since the backend is running the exact CLI, but we are commanding through the GUI. There is definitely a time lag, but it is more secure. Microsoft Azure DevOps pipelines work very seamlessly rather than other CI/CD pipelines, as of my understanding. The downside is that the process may take more time when deploying some clusters, Kubernetes, Azure AKS service, or some vast microservice architecture deployments. There may be a little bit of lag I feel, though I cannot tell very strictly that this is a disadvantage, but sometimes it takes a little more time than other cloud infrastructures. All the major things are done by GUI, which is somewhat a little slow. However, if considering automations, process, monitoring, and provisioning, then it is the best cloud service across all the other service providers. Our implementation is a hybrid cloud. Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely easily scalable. I have worked on many Kubernetes infrastructures and microservice deployments, and I have seen that replication is very good because it is very easy. The replication process is very straightforward. I definitely advocate for using less code because it is very time-consuming. If using GCP or Amazon Web Service, there is more interaction related to work over the CLI process. In terms of Microsoft Azure DevOps, there are many things done by the GUI, which is the best part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."

"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."

"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

"What we like about the product is that it is more or less an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment."

"The agents are one of the solution's most valuable features, and I like agents for file transfers so you can transfer the files from agent to agent on the different platforms."

"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."

"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."

"You can design your workflows for your needs."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"It is good for the purpose it is designed for; it is good for maintaining a repository of application code, creating pipelines for deploying the code, building the code, and deploying the code, and it can be easily used by developers with no issues."

"The automated bill process makes it a lot easier to track down where the issues are and find out what bugs aren't being included for whatever reason."

"Azure DevOps is complete and meets all of your expectations."

"Stable and scalable solution for work planning and code collaboration. It's fast, and it offers a good user experience."

"The solution is good for everything, including end-to-end planning and its deployment and testing."

"Overall, this is a good product and if the Gantt chart and occupancy reporting features are added then it will be the most powerful one in this space."

"There has been a measurable improvement in productivity of around 40 to 50% after implementing Microsoft Azure DevOps, which has allowed more time to be spent on other things."

"It is a cloud-based system. So, it is stable and scalable."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pros

Cons

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

"One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform."

"File transfer is not very efficient. It takes a bit longer than some other methods and when you send the file from one platform to another, especially from the mainframe, the results consumption is quite high compared to other methods."

"The first time setup can be very complicated."

"key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking."

"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"I would like to see DevOps have the ability to give us something with a compatibility or traceability matrix."

"It is not that intuitive. Sometimes, it is hard to find some of the functions. I would like to have an old-fashioned menu structure to be able to easily find things. Its environment setup is not very good. They should improve the way it is set up for different screens and make it easier to find functionalities and maintain team members."

"Not everything about this solution was intuitive."

"There could more integration with other platforms."

"As for improvement, the first one is pricing. For us, luckily because we are partners, it's free. Microsoft gold partners do not have to pay, but if you're not a partner, the product is very expensive."

"It should be able to handle the different types. There is ecosystems engineering, and there is software applications engineering. There is a need to bring these teams together, but the disciplines don't integrate very well, and so it won't work."

"The UI could be improved."

"Microsoft Azure DevOps could improve by having better integration with other email servers."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers often complain about the price."

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"Compared to other tools, Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cheap solution."

"I find that the pricing is good, and it is competitive with the other vendors in the market."

"Licensing cost per user is approximately $11 to $15. We have about 400 users, but not all are active. We have around 200 to 300 active users."

"I am not aware of any licensing subscriptions for the solution."

"The price is cheaper than Jira and some of the other competing tools."

"The price of this solution is fair."

"The price is reasonable, but of course, you can find others that are cheaper such as Atlassian."

"Microsoft Azure DevOps is an expensive solution."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	68

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity.

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

GitLab vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 51% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 5% of the time

Rally Software vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 4% of the time

Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

April 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure DevOps

April 2026

Download Microsoft Azure DevOps product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers full cycle integration with CI/CD pipelines and a user-friendly interface. It streamlines development processes and supports Agile planning, making it a versatile choice for teams focusing on software development and project management.

Azure DevOps is designed to enhance productivity with its comprehensive project management features, including task management and backlog organization. It supports automation, agile methodologies, and provides seamless integration with Microsoft products. Despite its robust functionalities, users suggest enhancements in customization, integration with external platforms like GitHub and Office 365, as well as advancements in reporting and dashboard functionalities. Azure DevOps plays a key role in CI/CD workflows, code repository management, work item tracking, and test automation, promoting collaboration across distributed teams.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Full Cycle Integration: Manages the entire development lifecycle supporting CI/CD pipelines.
Agile Support: Facilitates agile planning and backlog management for efficient project execution.
Project Management: Offers comprehensive task management features to streamline workflows.
Microsoft Integration: Provides seamless connectivity with other Microsoft tools.
Automation and Reporting: Enhances efficiency through automated processes and reporting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect from Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Increased Productivity: Streamlines development and project management processes.
Scalability: Adapts to the growing needs of development teams and projects.
Customization: Offers extensions to tailor functionalities to meet specific project requirements.
Enhanced Collaboration: Supports distributed teams with effective communication tools.

Microsoft Azure DevOps is widely implemented in industries focusing on software development and IT project management. It is specifically suitable for organizations that prioritize continuous integration, agile practices, and cross-team collaboration. Companies leverage Azure DevOps for managing code repositories, automating builds, and tracking work items, ensuring efficient project delivery in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.