Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

Broadcom and Microsoft are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Read 137 Microsoft Azure DevOps reviews

15,808 Views
8,852 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and Microsoft Azure DevOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

137

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Have built reliable end-to-end pipelines and streamlined cloud provisioning through consistent collaboration practices

I am currently working with open-source tools such as Jenkins for my main CI/CD pipeline, and for enterprise clients, I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps CI/CD pipeline. For other clients, I have also implemented CI/CD YAML pipelines through GitLab CI/CD workflow and GitHub Actions. I am creating the end-to-end CI/CD pipeline from development to deployment and monitoring all of this. Azure Boards is easier than Jira for my understanding because there are very easy points to manage the Agile methodology which we work on. Because it is a GUI, sometimes the process may take a few minutes more than the CLI process since the backend is running the exact CLI, but we are commanding through the GUI. There is definitely a time lag, but it is more secure. Microsoft Azure DevOps pipelines work very seamlessly rather than other CI/CD pipelines, as of my understanding. The downside is that the process may take more time when deploying some clusters, Kubernetes, Azure AKS service, or some vast microservice architecture deployments. There may be a little bit of lag I feel, though I cannot tell very strictly that this is a disadvantage, but sometimes it takes a little more time than other cloud infrastructures. All the major things are done by GUI, which is somewhat a little slow. However, if considering automations, process, monitoring, and provisioning, then it is the best cloud service across all the other service providers. Our implementation is a hybrid cloud. Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely easily scalable. I have worked on many Kubernetes infrastructures and microservice deployments, and I have seen that replication is very good because it is very easy. The replication process is very straightforward. I definitely advocate for using less code because it is very time-consuming. If using GCP or Amazon Web Service, there is more interaction related to work over the CLI process. In terms of Microsoft Azure DevOps, there are many things done by the GUI, which is the best part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed."

"At the end of the day, at the end of the year, CA offered the best package overall, and that wasn't just from a product standpoint but also a support standpoint."

"It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment."

"In first pilot run, we achieved five times faster deployment without human work."

"It is a very stable solution and we can rely on pressing a button to perform a full-stack automatic installation that reliably finishes in eight hours instead of a problematic three-week manual installation."

"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably, we get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time, and it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

"You can design your workflows for your needs."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"You get a complete solution with Azure DevOps. You can do everything in one place, starting from requirement gathering until you release the product. It is a reliable, scalable, and handy product."

"The most valuable feature in automating our build and release processes with Azure DevOps is the scheduling capability."

"The features of Azure Repos that we find most impactful are those related to source control management within our DevOps code management processes."

"The most valuable feature is that it brings order to our projects, and we know the status of each one at every moment."

"The integration between the Kanban all the way through, including the traceability all the way through to the other end is very useful."

"Microsoft Azure DevOps integrates well with other components, such as Synapse, which is a data warehouse tool of Azure, and it is a framework platform for BI integrated with other tools, such as Power BI."

"The tool's most efficient feature is the integration of its services in one place. It is an easy-to-use product that improves productivity. Microsoft Azure DevOps is also user-friendly. Its documentation is clear and can be found on Google."

"The most valuable feature is that it's fully integrated, where we have a single place to do everything that we need."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pros

Cons

"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

"The first time setup can be very complicated."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"We're a WebSphere shop so I would like to see more support for WebSphere, only because it's the platform that they seem to want to use the most."

"key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"I would like to see new features added."

"The main issue that I have is the connection speed. Sometimes, the response is too slow. I am based in Taiwan, and I am not sure if it is because of broadband or something else. Its initial configuration is also a little bit difficult."

"The dashboards need bigger with better extensions and layouts. There isn't a workflow related to the statuses on the dashboard; it only lists the statuses and lacks flow."

"Integration and plugins for other tools could be better, like if you want to integrate DevOps with other tools that are in the market."

"While reporting in Azure DevOps is a robust capability, there's always room for enhancement, particularly in providing more granular reports."

"This solution is not as good as Jira when it comes to project management and I think they know it, but it's good enough."

"Its UI can be easier and more customer-friendly. The UI can be improved from the project management and agile perspective."

"A notable improvement would be adding more notifications."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"I don't know what we pay, but I do know what I've seen online. If we switched to JIRA, we will basically have to double our costs because we still have to pay for the DevOps licensing. We're probably spending $100 a month on it. It has only standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is very competitive because of the whole development cycle by Azure DevOps. You don't have to buy and integrate several different tools."

"We do not pay licenses for this solution."

"It's a good tool, quite rich, it has a lot of features, and quite a lot of analytical capabilities which are built on top of it so that you can see how your projects are going and all that stuff. It's a good tool."

"The price of this solution is fair."

"The price is reasonable, but of course, you can find others that are cheaper such as Atlassian."

"The price is cheaper than Jira and some of the other competing tools."

"With Azure, you have to pay for every user."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	68

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity.

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

GitLab vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 51% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 5% of the time

Rally Software vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 4% of the time

Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

April 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure DevOps

April 2026

Download Microsoft Azure DevOps product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers full cycle integration with CI/CD pipelines and a user-friendly interface. It streamlines development processes and supports Agile planning, making it a versatile choice for teams focusing on software development and project management.

Azure DevOps is designed to enhance productivity with its comprehensive project management features, including task management and backlog organization. It supports automation, agile methodologies, and provides seamless integration with Microsoft products. Despite its robust functionalities, users suggest enhancements in customization, integration with external platforms like GitHub and Office 365, as well as advancements in reporting and dashboard functionalities. Azure DevOps plays a key role in CI/CD workflows, code repository management, work item tracking, and test automation, promoting collaboration across distributed teams.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Full Cycle Integration: Manages the entire development lifecycle supporting CI/CD pipelines.
Agile Support: Facilitates agile planning and backlog management for efficient project execution.
Project Management: Offers comprehensive task management features to streamline workflows.
Microsoft Integration: Provides seamless connectivity with other Microsoft tools.
Automation and Reporting: Enhances efficiency through automated processes and reporting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect from Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Increased Productivity: Streamlines development and project management processes.
Scalability: Adapts to the growing needs of development teams and projects.
Customization: Offers extensions to tailor functionalities to meet specific project requirements.
Enhanced Collaboration: Supports distributed teams with effective communication tools.

Microsoft Azure DevOps is widely implemented in industries focusing on software development and IT project management. It is specifically suitable for organizations that prioritize continuous integration, agile practices, and cross-team collaboration. Companies leverage Azure DevOps for managing code repositories, automating builds, and tracking work items, ensuring efficient project delivery in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.