Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Microsoft are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Read 139 Microsoft Azure DevOps reviews

20,261 Views
10,941 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and Microsoft Azure DevOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,473 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure DevOps

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Have built reliable end-to-end pipelines and streamlined cloud provisioning through consistent collaboration practices

I am currently working with open-source tools such as Jenkins for my main CI/CD pipeline, and for enterprise clients, I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps CI/CD pipeline. For other clients, I have also implemented CI/CD YAML pipelines through GitLab CI/CD workflow and GitHub Actions. I am creating the end-to-end CI/CD pipeline from development to deployment and monitoring all of this. Azure Boards is easier than Jira for my understanding because there are very easy points to manage the Agile methodology which we work on. Because it is a GUI, sometimes the process may take a few minutes more than the CLI process since the backend is running the exact CLI, but we are commanding through the GUI. There is definitely a time lag, but it is more secure. Microsoft Azure DevOps pipelines work very seamlessly rather than other CI/CD pipelines, as of my understanding. The downside is that the process may take more time when deploying some clusters, Kubernetes, Azure AKS service, or some vast microservice architecture deployments. There may be a little bit of lag I feel, though I cannot tell very strictly that this is a disadvantage, but sometimes it takes a little more time than other cloud infrastructures. All the major things are done by GUI, which is somewhat a little slow. However, if considering automations, process, monitoring, and provisioning, then it is the best cloud service across all the other service providers. Our implementation is a hybrid cloud. Microsoft Azure DevOps is definitely easily scalable. I have worked on many Kubernetes infrastructures and microservice deployments, and I have seen that replication is very good because it is very easy. The replication process is very straightforward. I definitely advocate for using less code because it is very time-consuming. If using GCP or Amazon Web Service, there is more interaction related to work over the CLI process. In terms of Microsoft Azure DevOps, there are many things done by the GUI, which is the best part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

"It can support very complex environments and dependencies."

"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."

"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."

"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."

"In first pilot run, we achieved five times faster deployment without human work."

"They have gained efficiency that they cannot achieve in any other way."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"Azure enables us to create a staging environment through to a production environment in an easier way and then get the code and run that."

"Broadly speaking, we use the product for .NET websites, APIs, data integration, migration, data analysis, job orders, and workflows."

"The initial setup process is easy."

"Azure Pipeline and Azure Release are most valuable. I use Azure DevOps through pipeline and release."

"I really like the Microsoft DevOps survey."

"It's a great product for the CI/CD process."

"The most valuable feature is that it brings order to our projects, and we know the status of each one at every moment."

"My first impression of DevOps, after using Jira, is that it has a much better, more intuitive, and more user-friendly interface."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pros

Cons

"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

"One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources."

"The first time setup can be very complicated."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"We're a WebSphere shop so I would like to see more support for WebSphere, only because it's the platform that they seem to want to use the most."

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking."

"File transfer is not very efficient. It takes a bit longer than some other methods and when you send the file from one platform to another, especially from the mainframe, the results consumption is quite high compared to other methods."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"The solution could be made faster because it can be a little unnerving to browse through too many pages and press too many buttons."

"The main issue that I have is the connection speed. Sometimes, the response is too slow. I am based in Taiwan, and I am not sure if it is because of broadband or something else. Its initial configuration is also a little bit difficult."

"With the query feature, we have to group items, so it becomes difficult for everyone to understand it. It's easier in JIRA, which has filters and other query options."

"They have brought a lot of new collaboration features in the latest version. We haven't used those features, but they should continue to expand it more on the collaboration front so that two developers can look at the code and work at the same time. It will be helpful for working from home."

"Azure DevOps could be improved with more security plugins, especially for SaaS scanning and vulnerability scans."

"I would like to see better integration and collaboration between tools."

"There are areas of Microsoft Azure DevOps that have room for improvement, mainly regarding personalization capacity."

"The good part is that it's a complete package, but at the same time, once you've gone with them, you don't have much leverage to split out into some other activities because everything is interconnected and entwined by that time, and it would be like a monopoly."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"Its pricing is reasonable for the number of features that you get and the functionality that you can utilize for the agile delivery, which is what we are using it for. I found it extremely cost-effective."

"Licensing cost per user is approximately $11 to $15. We have about 400 users, but not all are active. We have around 200 to 300 active users."

"I find that the pricing is good, and it is competitive with the other vendors in the market."

"The licensing costs are reasonable."

"Microsoft Azure DevOps is an expensive solution."

"We pay a monthly license for Microsoft Azure DevOps."

"The cost is quite affordable."

"We do not pay licenses for this solution."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	70

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

Microsoft Azure DevOps: what is your experience regarding pricing and costs ?

I rate Microsoft Azure DevOps price as a one, which means it is a good value.

See all answers

Comparisons

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 24% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

GitLab vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 40% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 12% of the time

Jira vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 4% of the time

Rally Software vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Azure DevOps

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

August 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure DevOps

August 2026

Download Microsoft Azure DevOps product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

Microsoft Azure DevOps offers full cycle integration with CI/CD pipelines and a user-friendly interface. It streamlines development processes and supports Agile planning, making it a versatile choice for teams focusing on software development and project management.

Azure DevOps is designed to enhance productivity with its comprehensive project management features, including task management and backlog organization. It supports automation, agile methodologies, and provides seamless integration with Microsoft products. Despite its robust functionalities, users suggest enhancements in customization, integration with external platforms like GitHub and Office 365, as well as advancements in reporting and dashboard functionalities. Azure DevOps plays a key role in CI/CD workflows, code repository management, work item tracking, and test automation, promoting collaboration across distributed teams.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Full Cycle Integration: Manages the entire development lifecycle supporting CI/CD pipelines.
Agile Support: Facilitates agile planning and backlog management for efficient project execution.
Project Management: Offers comprehensive task management features to streamline workflows.
Microsoft Integration: Provides seamless connectivity with other Microsoft tools.
Automation and Reporting: Enhances efficiency through automated processes and reporting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect from Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Increased Productivity: Streamlines development and project management processes.
Scalability: Adapts to the growing needs of development teams and projects.
Customization: Offers extensions to tailor functionalities to meet specific project requirements.
Enhanced Collaboration: Supports distributed teams with effective communication tools.

Microsoft Azure DevOps is widely implemented in industries focusing on software development and IT project management. It is specifically suitable for organizations that prioritize continuous integration, agile practices, and cross-team collaboration. Companies leverage Azure DevOps for managing code repositories, automating builds, and tracking work items, ensuring efficient project delivery in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.