Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros and cons

Vendor: Broadcom

4.0 out of 5

13 reviews
86% willing to recommend

819 followers

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Pros review quotes

Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us.

Read full review

DevOps Evangelist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 29, 2017

Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists.

Read full review

DevOps Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment.

Read full review

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Free Report: Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something.

Read full review

MJ

Administrator at a recruiting/HR firm with 10,001+ employees

Jun 28, 2018

The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it.

Read full review

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Jun 28, 2018

It can support very complex environments and dependencies.

Read full review

Managing Partner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jun 28, 2018

The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources.

Read full review

reviewer1127955

Project Manager at a financial services firm

Apr 18, 2020

The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.

Read full review

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Jun 5, 2021

You can design your workflows for your needs.

Read full review

ME

Enterprise Architect at SPAR Business Service GmbH

Jul 15, 2018

It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment.

Read full review

Show 3 more reviews (out of 13)

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Cons review quotes

Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources.

Read full review

DevOps Evangelist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 29, 2017

GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones.

Read full review

DevOps Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

I would like to see more support for WebSphere.

Read full review

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Free Report: Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Nov 26, 2017

key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking.

Read full review

MJ

Administrator at a recruiting/HR firm with 10,001+ employees

Jun 28, 2018

There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system.

Read full review

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Jun 28, 2018

At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2.

Read full review

Managing Partner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jun 28, 2018

The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.

Read full review

reviewer1127955

Project Manager at a financial services firm

Apr 18, 2020

There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.

Read full review

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Jun 5, 2021

The stability of the solution can be improved.

Read full review

ME

Enterprise Architect at SPAR Business Service GmbH

Jul 15, 2018

It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud.

Read full review

Show 2 more reviews (out of 12)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Release Automation

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

GitLab vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Plutora vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Release Automation

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

GitLab vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Plutora vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

See all alternatives

Related questions

12

When evaluating Release Automation, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

141

What is the best suitable solution to deploy in Websphere 8.0?

49

What are the must-have tools for CI/CD?

44

What tips do you have for improving software release management processes?

8

How to estimate whether using the AWS services is worthwhile for saving time and money for manufacturing at a retailer company?

30

What are the main challenges of implementing a deployment pipeline?