Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

2,872 Views
1,314 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and UrbanCode Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UrbanCode Deploy

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (12th)

Featured Reviews

it_user779229

Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results

Our most important criteria when selecting a vendor are * the size of the vendor itself * how stable the company is * how long they have been in the market * what product suites they have that can help us achieve our goal at the end of the day. We look for partners, not vendors per se, that can help us implement our vision with us, and that's why we like Automic. I give it a good nine out of 10 at this time. The one piece that I think that could help leverage more of the tool is the scripting language barrier at this time. If that's not there, and some of the pieces that could be delivered faster, it might be adopted more out there in the market. I would suggest look at the complete offering that's out there. I would suggest: Prove it out first with the use case that you have. We were not shy in terms of running some proofs of concept with a couple of big vendors out there, and then making them make the case why their product suits our use case. And don't be shy to restart if there is something that you think is not going right, make sure you fix the problem before it gets too late.

Read full review

reviewer887301

Software Engineering Director at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Versatile solution with the powerful functionality to automate the execution of deployments

The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take a long to resolve. The cost of the solution is high. It would be good to have the support of public cloud services like Azure. My team has also had some concerns around security when using this solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."

"The capability to provide visibility to the stakeholders, to management, is the biggest piece that showcases what the solution is about."

"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."

"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."

"I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something."

"It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use."

"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."

"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

Cons

"One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

40%

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Educational Organization

66%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Comparisons

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 31% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 18% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 9% of the time

BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

December 2024

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

November 2024

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

uDeploy

Learn More

Broadcom

IBM

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.