Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

2,939 Views
1,363 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and UrbanCode Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UrbanCode Deploy

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (6th)

Featured Reviews

it_user779229

Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results

Our most important criteria when selecting a vendor are * the size of the vendor itself * how stable the company is * how long they have been in the market * what product suites they have that can help us achieve our goal at the end of the day. We look for partners, not vendors per se, that can help us implement our vision with us, and that's why we like Automic. I give it a good nine out of 10 at this time. The one piece that I think that could help leverage more of the tool is the scripting language barrier at this time. If that's not there, and some of the pieces that could be delivered faster, it might be adopted more out there in the market. I would suggest look at the complete offering that's out there. I would suggest: Prove it out first with the use case that you have. We were not shy in terms of running some proofs of concept with a couple of big vendors out there, and then making them make the case why their product suits our use case. And don't be shy to restart if there is something that you think is not going right, make sure you fix the problem before it gets too late.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."

"I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something."

"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it."

"It can support very complex environments and dependencies."

"The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources."

"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"I would say our headwind, or our time to market, is reduced considerably. We get more consistent results out of it, because you write one time and once it's automated you expect it to behave the same way every time. And it cut down a lot of re-work for us."

"The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

Cons

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together."

"GUI for mobile phones: Availability to approve and start deployment through mobile phones."

"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

"I would like to see more support for WebSphere."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Educational Organization

65%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UrbanCode Deploy?

The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UrbanCode Deploy?

The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing. For example, driving to your home from the office is easy when there are one or two routes. With twenty routes, there is s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UrbanCode Deploy?

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company.

See all answers

Comparisons

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 19% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 8% of the time

BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

November 2024

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

October 2024

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

uDeploy

Learn More

Broadcom

IBM

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.