Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automox vs Lacework comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Automox customer support is highly praised for its responsiveness, knowledge, and attentiveness, often viewed as a valuable partnership.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Automox needs to improve profile syncing, notifications, access control, inventory, multi-group policies, workstation access, and patch bandwidth reduction.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automox handles numerous endpoints efficiently, though some users report challenges with multi-tenant manageability, load times, and minor issues.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Automox offers cost-effective endpoint management at around $2 per month with support for multiple OS and straightforward licensing.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Automox is highly stable, fast, and reliable, with prompt maintenance and mostly positive user experiences in a cloud-based environment.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
Automox offers cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, intuitive interface, robust patch management, automation, and enhances workflow efficiency with seamless deployments.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Automox
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
46th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (55th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (18th), Patch Management (14th)
Lacework
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (12th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (10th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (12th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (10th), Compliance Management (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lacework is 1.5%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Jack Leung - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use and deploy agents but needs more stability
We just need to deploy the agent to the endpoints. We don't need to set up anything. For a single agent, it takes one or two minutes. However, we deployed globally, and you need to take into consideration the time it will take to deploy across each endpoint. It's very simple to deploy. We had three or four engineers take care of the implementation.
Robert Croteau - PeerSpot reviewer
It provides a good overview of our security posture
The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine. They have to go in and put their policies in place. It's hard for them to implement that, especially if they don't have a real security team. The team's policymakers don't do anything. Lacework takes out all the noise and gives them bits of things that actually matter with the application after it learns the behavior.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Automox?
It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?
We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.
What needs improvement with Automox?
They need to improve the automation features. It could be more stable.
What do you like most about Lacework?
Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invalua...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?
My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz.
What needs improvement with Lacework?
The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modul...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Polygraph
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.
Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Lacework and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.