AWS Application Migration Service vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 in CM , with an average rating of 9.5, and holds a 4.4% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #3 in DRS , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

AWS Application Migration S...

Read 7 AWS Application Migration Service reviews

615 Views
535 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

6,033 Views
5,128 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS Application Migration S...

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Application Migration Service and VMware Live Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, CTERA and others in Cloud Migration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,076 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (10th)

VMware Live Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

AWS Application Migration Service and VMware Live Recovery aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Application Migration Service is designed for Cloud Migration and holds a mindshare of 4.4%, up 3.0% compared to last year.
VMware Live Recovery, on the other hand, focuses on Disaster Recovery (DR) Software, holds 7.4% mindshare, down 9.4% since last year.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Application Migration Service	4.4%
Nasuni	6.7%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	6.5%
Other	82.4%

Cloud Migration

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.4%
Veeam Data Platform	12.8%
Commvault Cloud	8.7%
Other	71.1%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Dieudonné-Nsabimana

Consultancy Manager at cidns

Integration with other services has improved migration efficiency

A valuable feature is the schema conversion tool, which allows me to migrate databases, for example, from Oracle to Postgres. The service is fully managed by AWS, which makes it better to use the migration services. It is beneficial to enable phased migration, and the service offers easy integration with other AWS services. The integration of AWS Application Migration Service with AWS makes it a good tool for working with AWS services.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations."

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"Our systems fail over using SRM. So, we do a big bang DR, which is biannual, and we fail over our fairly massive Epic electronic health record (EHR) and our core applications. It takes us about 30 minutes to fail over using SRM, which is pretty good. In most hospitals that have Epic installed, Epic does the audit to make sure that we can fail over if something were to happen. Normally, sites will have a DR solution specific to the EHR, but right now, our pain point is the third-party tier-one clinical applications."

"The stability of SRM has been excellent. It gets a nine-out-of-ten."

"Virtual Machine Recovery during DR situation, with automation and easy to use menus and options."

"We mostly prefer to recommend this to customers due to ease of use, abundant features, and support."

"It has a good and effective user interface."

"VMware's tech support gets a nine-out-of-ten. They are responsive and get you a useful reply."

"We find the back up feature of this solution to be particularly valuable."

"The product is evolving and the vendor is committed to change."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service."

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"The back sites sometimes are very, very complicated."

"The solution currently has a five-minute RPO, meaning if the VM goes down we can lose up to five minutes of data which is a big deal when it relates to database replication."

"We've had configuration issues on occasion. We start to fail over, and then we have to call it off because the configuration is not right, or the data stores aren't configured correctly in the secondary data center. Oftentimes, it is just the experience level of the team, and we have to bring in the vendor to help and validate our configuration."

"The infrastructure of the solution needs to be more software-based"

"They could enhance the automation features for the product."

"This product is not appropriate for those moving to a broader cloud footprint."

"The technical support is not quick enough to respond when a user tries to contact them."

"Lacks stability and as a result requires continuous monitoring."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Live Migration's price is good."

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"The level of licensing required for this solution is dependent on the server instances in use."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight to nine out of ten."

"We have a standard enterprise license for the solution."

"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."

"The software is expensive. There is a one-time cost involved in purchasing the license."

"The cost of SRM is a little bit high, especially for smaller companies."

"Licensing costs explode after 75 VMs."

"VMware SRM is expensive when compared to Veeam and makes Veeam look cheaper. For support, some additional payments need to be made over the licensing costs of the solution."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps. Furthermore, I noticed that performance can vary with the source and t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

For the moment, I am using AWS Application Migration Service for database migration. The first use case involves moving from on-premise to EC2 hosts. Additionally, I have worked with multi-region r...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The service is not complicated; I find it easy to use. For those considering AWS Application Migration Service, the advice depends on their specific needs. If it involves database migration, especi...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

Racemi Cloud Path vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 24% of the time

Hexaware Amaze vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 23% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Migrate vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 11% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 35% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 18% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

February 2026

AWS Application Migration Service report

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

February 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service minimizes time-intensive, error-prone manual processes by automating the conversion of your source servers to run natively on AWS. It also simplifies application modernization with built-in and custom optimization options.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, CTERA and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.