AWS Application Migration Service vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #10 in CM , with an average rating of 9.5, and holds a 4.4% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #3 in DRS , with an average rating of 8.1, and holds a 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

AWS Application Migration S...

Read 7 AWS Application Migration Service reviews

615 Views
535 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

6,033 Views
5,128 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS Application Migration S...

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Application Migration Service and VMware Live Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, CTERA and others in Cloud Migration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,728 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Application Migration S...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (10th)

VMware Live Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

AWS Application Migration Service and VMware Live Recovery aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Application Migration Service is designed for Cloud Migration and holds a mindshare of 4.4%, up 3.0% compared to last year.
VMware Live Recovery, on the other hand, focuses on Disaster Recovery (DR) Software, holds 7.4% mindshare, down 9.4% since last year.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Application Migration Service	4.4%
Nasuni	6.7%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	6.5%
Other	82.4%

Cloud Migration

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.4%
Veeam Data Platform	12.8%
Commvault Cloud	8.7%
Other	71.1%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Dieudonné-Nsabimana

Consultancy Manager at cidns

Integration with other services has improved migration efficiency

A valuable feature is the schema conversion tool, which allows me to migrate databases, for example, from Oracle to Postgres. The service is fully managed by AWS, which makes it better to use the migration services. It is beneficial to enable phased migration, and the service offers easy integration with other AWS services. The integration of AWS Application Migration Service with AWS makes it a good tool for working with AWS services.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I rate AWS Application Migration Service a nine out of ten overall."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."

"CloudEndure is a product that I recommend to my customers because it's very easy to implement, configure, and use."

"Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."

"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."

More AWS Application Migration Service pros

"The disaster recovery has been good; in the case of a disaster, the product is very simple, we have security and lower downtime, and it's very reliable."

"It has a good and effective user interface."

"I like how VMware SRM is able to automate and orchestrate disaster recovery."

"Site Recovery Manager is valuable because it helps with the difficult problem of failing a group of virtual machines over to your DR site and bringing them up."

"The solution is consistent."

"As you can see, Site Recovery Manager 6.1 introduces fundamental characteristics that achieve levels of automation until now never seen on the platform, as well as a detailed and comprehensive policy-based control that seamlessly integrate with NSX to offer really amazing capabilities for disaster recovery while everything can be done in half the time it took before."

"The product is evolving and the vendor is committed to change."

"Combined with RecoverPoint, it offers zero RPO and zero RTO."

More VMware Live Recovery pros

Cons

"The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."

"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."

"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."

"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."

"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."

More AWS Application Migration Service cons

"Technical support can take some time to respond."

"The administration guides can be complicated and difficult to use, so it would be helpful if it was made easier."

"Licensing costs explode after 75 VMs."

"Zerto may be more cost efficient, so I’m not 100% sold, and may not need it at all."

"I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring."

"Sometimes it can cause a bit of downtime during switchovers."

"I personally will not continue using the VMware SRM solution."

"The version we are currently using is not the latest and greatest but it has buggy behavior in some browsers."

More VMware Live Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Live Migration's price is good."

"For me, the price of the tool is cheap and very good. It is flexible pricing since you pay just for what you use."

"Compare to hardware-based replication, I think software based replication is best and cheap."

"The price of VMware SRM depends on how many VMs the customer has to move. There is a difference between the standard and enterprise license. I'm presenting the standard license to my customers because the total of VMs is not more than 50. The customer needs only the standard license and the cost is very effective for him."

"SRM is reasonably priced for the functionality it provides."

"VMware sells in bundles of 50 VMs, so if we want to expand, we have to buy the whole bundle."

"The price could be lower, in general. My clients pay for an annual license."

"The cost of SRM is a little bit high, especially for smaller companies."

"The cost of SRM is on par with market rates."

"The price of VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery should be lowered in order to compete better in the market."

More VMware Live Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Live Migration?

The schema conversion is not included in the document management services itself. Complex formations require additional steps. Furthermore, I noticed that performance can vary with the source and t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Live Migration?

For the moment, I am using AWS Application Migration Service for database migration. The first use case involves moving from on-premise to EC2 hosts. Additionally, I have worked with multi-region r...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudEndure Live Migration?

The service is not complicated; I find it easy to use. For those considering AWS Application Migration Service, the advice depends on their specific needs. If it involves database migration, especi...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

Racemi Cloud Path vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 26% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 21% of the time

Hexaware Amaze vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Migrate vs AWS Application Migration Service

Compared 11% of the time

More AWS Application Migration Service Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 34% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

March 2026

AWS Application Migration Service report

Download AWS Application Migration Service product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

March 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Live Migration

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

AWS Application Migration Service minimizes time-intensive, error-prone manual processes by automating the conversion of your source servers to run natively on AWS. It also simplifies application modernization with built-in and custom optimization options.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, CTERA and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.