AWS Fargate vs Heroku comparison

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"Fargate's integration with other AWS services is really good."

"Fargate itself is a stable product. We are quite satisfied with its performance."

"By using a server's compute resources, one can observe the resource metrics. With AWS, one can determine when servers will be used based on CloudWatch results. For example, CloudWatch informs the application and service platform when the hit ratio has reached the threshold value."

"If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ease of use."

"Fargate is beneficial for hosting our solutions and providing workflow management, creating legal documents, and delivering business intelligence."

"AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the auto maintenance of databases."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"The product is stable."

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

"One of the best things about Heroku is that it is very easy and straightforward to deploy an application."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards."

"Service computing is not as straightforward compared to other computing services. It requires more effort to use effectively."

"AWS Fargate needs improvement in terms of setup complexity."

"I heard from my team that it's not easy to predict the cost. That is the only issue we have with AWS Fargate, but I think that's acceptable. AWS Fargate isn't user-friendly. Anything related to Software as a Service or microservice architecture is not easy to implement. You're required to have DevOps from your side to implement the solution. AWS Fargate is just a temporary solution for us. When we grow to a certain level, we may use AKS for better control."

"We faced challenges in vertically scaling our workload."

"We would like to see some improvement in the process documents that are provided with this product, particularly for auto-scaling and other configuration tools that are a bit complicated."

"There is a tool named Compose that helps in converting the Docker Compose file into a Kubernetes file. For ECS and Fargate, AWS reads a Dockerfile and helps with conversion. However, I am uncertain if it's ready for deployment after conversion."

"Sometimes, Fargate can be really hard to configure."

"Challenges include higher costs for smaller clients, limited control over underlying infrastructure customization, and potential latencies during task startup."

"They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more."

"Their support is good, but they can improve their response time."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

"The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly."

"The tool's configuration is complex."

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"The tool is free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"Its price is very good."