Heroku vs Microsoft Azure comparison

Heroku and Microsoft are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Heroku is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Heroku holds a 2.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft’s 21.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Heroku users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Heroku

Read 29 Heroku reviews

2,676 Views
2,030 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Read 312 Microsoft Azure reviews

22,902 Views
17,839 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Heroku

Microsoft Azure

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Heroku compete in the cloud computing space, each offering unique strengths. Azure appears to have the upper hand due to its wide array of features and extensive service offerings, appealing to large-scale, enterprise scenarios despite its complex pricing.

Features: Microsoft Azure provides high scalability, diverse service integrations, and strong hybrid cloud support, offering a versatile platform for a wide range of applications. It supports multiple programming languages and has global data center availability, making it suitable for enterprise needs. Heroku, while feature-limited compared to Azure, offers easy application deployment, seamless GitHub integration, and a focus on simplicity and speed, which is beneficial for development workflows.

Room for Improvement: Azure faces challenges with complex pricing models, an intricate UI, and technical limitations such as resource constraints and integration issues. Concerns also exist about physical security and relative high costs. On the other hand, Heroku has scalability limitations, server issues, and escalating costs as deployments grow, with inadequate Docker support on CI infrastructure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure's broad service range allows for diverse deployment options suitable for public and hybrid cloud models, though support can be complex and slow unless escalated. Heroku excels in straightforward setups and fast customer support, enhancing developer experiences with smooth integration and management.

Pricing and ROI: Azure offers flexible pay-as-you-go pricing but is often criticized for opaque pricing structures and higher costs, offset by substantial ROI in large enterprise scenarios. Heroku’s straightforward pricing is advantageous for small to medium projects with low upfront costs but can quickly increase with higher resource demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 829,541 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Heroku

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

312

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Heroku is 2.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 21.3%, up from 20.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Faizan Haider

Senior Software Engineer at Aldaim Solutions

Used for server deployment and provides auto maintenance of databases

Heroku is deployed on the cloud. We can deploy our private and public projects over at Heroku. Most of the time, when we are starting any new project from scratch, we have to implement our MVP for that project or the core idea. We are unsure how our traffic flow will go or the actual production environment requirements. We don't want to spend the most on the server sites, so then we can use it with our go-to plan for Heroku, and all the resources are available in the basic plan with the minimum expenses. So, it helps us to deploy and make our features available online at the minimum cost. Once we know our needs, we can add the professional add-ons and shift it to another platform. Heroku supports any resource listed in the marketplace. We just have to deploy our AI solutions, and Heroku can also support AI projects. I would recommend the solution to other users. I advise users not to purchase extra add-ons but to make scalable resources so that they can use all the resources efficiently. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Nicolas Chabrier

Cloud Strategy B2B leader at Sunrise UPC

Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration

The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"We use Heroku to run generic data. We also use it for our customer development environment. It helps us to build and test websites."

"It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the auto maintenance of databases."

"One of the best things about Heroku is that it is very easy and straightforward to deploy an application."

"The product is stable."

More Heroku pros

"Easy to deploy services"

"The monitoring features are very good."

"We validate customer videos and speech in real-time by utilizing language translation services and image processing. This involves converting speech to text and vice versa in real-time. Customers record videos where they speak predefined text. We capture the image and speech, convert it to text, and compare it with the standardized text."

"Microsoft Azure provides many critical features, such as business continuity and disaster recovery, which come embedded out of the box. From my point of view, managing the whole infrastructure, these features have been very beneficial. The support is also amazing, with someone allocated to assist within a few minutes."

"Azure is very user friendly. I was able to create some database servers really fast. The user interface is intuitive."

"The integration with Databricks is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"I think the single sign-on functionality and the ease with which you can deposit things on the cloud have been valuable. Azure has very robust security functionalities and authentication features, which come with mobility, along with backup and credential checks."

"We are using Microsoft Azure because our organization uses a lot of Microsoft solutions. We have used Microsoft technology for a long time and we have internal engineers with great capability that understand the technology. This is why Azure is the best for us."

More Microsoft Azure pros

Cons

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"I think this solution would be improved if free demos were available indefinitely."

"Heroku should increase its slug size limits."

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure."

"We would like to be notified when something goes wrong in the process. When something is not working, we should get an alert."

"They could flesh out some of their analytics a little more."

"The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

More Heroku cons

"I think better accelerators and better tools that can be used to migrate and leverage the existing models and data schemas are needed."

"They are a bit closed on the customization side. If they open the customization then it will be very good."

"The interface is not easy to use. I'd like to see them develop a better interface, more graphical information about the resource and the consumer."

"The solution’s learning curve could be improved."

"Microsoft Azure could improve by having the availability be 100%. Which is difficult, but not impossible."

"Overall, the solution is good but there are some minor technical issues that can be resolved."

"It would be beneficial if Microsoft could enhance the free version to allow for more exploration and development. That's my only suggestion regarding Azure."

"I would like to see more advanced functionality in terms of information security."

More Microsoft Azure cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is very good."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"The tool is free."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"As of now, there are no monthly or yearly subscription fees."

"We have an annual license subscription to use the solution."

"If you are not aware of costs, pricing, etc., you can end up with a hefty bill. However, I found that the Azure price calculator is a valuable tool to use before starting to deploy VMs in Azure. This tool will give you an overview of the costs you should expect on a monthly, quarterly or yearly basis."

"The license cost could be reduced."

"Price is good and many free features available"

"We are on an annual subscription. However, there are other options available."

"The cost of the solution could be reduced. However, I am using the free version."

"It's a metered environment, and it's pay-as-you-go. That's the big challenge with a metered environment."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

829,541 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

44%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Heroku?

I like the tool's scalability, CLI, and dashboards.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Heroku?

I don't like that the web server crashes every day, every 24 hours. The pricing could be improved because scaling the database becomes costly. The Docker features are not great. You cannot use any ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Heroku?

We use the solution for web applications and web APIs.

See all answers

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Heroku

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Heroku

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Heroku

Compared 7% of the time

Google App Engine vs Heroku

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Heroku

Compared 6% of the time

More Heroku Competitors

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 12% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 10% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Heroku

December 2024

Download Heroku product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

December 2024

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Also Known As

No data available

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

Learn More

Heroku

Microsoft

Overview

Established in 2007, Heroku is a cloud application platform providing a streamlined, efficient place for web app developers to create and deploy their applications. Heroku is designed to maximize developer productivity. With the entire web application development process available on the Herokucloud, creating and rolling out web apps has been made more efficient, convenient, and cost-effective than ever before.

Windows Azure is Microsoft's cloud platform, where developers can create, deploy, and maintain their apps. This cloud application platform allows developers to concentrate on the actual applications, while it takes care of all the elements behind the apps.

Windows Azure works across multiple frameworks and languages. It is fully scalable, localized in that it is hosted globally in many datacenters, and has widespread capabilities with elements of application development, deployment, and management.

Azure is comprised of several different service modules, including Infrastructure; Web; Mobile; Dev & Test; Big Data; Media;Storage, Backup & Recovery; and Identity & Access Management.

Microsoft Azure works as a:

Platform as a service (PaaS)
Software as a service (SaaS)
Infrastructure as a service (IaaS)

Microsoft Azure is available:

On-premises
Hybrid
Multi-cloud
At the edge

Compared to its competitors, Microsoft Azure:

Has more affordable features
Has easier migration for organizations already using other Microsoft tools
Has several educational resources available
Provides robust support
Is ideal for small and large businesses

Microsoft Azure Features:

Scalability
Stability
Flexibility
Azure Site Recovery
Active Directory
Monitoring features
Cloud-based
Automated tasks
Change capability cadence
Showback capabilities
Information protection
Azure Data Lake
Excellent portal
Intuitive user interface
Remote desktop
Fast provisioning
Data security
Data resiliency
Speed of service
Integrated delivery pipeline
Disaster recovery
Robust templates
Flexible coding languages
Virtual systems testing

Benefits of Microsoft Azure:

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): Because Microsoft Azure is an IaaS, organizations can deploy as well as manage applications easily and quickly. Azure also provides you with the ability to customize the cloud software to meet your specific business needs.
Seamless integration: Microsoft Azure is built to seamlessly integrate with existing IT departments via hybrid databases, secure private connections, and storage solutions.
Cost-effective: Because Azure can harmoniously exist in your business environment with your data center, it is a very cost-effective solution.
Analytics support: Azure is designed with built-in support that is used to analyze data and provide key insights. Azure offers Cortana Analytics, Stream Analytics, Machine Learning, and SQL services.
Unique storage system: Compared to other cloud services, Microsoft Azure has more data centers and delivery points, which helps create an optimal user experience and also helps deliver content faster. In addition, Microsoft Azure makes it possible for organizations to exchange content across several virtual machines.
Enhanced flexibility: Azure provides extreme flexibility by allowing you to choose any level of functionality you require. It also supports many of the same technologies IT teams and developers usually depend on, making it easier for them to manage.
Easy implementation: Microsoft Azure is easy and quick to deploy. If necessary, you can change web apps to Azure with almost zero downtime.

Reviews from Real Users:

"It is a flexible solution that is straightforward to use," says the principal consultant at a computer software company.

OmarJ., future datacenter consultant: Microsoft Azure Cloud at a tech company, adds that "The user interface is very nice and makes everything easy to use."

“You can build an environment in minutes. It's very good in terms of being an infrastructure as a service, and I found that really fascinating,” says an information technology consultant at a computer software company.

"I think Azure's level of automation to achieve efficiency or agility is valuable. I also like the change capability cadence, the showback capabilities, and understanding what our costs are," says an enterprise architect at an energy/utilities company.

Marco C., Ing. at Wolters Kluwer, says "The valuable features of Microsoft Azure are that it is cloud-based and has good storage. The storage is completely managed by Azure. We do not need to do any patching of security because it is handled by Azure which is a benefit. The solution is fully compatible with the Microsoft technology stack and is very scalable."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is it has everything together in one place. It is one large tool with lots of small tools that are updated often," says the owner of a media company.

Sample Customers

Facebook, UrbanDictionary, Code for America, Mailchimp, Rapportive, GitHub, TED, and Lyft.

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Buyer's Guide

Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure

January 2025

Free Report: Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure

Find out what your peers are saying about Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

829,541 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Heroku vs. Microsoft Azure report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.