AWS Firewall Manager vs Cisco Security Cloud Control comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cisco are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Cisco is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.3% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Cisco’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

951 Views
951 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Read 15 Cisco Security Cloud Control reviews

806 Views
806 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Cisco Security Cloud Control and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the network security management category. Cisco seems to have the upper hand due to its strength in policy and device management.

Features: Cisco Security Cloud Control is known for centralized upgrades, secure cloud storage, and policy management across multiple devices. AWS Firewall Manager provides auto-scaling, real-time threat detection, and strong compliance management.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Security Cloud Control can improve its analytics, expand third-party device support, and enhance reporting functionalities. AWS Firewall Manager should focus on improving its user interface, streamlining feature use, and better integrating threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Security Cloud Control supports public, private, and on-premises environments with highly regarded technical support. AWS Firewall Manager targets public and hybrid cloud environments, with technical support enhancing its robust setup.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Security Cloud Control is considered expensive but justified by its security benefits and time savings, offering notable ROI. AWS Firewall Manager's pricing is competitive but may be costly with bundled services, operating on a pay-as-you-go model for flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,346 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.3%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Security Cloud Control is 2.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Firewall Manager	3.3%
Cisco Security Cloud Control	2.5%
Other	94.2%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

Francisco Delos Santos

Security Engineer at Metrobank

Automation reduces intervention and speeds up threat prevention

Our primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator is the automation of playbooks. We primarily use it for this purpose to streamline processes The most valuable feature is the automation, as it reduces user intervention and allows us to focus on other tasks. Since the system is automated,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"The product is highly reliable."

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"We use a lot of image upgrades. We take some 20 devices and then we update everything at once, including the policies. We apply policies for groups. For certain groups, like anti-viruses, we send out policies and apply them to every single device. It's really easy and simple."

"If our server is blocked, this solution shows us why it is blocked and allows us to update the network routing."

"When we're looking to the policies, it identifies the shadow rules. It notifies us about anything that will supersede other rules."

"For this product, they are very uncharacteristically interested in resolving whatever issue the customer reports. They're really attentive, and they address whatever we bring up as quickly as they can. That's been a very positive aspect of the product."

"I like the upgrade feature. That is pretty valuable to me because I have dual ASAs and when I go through CDO it does it for me pretty well. It's all done in the back-end and I don't really have to be involved. I just initiate, pick the image, and I pick when I want it done and it just does it, whether I have a single ASA or have a dual ASA."

"The most valuable feature is the automation, as it reduces user intervention and allows us to focus on other tasks."

"The initial setup was straightforward. We spun up the VM onsite. We generated the key that it needed to talk to the Cloud Orchestrator. After that, as I started adding devices, it was relatively quick and easy."

"There are a lot of templates that are already built-in. They give you quick-to-create and quick-to-apply policies that are typically a little more complicated for people."

More Cisco Security Cloud Control pros

Cons

"The system should be more customizable."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"The main thing that would useful for us would the logging and monitoring. I have to check it out, to get the beta, because I don't have access to them... I wanted CDO to be a central place so where I could do everything but right now I don't think that's possible. I really don't want to go back and forth between this and FMC. Maybe the logging portion, when I look at it, will give me some similarities."

"We had some MX devices that were blocking Windows Update from happening. We found out it was a Meraki issue, but it would have been nice if it had been flagged for us: "Hey, these updates are failing because the MX is blocking it." It wasn't a huge problem, but there was a loss of our time as well as the fact that the updates didn't get pushed out... It would have been nice if CDO had let us know that that was an issue."

"The dashboard needs to be more customizable to provide better reporting for our network."

"I'd like CDO to be the one-stop-shop where we could do all the configurations easily. It would be nice, for ASA upgrades, if we could do them from a central repository and not have to reach out to Cisco. That would be a definite plus."

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall. Currently, to use it effectively, one must be specific with the rule set that needs to be set up."

"It would be a better product if it incorporated device control for third-party products easily."

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall."

"They need to work on the user interface. It needs to be improved to make it more user-friendly."

More Cisco Security Cloud Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"The AWS Firewall Manager is a little on the costly side."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"It is covered under the CIsco Enterprise License Agreement (ELA). So, it is licensed and ours."

"I work with a lot of clients, and the price or value of the Cisco Defense Orchestrator can vary from one client to another. If you have a lot of Cisco solutions, the price of the Cisco Defense Orchestrator is justified. Whereas if you have some security components from other vendors, such as Check Point or Palo Alto. This solution would be a pretty expensive proposition considering that they don't integrate with them well."

"After our free trial was done we got a subscription for three years and it was under $3,000 or so. It's part of the EA we already paid for, so I don't know what it would be if it was a la carte."

"It is about a $100 per year for an ASA 5506 firewall, and from there it keeps going up if you have a bigger box. For example, the 5516 is $200 to $300 per year."

"It's around £500 per unit for a three-year license."

"If you compare to what is available on the market, they are in the same range with respect to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Hospitality Company

Computer Software Company

28%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AWS Firewall Manager has been straightforward. There is no separate licensing cost for AWS Firewall Manager itself. It is included with AWS...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My main use case for AWS Firewall Manager is centrally managing and enforcing security policies across multiple AWS accounts. It helps me to ensure consistent WAF rules, security group policies, an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall. Currently, to use it effectively, one must be specific with the rule set that needs to be set up. Additionally, I suggest impro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Our primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator is the automation of playbooks. We primarily use it for this purpose to streamline processes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Those who want to use Cisco Defense Orchestrator should build their own use case and see if it fits their environment. The most significant benefit for us is the response time because it automates ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 41% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 14% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 8% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 20% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 12% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 12% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 10% of the time

More Cisco Security Cloud Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

January 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Security Cloud Control

January 2026

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco Defense Orchestrator, CDO

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your entire infrastructure.

Using AWS Firewall Manager, you can easily roll out AWS WAF rules for your Application Load Balancers, API Gateways, and Amazon CloudFront distributions. Similarly, you can create AWS Shield Advanced protections for your Application Load Balancers, ELB Classic Load Balancers, Elastic IP Addresses and CloudFront distributions. Finally, with AWS Firewall Manager, you can enable security groups for your Amazon EC2 and ENI resource types in Amazon VPCs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized management, real-time visibility, and AI-driven automation for on-premises and cloud environments, simplifying scalability and deployment.

With a unified approach, Cisco Security Cloud Control enhances security posture by providing cross-platform insights across Cisco's ecosystem. It accelerates threat detection and optimizes policy enforcement through a blend of AI automation and natural language querying capabilities. The intuitive platform serves multiple devices, enabling comprehensive management of Secure Firewall, Secure Access, and other services with guidance from the Cisco AI Assistant. It also includes an AI Operations feature that identifies critical issues and provides real-time insights, enhancing response times while a policy analyzer improves security hygiene by detecting and closing security gaps. Its automation minimizes manual tasks, secures cloud-stored configurations, and supports two-factor authentication. However, it could benefit from improvements in navigation clarity, bulk change handling, and expanded third-party integrations.

What are the key features of Cisco Security Cloud Control?

Centralized Device Control: Streamlines management with bulk policy upgrades and automation.
AI-Driven Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances threat detection.
Network Visibility: Provides insights with valuable reporting and intrusion prevention.
Intuitive Configuration: Enables easy policy adjustments and restoration of secure connections.

What benefits can users anticipate?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational overhead with centralized management.
Improved Security: Enhances protection through automated policy enforcement and AI insights.
Time Savings: Simplifies management of multiple devices in cloud and on-premises environments.
Scalability: Supports growth with ease of deployment and policy consistency.

Industries implementing Cisco Security Cloud Control leverage its capabilities for tasks ranging from firewall management to intrusion prevention. Enterprises use it to streamline policy management, automate configurations, and integrate Cisco devices with cloud strategies, benefiting from simplified security orchestration and network segmentation.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Insurance Company of British Columbia, Shawmut

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.