AWS Firewall Manager vs Cisco Security Cloud Control comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Cisco are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Cisco is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.6% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Cisco’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 12 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,277 Views
1,277 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Read 14 Cisco Security Cloud Control reviews

1,828 Views
1,828 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Cisco Security Cloud Control and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the security solutions category. Cisco has an upper hand in centralized rule management and device support, while AWS leads with integration and a cost-effective pricing model.

Features: Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized control of multiple devices, automated upgrades, and detailed reports. It supports ASA, FTD, and Meraki MX devices with encryption during storage and transit. AWS Firewall Manager provides auto-scaling, detailed analytics, and native integration with AWS services like WAF and Shield Advanced, supporting compliance monitoring and automated policy applications across AWS environments.

Room for Improvement: Cisco users desire better change visibility, reporting, and third-party integrations, facing challenges with bulk changes and analytics inconsistencies. Improvements in user interaction are suggested. AWS Firewall Manager can be overwhelming due to numerous features, with users requesting enhancements in logging, user interface, and threat intelligence integration. They emphasize a need for a more intuitive setup and reporting functionality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Security Cloud Control is praised for its tech support, crucial in addressing issues and improving product design. It supports Public and Private Cloud environments but lacks hybrid cloud support. AWS Firewall Manager mainly operates in Public Cloud environments, offering consistent and responsive technical support during deployments. Both products are commended for customer service, though Cisco tends to have a more direct feedback loop with its development team.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco's pricing is considered high but justified by its robust features, saving technician time by streamlining operations. AWS provides a cost-efficient pay-as-you-go model, accommodating various business needs with built-in cost governance. Cisco's ROI is seen through improved operation efficiency and reduced incidents. AWS offers competitive pricing balancing cost with AWS services, with users highlighting immediate value and seamless integration with existing AWS infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Security Cloud Control

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.6%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Security Cloud Control is 4.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Firewall Manager	3.6%
Cisco Security Cloud Control	4.0%
Other	92.4%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

Francisco Delos Santos

Security Engineer at Metrobank

Automation reduces intervention and speeds up threat prevention

Our primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator is the automation of playbooks. We primarily use it for this purpose to streamline processes The most valuable feature is the automation, as it reduces user intervention and allows us to focus on other tasks. Since the system is automated,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

"The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

"From a technical perspective, it is a good product."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"The most valuable feature is being able to do centralized upgrades on the ASAs. We can select all of those ASAs, and say, "Upgrade these ASAs at this scheduled time." It will copy down the ASA image, ASDM image, and then do the upgrade and failovers, and then put it all back into service as required at a scheduled time. It automates that process for us."

"The bulk changes feature is definitely the most valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the Intrusion prevention."

"If we have a firewall go down, I can hop into CDO, pull the latest configuration off and apply it. That's really good. It helps save time."

"The initial setup was straightforward; we spun up the VM onsite, generated the key that it needed to talk to the Cloud Orchestrator, and after that, as I started adding devices, it was relatively quick and easy."

"The main return on investment is time, and the first time a firewall went down the savings probably exceeded what CDO costs."

"For one particular client, we had almost a 20 percent remediation on some of their equipment as a result of all kinds of attacks from the desktop department, and we got them down to a zero percent remediation."

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator is a very great solution to centralizing device management and security."

More Cisco Security Cloud Control pros

Cons

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."

"The system should be more customizable."

"AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"There could be some slight improvements to navigation."

"I'd like CDO to be the one-stop-shop where we could do all the configurations easily. It would be nice, for ASA upgrades, if we could do them from a central repository and not have to reach out to Cisco. That would be a definite plus."

"They can also provide an on-premises solution. Currently, Cisco Defense Orchestrator is just for cloud deployments, not for on-premises deployments."

"They need to work on the user interface. It needs to be improved to make it more user-friendly."

"If I make a change locally to the firewall, CDO gives an alarm or an error message and says there's a change in compliance: "The firewall has this configuration but the last time it was compiled it had that configuration." That view of new changes versus the old could be better... I had to log in manually, locally on the firewall, to check which version, which configuration was actually running. I couldn't see it in CDO."

"We had some MX devices that were blocking Windows Update from happening. We found out it was a Meraki issue, but it would have been nice if it had been flagged for us: "Hey, these updates are failing because the MX is blocking it." It wasn't a huge problem, but there was a loss of our time as well as the fact that the updates didn't get pushed out... It would have been nice if CDO had let us know that that was an issue."

"It would be a better product if it incorporated device control for third-party products easily."

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall. Currently, to use it effectively, one must be specific with the rule set that needs to be set up."

More Cisco Security Cloud Control cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The AWS Firewall Manager is a little on the costly side."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"After our free trial was done we got a subscription for three years and it was under $3,000 or so. It's part of the EA we already paid for, so I don't know what it would be if it was a la carte."

"It's around £500 per unit for a three-year license."

"It is covered under the CIsco Enterprise License Agreement (ELA). So, it is licensed and ours."

"It is about a $100 per year for an ASA 5506 firewall, and from there it keeps going up if you have a bigger box. For example, the 5516 is $200 to $300 per year."

"I work with a lot of clients, and the price or value of the Cisco Defense Orchestrator can vary from one client to another. If you have a lot of Cisco solutions, the price of the Cisco Defense Orchestrator is justified. Whereas if you have some security components from other vendors, such as Check Point or Palo Alto. This solution would be a pretty expensive proposition considering that they don't integrate with them well."

"If you compare to what is available on the market, they are in the same range with respect to pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall. Currently, to use it effectively, one must be specific with the rule set that needs to be set up. Additionally, I suggest impro...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Our primary use case for Cisco Defense Orchestrator is the automation of playbooks. We primarily use it for this purpose to streamline processes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Those who want to use Cisco Defense Orchestrator should build their own use case and see if it fits their environment. The most significant benefit for us is the response time because it automates ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 12% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 20% of the time

AlgoSec vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 17% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiPortal vs Cisco Security Cloud Control

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Security Cloud Control Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

July 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Security Cloud Control

July 2026

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cisco Defense Orchestrator, CDO

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized management, real-time visibility, and AI-driven automation for on-premises and cloud environments, simplifying scalability and deployment.

With a unified approach, Cisco Security Cloud Control enhances security posture by providing cross-platform insights across Cisco's ecosystem. It accelerates threat detection and optimizes policy enforcement through a blend of AI automation and natural language querying capabilities. The intuitive platform serves multiple devices, enabling comprehensive management of Secure Firewall, Secure Access, and other services with guidance from the Cisco AI Assistant. It also includes an AI Operations feature that identifies critical issues and provides real-time insights, enhancing response times while a policy analyzer improves security hygiene by detecting and closing security gaps. Its automation minimizes manual tasks, secures cloud-stored configurations, and supports two-factor authentication. However, it could benefit from improvements in navigation clarity, bulk change handling, and expanded third-party integrations.

What are the key features of Cisco Security Cloud Control?

Centralized Device Control: Streamlines management with bulk policy upgrades and automation.
AI-Driven Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances threat detection.
Network Visibility: Provides insights with valuable reporting and intrusion prevention.
Intuitive Configuration: Enables easy policy adjustments and restoration of secure connections.

What benefits can users anticipate?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces operational overhead with centralized management.
Improved Security: Enhances protection through automated policy enforcement and AI insights.
Time Savings: Simplifies management of multiple devices in cloud and on-premises environments.
Scalability: Supports growth with ease of deployment and policy consistency.

Industries implementing Cisco Security Cloud Control leverage its capabilities for tasks ranging from firewall management to intrusion prevention. Enterprises use it to streamline policy management, automate configurations, and integrate Cisco devices with cloud strategies, benefiting from simplified security orchestration and network segmentation.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Insurance Company of British Columbia, Shawmut

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

June 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.