Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Lambda vs Azure Stream Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Lambda
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Compute Service (1st)
Azure Stream Analytics
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

AWS Lambda and Azure Stream Analytics aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AWS Lambda is designed for Compute Service and holds a mindshare of 21.0%, down 24.9% compared to last year.
Azure Stream Analytics, on the other hand, focuses on Streaming Analytics, holds 11.1% mindshare, down 12.8% since last year.
Compute Service
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Wai L Lin O - PeerSpot reviewer
A serverless solution with easy integration features
We use AWS Lambda because it provides a solution for our needs without requiring us to manage our infrastructure. With the tool, we only pay for the resources we use. Additionally, it is straightforward to implement and integrates with other services like API Gateway. The tool's serverless nature has had the most significant impact on our workflow. I find it particularly attractive because it eliminates the need for managing servers. In my previous experience, managing upgrades and updates was quite challenging. The solution's integration process with other AWS services was relatively easy. We primarily use AWS services such as EventBridge for scheduling processes and log management.
SantiagoCordero - PeerSpot reviewer
Native connectors and integration simplify tasks but portfolio complexity needs addressing
There are too many products in the Azure landscape, which sometimes leads to overlap between them. Microsoft continuously releases new products or solutions, which can be frustrating when determining the appropriate features from one solution over another. A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward. They should simplify their portfolio. The Microsoft licensing system is confusing and not easy to understand, and this is something they should address. In the future, I may stop using Stream Analytics and move to other solutions. I discussed Palantir earlier, which is something I want to explore in depth because it allows me to accomplish more efficiently compared to solely using Azure. Additionally, the vendors should make the solution more user-friendly, incorporating low-code and no-code features. This is something I wish to explore further.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Lambda is itself serverless, and it is connected to the API gateway, and you can directly call the API through the API gateway and connect through AWS Lambda."
"Lambda has improved our organization by making it possible to transform data."
"Provides a good, easy path from when you're using an AWS cluster."
"The most valuable features of AWS Lambda are a serverless and event-driven architecture."
"It enables the launch of thousands of instances simultaneously,"
"AWS Lambda's most valuable feature is serverless architecture."
"The initial setup of AWS Lambda is very straightforward and quick."
"The installation and configuration of the solution is straightforward."
"We use Azure Stream Analytics for simulation and internal activities."
"We find the query editor feature of this solution extremely valuable for our business."
"Any time I needed assistance, they were helpful."
"It provides the capability to streamline multiple output components."
"It's easy to implement and maintain pipelines with minimal complexity."
"The way it organizes data into tables and dashboards is very helpful."
"It's scalable as a cloud product."
"I like all the connected ecosystems of Microsoft, it is really good with other BI tools that are easy to connect."
 

Cons

"Its performance can be improved. There should also be more dynamic security permissions."
"It currently requires manual user maintenance to upgrade and evaluate, and an automated provision for this would be beneficial."
"I wish to see better execution time in the next release."
"I would like to see some better integration with other providers, like Cohesity, Druva, and others. I also think the Lambda interface could be better."
"I would like to see the five zero four AWS Lambda invocation fixed. This is basically a time-out error."
"Security needs to be improved."
"Lamba functions have cold-starts that can cause some delay."
"The product needs some updating as far as ease-of-customization and configuration opportunities to work with solutions outside of the cloud."
"We would like to have centralized platform altogether since we have different kind of options for data ingestion. Sometimes it gets difficult to manage different platforms."
"The solution could be improved by providing better graphics and including support for UI and UX testing."
"Easier scalability and more detailed job monitoring features would be helpful."
"Early in the process, we had some issues with stability."
"There are too many products in the Azure landscape, which sometimes leads to overlap between them."
"I would like to have a contact individual at Microsoft."
"The solution doesn't handle large data packets very efficiently, which could be improved upon."
"Sometimes when we connect Power BI, there is a delay or it throws up some errors, so we're not sure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't need to pay for licensing to use Lambda."
"The price of the solution is reasonable and it is a pay-per-use model. It is very good for cost optimization."
"Price-wise, AWS Lambda is very cheap. It's not free, but it's not that expensive."
"The solution's price is average."
"It costs maybe less than $10 per month in my use case."
"This is a product that is pay-per-use, as opposed to a licensing fee."
"AWS Lambda is a very inexpensive solution. They charge for the number of times we run it. If you run AWS Lambda for one time, they charge around 50 cents or 25 cents for the use. I don't know the exact price, but it's less than a dollar."
"The pricing varies based on the specific solution you're implementing, and in comparison to the value it provides, the overall cost is reasonable."
"We pay approximately $500,000 a year. It's approximately $10,000 a year per license."
"I rate the price of Azure Stream Analytics a four out of five."
"There are different tiers based on retention policies. There are four tiers. The pricing varies based on steaming units and tiers. The standard pricing is $10/hour."
"Azure Stream Analytics is a little bit expensive."
"The current price is substantial."
"The licensing for this product is payable on a 'pay as you go' basis. This means that the cost is only based on data volume, and the frequency that the solution is used."
"The product's price is at par with the other solutions provided by the other cloud service providers in the market."
"The cost of this solution is less than competitors such as Amazon or Google Cloud."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
69%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better, AWS Lambda or Batch?
AWS Lambda is a serverless solution. It doesn’t require any infrastructure, which allows for cost savings. There is no setup process to deal with, as the entire solution is in the cloud. If you use...
What do you like most about AWS Lambda?
The tool scales automatically based on the number of incoming requests.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Lambda?
AWS Lambda is cheaper compared to running an instance continuously. You only pay for what you use, making it cost-effective.
Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?
Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stream Analytics?
When I purchased the product, it was comparable to other Azure products. From my point of view, it should be cheaper now, considering the years since its release. The Azure solution is better now, ...
What needs improvement with Azure Stream Analytics?
There are too many products in the Azure landscape, which sometimes leads to overlap between them. Microsoft continuously releases new products or solutions, which can be frustrating when determini...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ASA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix
Rockwell Automation, Milliman, Honeywell Building Solutions, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Real Madrid C.F., Aerocrine, Ziosk, Tacoma Public Schools, P97 Networks
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Spot by NetApp and others in Compute Service. Updated: February 2025.
842,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.