Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Stream Analytics vs Confluent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Azure Stream Analytics enables effective streaming solutions with positive ROI, rapid deployment, and minimal initial investment using cloud resources.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Azure Stream Analytics provides timely, quality support with varying interaction methods; satisfaction depends on frequency and resource engagement.
Sentiment score
7.0
Confluent's customer service is praised for responsiveness and efficiency, though some users desire improved guidance and best practices.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Azure Stream Analytics efficiently scales for diverse data needs, supporting various enterprises with adaptable, cloud-based performance.
Sentiment score
7.3
Confluent efficiently scales across diverse industries, handling high data volumes, but faces challenges in multi-cloud and scaling down.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Azure Stream Analytics is mostly stable, but concerns exist about resource fine-tuning and occasional issues during complex tasks.
Sentiment score
7.4
Confluent is generally stable with few bugs, but occasional outages occur, especially during Azure integration and maintenance.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Stream Analytics needs better pricing, error handling, integrations, UI, scalability, monitoring, support, and free trial enhancements.
Confluent requires enhanced plugins, usability, integration, security, documentation, cost management, search, governance, and tool expansion for improved user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Azure Stream Analytics offers competitive pricing, though some find it costly; cost optimization is crucial for enterprise use.
Confluent's pricing is seen as high and inflexible, with larger organizations favoring open-source alternatives for cost efficiency.
 

Valuable Features

Azure Stream Analytics provides scalable, cost-effective real-time analytics with seamless integration, IoT support, and user-friendly management and visualization.
Confluent offers scalability, easy navigation, integrations, real-time streaming, customization, and user-friendly management, with strong support and documentation.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Stream Analytics
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Confluent
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Azure Stream Analytics is 12.5%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Confluent is 9.1%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Sudhendra Umarji - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up and user-friendly, but could be priced better
I haven't come across missing items. It does what I need it to do. The pricing is a little bit high. The UI should be a little bit better from a usability perspective. The endpoint, if you are outsourcing to a third party, should have easier APIs. I'd like to have more destination sources available to us.
Gustavo-Barbosa Dos Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming
Implementing Confluent's schema registry has significantly enhanced our organization's data quality assurance. It helps us understand the various requirements of multiple customers and validates the information for different versions. We can automate the tasks using Confluent Kafka. Thus, it guarantees us the data quality and maintains the integrity of message contracts.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?
Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stream Analytics?
Stream Analytics is cheaper, especially for small-scale requirements or telemetry needs. However, for enterprise-level data handling, structured streaming with Databricks might be more cost-effecti...
What needs improvement with Azure Stream Analytics?
More flexibility in terms of writing queries and accommodating additional facilities would be beneficial. The complexity of handling messages that need decoding and contain different characters sho...
What do you like most about Confluent?
I find Confluent's Kafka Connectors and Kafka Streams invaluable for my use cases because they simplify real-time data processing and ETL tasks by providing reliable, pre-packaged connectors and to...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Confluent?
Regarding pricing, I think Confluent is a premium product, but it's hard for me to say definitively if it's overly expensive. We're still trying to understand if the features and reduced maintenanc...
What needs improvement with Confluent?
One area we've identified that could be improved is the governance and access control to the Kafka topics. We've found some limitations, like a threshold of 10,000 rules per cluster, that make it c...
 

Also Known As

ASA
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rockwell Automation, Milliman, Honeywell Building Solutions, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Real Madrid C.F., Aerocrine, Ziosk, Tacoma Public Schools, P97 Networks
ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Stream Analytics vs. Confluent and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.