Axiad Conductor vs Fortinet FortiToken comparison

Axiad and Fortinet are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Axiad is ranked #12 with an average rating of 10.0, while Fortinet is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Axiad holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Fortinet’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axiad users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Axiad Conductor

Read 6 Axiad Conductor reviews

689 Views
148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiToken

Read 29 Fortinet FortiToken reviews

3,905 Views
2,808 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Axiad Conductor

Fortinet FortiToken

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Fortinet FortiToken and Axiad Conductor are products in the authentication and security solutions category. Axiad Conductor has the upper hand in features and long-term investment value, while Fortinet FortiToken stands out in pricing and support.

Features: Fortinet FortiToken is recognized for its strong authentication, seamless integration with Fortinet's security system, and flexibility with both soft and hard tokens. The mobile app enhances the user experience by providing push-button authentication and automatic OTP refresh. Axiad Conductor offers Holistic management with a cloud-based management portal, supporting diverse authentication methods and device lifecycle management, alongside user-friendly enrollment processes like One Click Issuance.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiToken could enhance its feature set beyond basic two-factor authentication and streamline token administration. Broader integration with non-Fortinet systems would also add value. For Axiad Conductor, reducing the complexity in credential deployment and management, offering direct integration with existing PKI systems, and simplifying user management processes would enhance its usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiToken is praised for straightforward deployment and a strong support network that benefits organizations using Fortinet tools. Axiad Conductor offers flexible deployment, excellent customer service, tailored onboarding, and streamlined processes that provide added value to users.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiToken is often seen as cost-effective, particularly for existing Fortinet users, offering solid ROI with competitive pricing. Axiad Conductor, despite higher initial costs, provides substantial long-term ROI through advanced features and scalability, appealing to businesses focused on comprehensive security investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Axiad Conductor vs. Fortinet FortiToken Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Fortinet FortiToken

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axiad Conductor

Ranking in Authentication Systems

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (15th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (14th), Passwordless Authentication (4th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (5th)

Fortinet FortiToken

Ranking in Authentication Systems

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Axiad Conductor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiToken is 6.5%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Eric Brown

Cybersecurity Director - Enterprise Identity & Access Management at SAIC

The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform

The most valuable feature is the overhead management of the platform. There is less for my team to worry about. The day-to-day tasks, running the servers, and making sure that everything is patched is all handled by the platform. We just consume the service and work with them to refine it, making it even more valuable. Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization. One of our requirements to continue some of our contracts is to have multi-factor authentication across all devices accessing the network. It is extremely easy to enroll a user with “One Click Issuance”. I have had very few calls to the service desk regarding enrollment. It takes a couple of minutes to enroll a user with "One Click Issuance". Deploying and managing authenticators is very easy, either done by a mobile application or enrollment of an OTP token. It is very simple. This is important to my userbase, which makes it important to me. Functionality-wise, it is pretty solid.

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Facilitates secure 2FA for admins, facilitates OTP generation, and enhances security

One suggestion is to develop a more user-friendly solution that is cost-effective so that a hardware-based solution can be provided to all users using VPN services or any configuration service requiring confidentiality. This would allow for broader distribution among a larger number of system admins and software engineers, which is currently not feasible with the existing hardware-only approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Aside from Active Directory, anything that is a multi-factor platform is handled through Axiad Cloud. It is critical for helping to enforce usage of authentication devices across our organization."

"The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the updating of their credentials on their private keys. That was the feature we were most interested in and Axiad does an excellent job of it."

"The solution has also saved us time by having end-users troubleshoot issues through the MyCircle feature, and has definitely reduced the efforts of our administrators. It is saving us five to 10 minutes per incident."

"It's very user-friendly. We're issuing YubiKeys for our corporate users and they just plug it in, go to the Axiad Cloud portal, and click the issue button. It's a couple of steps."

"What I have found most valuable is the overall way Axiad listened to our problems and helped us solve them. They provided guidance and expertise, with their experience, that enabled us to be successful in a very challenging space."

"And when it comes to enrolling a user, it's super easy with One Click Issuance... It's so easy now that we can offload the process to our clients who can self-enroll. Previously, we would have to do the enrollment process because it was so complicated."

"The token-based authentication is good and modern aspect."

"Its ease of installation is most valuable. It took me five minutes, and it was up and running. It didn't take me that long. The installation on the cell phones is pretty simple."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its mobile application. It is particularly beneficial as it eliminates the need for hardware management."

"FortiToken is a cost-effective solution compared to other solutions, such as Cisco."

"I would rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. The solution is a smart product that anyone can easily access and manage. The solution is a good product for multi-factor authentication and to secure remote authentication in the corporate environment."

"We like the mobile FortiToken."

"I appreciate that it provides comprehensive security. It is tailored to this specific purpose, and it excels in fulfilling this purpose."

"I believe FortiToken is the simplest to implement."

More Fortinet FortiToken pros

Cons

"I'm looking forward to seeing how they move to FIDO U2F as their primary authentication method across all of their solutions."

"We would prefer that the solution be hosted in Canada because we're a Canadian entity. That would be nice to have. It's not a feature, as such, but it would really make us a lot happier if it could be located in Canada."

"I would like a more modern look to the portal."

"macOS is notoriously ever-evolving and it's difficult to keep pace with it as it pertains to certain kinds of crypto authentication. That's really not even on Axiad. That's a decision by Apple, but it makes it a moving target."

"With their licensing model, it becomes hard to scale. For example, we couldn't roll it out enterprise-wide because if you scale it across more than 100,000 users, the cost becomes too exorbitant."

"There are just some minor tweaks that could be made on the front end. It would be cool to have nicknames for authenticator devices. If you have more than one, it's hard to discern what you have."

"The Fortinet FortiToken server doesn't have centralized integration with other Fortinet tools and third-party tools."

"The tool could be a little cheaper."

"Support is a pain point in Bangladesh because there aren't many experienced Fortinet engineers in this country. It's easier to find one certified in Cisco, Palo Alto, or Juniper."

"It could be integrated better if you could have your FortiToken, and the license would allow you to work across multiple FortiGate solutions."

"The problem is that our customers create budgets annually based on the figures at the beginning of the fiscal year. Our customers get annoyed when the price is adjusted in the middle of the year. I understand that it's a difficult time, and price increases make sense for hardware devices. However, FortiToken is a software product, so it shouldn't be affected by factors like chip shortages or supply chain issues. Software solutions should have more transparent and predictable pricing."

"The solution could introduce a mobile application instead of a physical product."

"It needs a lot of coupling with their other Fortinet products. To implement FortiToken, I most probably need to couple it with FortiAuthenticator for full implementation. An RSA token can be used with many devices, whereas Fortinet FortiToken is always linked to only one FortiGate device. If I want to reuse the token across five or six FortiGates, I would have to get the FortiAuthenticator product. I can't use one token to connect to different FortiGates, and I need to get another product to enable this functionality. They should also improve the support for their mobile client. There should be a more detailed roadmap for the operating systems being supported. Some of our users were using an old iOS iPhone, and they were forced to get a newer phone because FortiToken didn't support that version of iOS. Similarly, there may be a version of Android that is not supported, so the users need to change the phone. This was one of the reasons why our deployment took longer."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

More Fortinet FortiToken cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very cheap on a per-year basis. The cards themselves last about three years and the license is on the order of double-digit dollars per user, and not hundreds of dollars per user, per year."

"Axiad's pricing was what we were expecting. It was at the right spot. They were competitive."

"The pricing is very competitive for what is offered at the level that we need. They are right there with what the industry standards are. They tend to be a little bit less, in terms of cost, when we are talking about security at government standards. So, I would say that they have a slight advantage on cost compared to the industry average. They are the lower cost solution and the best bargain out on the market today."

"Don't just focus on the hardware or software costs of acquiring a solution, but look at it from the perspective that so much of what it takes to run a PKI environment has to do with the people who are running it.... look at the total cost of ownership and not just the cost of acquisition."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the cheapest, and ten is the highest, I rate the pricing an eight."

"I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. We purchased the solution at a reasonable price in 2019."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Fortinet FortiToken is not an expensive solution."

"The platform's licensing cost is reasonable for our organization."

"It is included as part of our firewall license."

"Although the platform is relatively expensive, it offers significant value. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

More Fortinet FortiToken pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axiad Cloud?

The life cycle management of credentials is the aspect that we have found to be the most useful... The differentiator that Axiad provided was the ability to provide users a way to self-serve the up...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axiad Cloud?

Our use case is credential management for one of the business units. Axiad provides credential management for those users, including the creation of new credentials and life cycle management of the...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Axiad Cloud?

You have to understand the number of users and the number of devices that are going to use the solution. I'm saying that because of my experience with the licensing part. That's my one gripe. If yo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiToken?

The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authenticat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiToken?

I do not have any notes for improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiToken?

I am using FortiToken for logging into the Fortinet hardware. I have four FortiGate hardware units. I am connected through a simulator on FortiToken.

See all answers

Comparisons

Venafi vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 41% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 31% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Axiad Conductor

Compared 29% of the time

More Axiad Conductor Competitors

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 18% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 16% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiToken Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor

April 2025

Download Axiad Conductor product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken

April 2025

Download Fortinet FortiToken product report

Also Known As

Axiad Cloud

No data available

Overview

Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.

Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.

What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?

"One Click Issuance": Simplifies user enrollment through easy interface actions.
Multifactor Authentication: Manages critical authentication processes securely.
PKI Support: Facilitates seamless management in PKI environments.
Credential Self-Service: Empowers users to handle updates independently.
Cloud Management: Reduces operational burdens due to its managed environment.

What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?

Efficiency: Streamlined operations boost productivity across large networks.
Flexibility: Adaptability to meet evolving challenges and contract requirements.
User Empowerment: Enables users to manage their credentials autonomously.
Compliance: Supports regulation adherence effortlessly.

In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.

Axiad

As we've seen, passwords alone don't keep unwanted guests out of your network. Password-only authentication has led to security breaches, malware infections, and policy violations. With two-factor authentication, a password is used along with a security token and authentication server to provide far better security. Authorized employees can remotely access company resources safely using a variety of devices, ranging from lpatops to mobile phones.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Buyer's Guide

Axiad Conductor vs. Fortinet FortiToken

April 2025

Free Report: Axiad Conductor vs. Fortinet FortiToken

Find out what your peers are saying about Axiad Conductor vs. Fortinet FortiToken and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axiad Conductor vs. Fortinet FortiToken report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.