Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Microsoft and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Container Security category. Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #25 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in Container Security, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) are two distinct offerings in network visibility and cloud container orchestration. AKS appears to have the upper hand due to its integration with Azure's ecosystem and broader functionality, offering superior value to users.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 provides real-time network visibility, advanced threat detection, and comprehensive security analytics with an intuitive dashboard for in-depth incident insights. AKS features seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, robust container orchestration, automated updates, and scalability, making it pivotal for large, distributed systems.

Room for Improvement: Users of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 suggest enhancements in cloud service integration and more granular customization options. Feedback for AKS highlights a need for improved documentation, better out-of-the-box security features, and a more intuitive learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers straightforward on-premises and cloud deployment models with efficient and supportive customer service. AKS provides streamlined Kubernetes cluster setups with Azure convenience but can pose challenges for newcomers. Azure's customer support receives mixed reviews with some users pointing to a steep onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360’s pricing can be a concern for smaller enterprises, but users recognize substantial ROI through enhanced security and network performance. AKS offers competitive pricing with Azure’s pay-as-you-go model, which users find economical for scaling operations. Despite some initial setup costs, AKS users see favorable ROI due to long-term operational efficiencies provided by Azure integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Andrew W

VP - Information Technology at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues

Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.

Read full review

Raymond De Rooij

Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Scalability and flexibility but needs better support

We are using Azure Kubernetes Service as a customer. I cannot detail all the products and technologies we are using There isn't one specific feature of Azure Kubernetes Service that I can name as most valuable. It's part of a strategic solution yet I don't see an advantage compared to our…

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its performance impact on the systems is low, which means there is a minimal impact on system performance compared to traditional antivirus solutions."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its storyline, which helps trace an event back to its source, like an email or someone clicking on a link."

"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."

"The user-friendliness is the most valuable feature."

"Singularity Cloud Native Security provides us with a platform to scan instances when they are getting created, and the dashboard helps us to identify the critical issues."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our security posture."

"Cloud Native Security offers a valuable tool called an offensive search engine."

"The cooperative nature of SentinelOne has influenced our decision not to shift."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

"The solution's technical support is excellent."

"I don't have to furnish my own infrastructure in order to run containers or Kubernetes."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the diagnostic service."

"The most valuable features of AKS are the full array of capabilities and robust security."

"I found the Helm deployment feature of the solution valuable."

"The integration with Azure's security capabilities is very good. The Azure managed identity and integration with the Azure application gateway for App Ingress are valuable features. Additionally, it is a very stable tool."

"It is easy to maintain the solution."

"AKS as a service is very good when you need to leverage applications or functions with much variability in their usage because you're trying to be as efficient as you can with resources."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

Cons

"While the future roadmap presented by SentinelOne appears promising, I hope the envisioned advancements are realistically achievable and that the gap between current offerings and long-term goals is not too significant."

"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."

"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is an excellent CSPM tool, but its CWPP features need improvement, and there is scope for more application security posture management features."

"I used to work on AWS. At times, I would generate a normal bug in my system, and then I would check PingSafe. The alert used to come after about three and a half hours. It used to take that long to generate the alert about the vulnerability in my system. If a hacker attacks a system and PingSafe takes three to four hours to generate an alert, it will not be beneficial for the company. It would be helpful if we get the alert in five to ten minutes."

"The Kubernetes scanning on the Oracle Cloud needs to be improved. It's on the roadmap. AWS has this capability, but it's unavailable for Oracle Cloud."

"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."

"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

"It just loses out because you have less access to it programmatically, with less technical or customizable access."

"AKS could enhance its functionality by introducing a blueprint feature that streamlines and expedites the process. With a blueprint, users can leverage pre-defined configurations, including some common survey elements, reducing the need for extensive customization and allowing us to focus on our core business activities. Additionally, if the blueprint covers security aspects, it would be greatly beneficial, as it eliminates the need for us to build security expertise from scratch. Currently, we encounter challenges during cloud onboarding, security implementation, and adapting to Kubernetes. Although Microsoft may not consider these as their direct responsibility, providing a blueprint similar to what they offer to developers would be highly advantageous."

"It can be tough to access the servers when onboarding."

"I would like to see Azure implement something like the K9 terminal for interacting with Kubernetes clusters. It's a user-friendly CLI interface."

"There are some limitations with the tutor version, particularly in terms of using a lot of free audio. The private level also has restrictions, limiting the number of audio files you can access to just 50. If you want more, you need to contact support."

"One area that could be improved is the Azure CLI. It would be beneficial if they could abstract some of the complexities related to deployment scripts and make them a part of Azure CLI."

"The solution's cost could be cheaper."

"Unfortunately, when a microservice fails, Azure can take up to 60 seconds to broadcast an alert to the monitoring agents."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cons

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."

"It was reasonable pricing for me."

"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."

"While SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers robust protection, its high cost may be prohibitive for small and medium-sized businesses."

"The pricing is somewhat high compared to other market tools."

"PingSafe is affordable."

"It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market."

"It is cheap."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

"You pay for what you use."

"As you scale your operations, AKS becomes more cost-effective."

"The control plane is free and we only pay for the usage and time."

"The price of AKS is expensive. We pay approximately $10,000 monthly."

"We could spend as little as $25 or $30 a month on Kubernetes Services, compared to the typical $100 a month expenditure for a virtual machine."

"We are facing a significant challenge regarding OEM licensing. The issue arises from the fact that certain licenses required for our own purposes are not provided by Microsoft's licensing. Consequently, we are unsure about the most suitable mobile license provisioning model offered by third-party providers."

"The product is expensive in terms of scalability."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

The documentation could be better. Besides improving the documentation, obtaining a professional or partner specializ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

One improvement I'd like to see is a better user interface for developers, enabling easier operation without relying ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

My primary use case is building and deploying solutions using multiple Azure services. I combine these services to bu...

See all answers

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insight...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and re...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 24% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 20% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 7% of the time

Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 77% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 4% of the time

SUSE Rancher vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 3% of the time

Orca Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 35% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

March 2025

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

April 2025

Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

April 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

PingSafe

No data available

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security protects cloud workloads, offering advanced threat detection and automated response. It integrates seamlessly with cloud environments and secures containerized applications and virtual machines against vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is renowned for its efficiency in mitigating threats in real-time. The platform integrates effortlessly with existing cloud environments, ensuring robust cloud security management with minimal manual intervention. Securing containerized applications and virtual machines, it excels in threat intelligence and endpoint protection. However, improvements are needed in performance during high workload periods, and more integrations with third-party tools and better documentation would be beneficial. Users often find the installation process complex, support response times slow, and the dashboard's navigation unintuitive.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Real-time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats as they occur.
Automated Response: Automatically responds to threats to minimize impact.
Ease of Deployment: Simple setup process with scalable options.
Machine Learning Insights: AI-driven insights enhance threat prevention.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with cloud environments for unified security management.

What are the primary benefits or ROI to expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Threat Mitigation: Improved security against real-time threats.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Automated processes save time and resources.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements.
Centralized Management: Manage security across platforms from a single console.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Provides in-depth analysis and protection.

In specific industries, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is implemented to safeguard critical data and infrastructure. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology depend on its real-time threat detection and automated response to protect sensitive information. Its ability to secure containerized applications and virtual machines is particularly valuable in dynamic environments where rapid scaling is necessary.

SentinelOne

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. It also provides a flexible and open-source environment, allowing developers to use their preferred tools and frameworks. With AKS, organizations can accelerate their application development and deployment processes, while reducing operational overheads.

Microsoft

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

March 2025

Free Report: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.