Microsoft System Center and Azure Monitor compete in the IT monitoring and management space. Azure Monitor seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities, customization options, and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Microsoft System Center offers seamless integration with Microsoft environments, automation, and effective antivirus administration. It includes performance metrics and automated updates. Azure Monitor provides real-time monitoring, integration with Azure DevOps, and extensive customization options. The solution supports multiple environments and offers robust logging capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center needs better integration with non-Microsoft products and simplified installation. Enhancements in UI and support for third-party hypervisors are also needed. Azure Monitor could improve its log query interfaces and visualization. Enhancements in cost transparency and AI features are also necessary, along with better integration with third-party cloud services.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center is suited for on-premises and hybrid environments, often presenting complex deployment challenges. Azure Monitor supports public and private clouds, simplifying deployment. While System Center's support is deemed satisfactory, Azure Monitor's support could be improved in terms of speed and engagement.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center is considered expensive, requiring annual licenses and support contracts, but provides significant ROI through remote support and automation. Azure Monitor uses a pay-as-you-go model, generally being more affordable. However, pricing may vary based on usage, with some potential hidden costs related to data ingestion.
However, the second-line support is good.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
Resource monitoring is essential.
Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.
With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.
Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.
Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.
Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
