BlazeMeter vs Eggplant Performance comparison

Perforce and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. Perforce holds a 7.3% mindshare in PTT, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,205 Views
3,028 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

615 Views
344 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Eggplant Performance

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 5, 2025

BlazeMeter and Eggplant Performance are prominent tools in performance testing. BlazeMeter has a competitive edge with its affordability and customer support, while Eggplant is perceived as more valuable due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: BlazeMeter is notable for its scalable cloud-based solutions, continuous delivery integration, and flexible load testing capabilities. Eggplant Performance provides detailed test automation, powerful modeling features, and robust analytic tools for more intricate environments.

Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance its advanced analytic features and support for complex test environments. It may also benefit from a simplified user interface. Eggplant Performance might improve setup processes and reduce initial costs. Enhancing its interface and customer training resources could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter’s seamless cloud-native deployment and responsive customer service contribute to its ease of use. Eggplant Performance offers customizable deployment for varied infrastructures, although it may involve a more complex setup process. Both emphasize support, with BlazeMeter praised for its rapid deployment.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter features a straightforward subscription model that aids in quick ROI, making it cost-effective for cloud-centric businesses. Though Eggplant Performance might demand higher initial investment, it offers substantial returns with its advanced capabilities, positioning itself as a premium option for detailed insights in testing.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. Eggplant Performance Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,315 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (9th), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (8th), Test Automation Tools (6th)

Eggplant Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 7.3%, down from 15.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Performance is 2.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlazeMeter	7.3%
Eggplant Performance	2.2%
Other	90.5%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The extensibility that the tool offers across environments and teams is valuable."

"The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them."

"The solution’s most valuable feature is the dashboard."

"One key advantage of using BlazeMeter is that it does not require me to manage my own infrastructure."

"BlazeMeter can be used for both API and performance testing, it is a multi-facility tool."

"The most valuable aspect of BlazeMeter is its user-friendly nature, ability to conduct distributed load testing and comprehensive analysis and reporting features. It particularly excels in providing a clear and organized view of load test results."

"The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats."

"With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing."

More BlazeMeter pros

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

Cons

"BlazeMeter needs more granular access control. Currently, BlazeMeter controls everything at a workspace level, so a user can view or modify anything inside that workspace depending on their role. It would be nice if there was a more granular control where you could say, "This person can only do A, B, and C," or, "This user only has access to functional testing. This user only has access to mock services." That feature set doesn't currently exist."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"Lacks an option to include additional users during a test run."

"I believe that data management and test server virtualization are things that Perforce is working on, or should be working on."

"BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for."

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."

"If the solution had better support and the documentation was efficient it would do better in the market."

"BlazeMeter has room for improvement in terms of its integration with GitLab, particularly in the context of CI/CD processes. While it has multiple integrations available, the level of integration with GitLab may need further enhancements. It is known to work well with Git and Jenkins, although the extent of compatibility with GitLab is uncertain."

More BlazeMeter cons

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"The solution is free and open source."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"The pricing is competitive in India."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Retailer

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Performance?

It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Performance?

The pricing is competitive in India.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Performance?

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 10% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 21% of the time

Appium vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

January 2026

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

January 2026

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Cisco

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

December 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. Eggplant Performance

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Eggplant Performance and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. Eggplant Performance report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.