Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs webMethods.io comparison

Boomi and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Boomi is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Boomi holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...

Read 9 Boomi AtomSphere API Management reviews

762 Views
528 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

3,033 Views
2,148 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

webMethods.io and Boomi AtomSphere API Management compete in the area of API management solutions. Boomi AtomSphere often holds a lead due to its extensive feature set and long-term ROI, making it a more attractive option for those seeking depth in features. Meanwhile, webMethods.io is favored for its competitive pricing and support flexibility.

Features: webMethods.io supports seamless integration across various protocols, providing easy setup and connectivity. It offers robust partner integration for B2B communications and a reliable infrastructure allowing quick service development. Boomi AtomSphere is known for advanced monitoring capabilities, detailed analytics for in-depth insights, and a comprehensive management suite for API lifecycle support.

Room for Improvement: webMethods.io could benefit from enhanced API governance controls and a wider range of connectors. Improvement in user interface intuitiveness and advanced analytics could also enhance its offering. Boomi AtomSphere may improve by offering more flexible configuration options for diverse enterprise needs, reducing setup complexity for beginners, and offering more competitive, transparent pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io is praised for its quick deployment and configurable setup options, minimizing downtime. Its customer service is effective and adaptive, often mentioned favorably. Boomi AtomSphere provides structured deployment with useful documentation and strong customer support, leading to positive feedback, which, alongside its solid deployment practices, often gives it an edge.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io offers competitive and flexible pricing structures, providing good ROI for cost-sensitive enterprises. Its model often attracts organizations focusing on budget constraints. On the other hand, Boomi AtomSphere, despite perceived higher setup costs, justifies the investment through a comprehensive feature set leading to significant long-term ROI, appealing to enterprises seeking holistic capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...

Ranking in API Management

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere API Management is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

ShashankRavikumar

Chief Strategy Officer at GWC Data.AI

Enables real-time insights and secure API management for efficient customer interactions

The main improvement needed is the ability to have different base URLs for HTTP and HTTPS for different clients. Currently, I can have only one base URL for one atom. It would help if I could set up a proxy with different URLs within Boomi as a simple configuration instead of needing external applications. Also, Boomi can integrate AI to manage backend loads and provide insights into runtime engine consumption.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is good."

"Boomi allows for more secure URLs and easy customization of HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which I find very beneficial."

"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."

"We can develop almost any interface that we need."

"Integrations take less time."

"The product's stability is good."

"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management pros

"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight."

"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."

"How simple it is to create new solutions."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."

"The product is really complex to manage."

"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."

"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."

"The API management has room for improvement."

"The solution must provide more AI services."

"Scalability is an area where Boomi lacks."

"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management cons

"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."

"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."

"With performance, there is room for improvement in regards to if we would like to put another extra layer of security on it, such as SSL. This is affecting their performance quite significantly. They need to improve the process of managing the SSL and other things inside their solutions, so there will not be quite such a significant impact to the performance."

"The price has room for improvement."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."

"The price is reasonable."

"The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"Its cost depends on the use cases."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere API Management?

Integrations take less time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere API Management?

In terms of pricing, Boomi is expensive for small companies due to its license model. For enterprise companies, it is cheaper than competitors like MuleSoft, as large enterprise accounts have huge ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere API Management?

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 39% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 29% of the time

Apigee vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management

Compared 12% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere API Management

April 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

March 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

Boomi API Management

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Boomi API Management supports the full lifecycle of APIs in a hybrid environment. Configure APIs and expose real-time integrations effortlessly. Centrally test and deploy APIs and enforce contracts and policies with an API gateway. Monitor the health of APIs with usage dashboards and engage API developers using the catalog and developer portal.

Boomi

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Avalara, Cornell University, Dropbox

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.