Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Microsoft Azure API Management comparison

Boomi and Microsoft are both solutions in the API Management category. Boomi is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. Boomi holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to Microsoft’s 18.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...
Read 9 Boomi AtomSphere API Management reviews
  • 762 Views
  • 528 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure API Management
Read 81 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews
  • 24,142 Views
  • 20,248 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Boomi AtomSphere API Management are competing products in the field of API management. Boomi AtomSphere API Management seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features that justify its cost, while Microsoft Azure API Management attracts with competitive pricing and support.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management integrates strongly with other Azure services, offers scalability, and security features. Boomi AtomSphere API Management provides broad integration possibilities, ease of use, and flexible deployment options. A notable feature is Boomi's simplified integration process with various platforms.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management can benefit from simplifying its deployment process and enhancing integration with non-Microsoft services. Improving its user interface and expanding third-party API support would also be advantageous. Boomi AtomSphere API Management could enhance its cost-effectiveness, provide more in-depth documentation, and expand its real-time analytics capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi AtomSphere API Management offers a straightforward deployment model and robust customer support, which simplifies implementation. Microsoft Azure API Management has a more complex deployment process but benefits from Microsoft's extensive support infrastructure and ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management is appealing to budget-conscious users with a more attractive initial setup cost. However, Boomi AtomSphere API Management, despite its higher initial cost, may lead to a better ROI in the long term given its superior feature set and integration capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...
Ranking in API Management
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure API Management
Ranking in API Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere API Management is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 18.5%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

ShashankRavikumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables real-time insights and secure API management for efficient customer interactions
The main improvement needed is the ability to have different base URLs for HTTP and HTTPS for different clients. Currently, I can have only one base URL for one atom. It would help if I could set up a proxy with different URLs within Boomi as a simple configuration instead of needing external applications. Also, Boomi can integrate AI to manage backend loads and provide insights into runtime engine consumption.
Read full review
Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently manages and monetizes API
It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."
"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."
"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."
"Integrations take less time."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The product's stability is good."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."
"We can develop almost any interface that we need."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management pros
"The UI management is very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are the API and integrations."
"Azure API Management is an API gateway that can be used for different purposes, for example, to monetize APIs."
"We're pretty much using all of the monetizations features out of the API manager so we can put up a portal and have a dev portal and then a prod portal and do rate limiting."
"I like API Management's sandbox feature. It's an environment where you can test out the API before putting it into production and connecting it to a live environment."
"Allows the possibility of VPN technology to connect your gateway directly with on-prem services"
"Azure API is scalable."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure API Management are the easy configuration and deployment with automation."
More Microsoft Azure API Management pros
 

Cons

"The product is really complex to manage."
"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."
"The API management has room for improvement."
"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."
"Scalability is an area where Boomi lacks."
"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."
"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management cons
"The licensing part of Microsoft is always higher than other platforms, like Amazon services and other cloud services. Microsoft should work on reducing the cost."
"Other products have more customization options."
"Azure is our most expensive resource; it's costly."
"The integration with other API gateways is where they might try to improve."
"The documentation could be improved for the customer."
"The developer portal can be improved."
"I rate the technical support from Microsoft Azure API Management a four out of five."
"Azure API Management lacks integration capabilities seen in other tools."
More Microsoft Azure API Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."
"The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."
"The price is reasonable."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure API Management is publicly available and goes from a developer edition that costs $26 to $30 per month. It may have changed, but it's in the neighborhood of $30 per month. I believe there's also the enterprise edition, which is highly capable and costs $2,500 per month."
"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."
"Azure is a pay-as-you-go model. You build out your virtual environment and pay a monthly price depending on CPU cores, storage, etc."
"It costs around 30,000 Kronas a month, which translates to about $3,000 dollars monthly."
"It is an expensive solution, but any API solution will be expensive."
"We pay for a yearly license."
"Microsoft is competitively priced."
More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Insurance Company
10%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
Integrations take less time.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
In terms of pricing, Boomi is expensive for small companies due to its license model. For enterprise companies, it is cheaper than competitors like MuleSoft, as large enterprise accounts have huge ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
The main improvement needed is the ability to have different base URLs for HTTP and HTTPS for different clients. Currently, I can have only one base URL for one atom. It would help if I could set u...
See all answers
How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?
Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...
See all answers
Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?
If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?
Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 29% of the time
Apigee vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Apigee vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 20% of the time
Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 12% of the time
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Competitors
Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 44% of the time
Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 21% of the time
IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 6% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 5% of the time
MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management
April 2025
Boomi AtomSphere API Management reportDownload Boomi AtomSphere API Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2025
Microsoft Azure API Management reportDownload Microsoft Azure API Management product report
 

Also Known As

Boomi API Management
Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
 

Overview

Boomi API Management supports the full lifecycle of APIs in a hybrid environment. Configure APIs and expose real-time integrations effortlessly. Centrally test and deploy APIs and enforce contracts and policies with an API gateway. Monitor the health of APIs with usage dashboards and engage API developers using the catalog and developer portal.

Boomi

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?
  • Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
  • Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
  • Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
  • Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
  • Centralized API library simplifies management.
What benefits or ROI should users consider?
  • Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
  • Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
  • Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
  • Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
  • Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Avalara, Cornell University, Dropbox
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2025
Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.