We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere API Management and Microsoft Azure API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."
"We can develop almost any interface that we need."
"The product's stability is good."
"Integrations take less time."
"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."
"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."
"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"I have found this solution to be easy to configure, simple to use, and flexible."
"The ease of use of the solution is excellent."
"I like API Management's ability to do hybrid cloud stuff."
"The package as a whole is useful for our customers."
"Most of the features are valuable to me."
"Easy to integrate API management platform. It is a stable and scalable solution."
"The UI management is very easy to use."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure API Management are the easy configuration and deployment with automation."
"The product is really complex to manage."
"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."
"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."
"The solution must provide more AI services."
"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."
"The API management has room for improvement."
"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."
"If I compare this solution to others I have used in other phases of my life, having APIM being an Azure resource, it is easy to configure and deploy. However, this conversely reduced the flexibility. The difficulty is how do we configure it in a manner that a larger enterprise would probably want it to be. This creates a bit more complexity, working around the constraints of the resource itself. If comparing it to other solutions, it is more of a legacy design with an older approach. The various level components are still around resembling an on-premise type of design similar to other solutions, such as Apigee or Mulesoft. They are still predominantly carrying some legacy design. Which might be suited for organizations where they have a more complex network layout. APIM is easy to deploy, but on the other side of that, it is constrained to how Azure has designed it to be."
"From my understanding, there are some constraints around governance and service-to-service intercommunication managing priorities and our own governance."
"I would like to see more integration with other platforms, as well as increased security."
"This solution is only available as a cloud-based deployment and it would be very helpful to have an on-premises version."
"Technical support could be more helpful and responsive."
"The licensing tiers can be misleading."
"It should be easier to integrate."
"The hybrid part could be improved because API Management is entirely cloud-based, but some of our resources are on-prem, so formatting is an issue. Our goal is dual implementation."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere API Management is ranked 14th in API Management with 8 reviews while Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 68 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere API Management is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere API Management writes "Complex to manage, and the documentation is quite hard to learn, though APIs can be created quickly and easily". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Efficiently manages and monetizes API ". Boomi AtomSphere API Management is most compared with Apigee, Amazon API Gateway and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Gateway Enterprise and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
