Boomi iPaaS vs FME comparison

The compared Boomi and Safe Software solutions aren't in the same category. Boomi is ranked #6 in PaaS , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 9.7% mindshare in the category. Safe Software is ranked #26 in DI , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Safe Software users who would recommend it.

Boomi iPaaS

Read 27 Boomi iPaaS reviews

1,972 Views
1,414 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

FME

Read 5 FME reviews

2,643 Views
1,931 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi iPaaS

FME

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and FME based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi iPaaS vs. FME Report (Updated: January 2023).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS vs. FME

January 2023

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (6th)

FME

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (26th)

Mindshare comparison

Boomi iPaaS and FME aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Boomi iPaaS is designed for Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) and holds a mindshare of 9.7%, up 8.0% compared to last year.
FME, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 1.8% mindshare, up 1.4% since last year.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Eugene Paden

CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Integration solution proves maturity and drives productivity

There are many features we're using. We're starting to do AI now regarding integration with other platforms, focusing on creating integrations. A significant area for improvement is version control. Currently, you develop and cannot properly roll back to a previous version unless you create different versions. With proper version control, you could know which version to revert to and test other versions.

Read full review

Alan Bloor

Geographic Information System Developer at Public Sector

Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high

When I do coding, I think about every single function. Some of these functions can be very elementary, like doing a substring or some capitalization. But FME removes all that coding because it's a transformer, so the time to develop an application to get to a point where you're producing results is decreased massively. It used to take weeks and months to develop software, and now I can use something like FME, and within one day, we get results. We can look at and validate data. We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."

"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."

"It has been a stable product."

"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."

"The platform is user-friendly."

"Boomi iPaaS has substantially reduced operational costs by providing out-of-the-box connectors that expedite the integration process with enterprise systems."

"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."

"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."

More Boomi iPaaS pros

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

Cons

"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."

"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."

"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The product's UI could be more convenient."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."

"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."

"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Boomi iPaaS cons

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

"The pricing is not reasonable at all. It's very high."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is expensive. I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"There could be an easy-to-understand licensing model."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

More Boomi iPaaS pricing and cost advice

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"The product's price is reasonable."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

30%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

Pricing varies and they have changed it over the years. It depends on the company size and the value derived from the platform. While pricing is relative, compared to others, it is favorable. Clien...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?

See all answers

What do you like most about FME?

We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FME?

The pricing is really bad. Last year, they rebranded the whole pricing structure. It used to be moderately priced at about £400 per user per year. Now they've changed the whole thing, and it's expe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with FME?

The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point. There must be a technical or comm...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 24% of the time

webMethods.io vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

AWS Glue vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Boomi iPaaS

Compared 6% of the time

More Boomi iPaaS Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 22% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs FME

Compared 15% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 13% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 7% of the time

Talend Data Management Platform vs FME

Compared 3% of the time

More FME Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS

February 2025

Download Boomi iPaaS product report

Buyer's Guide

FME

February 2025

Download FME product report

Also Known As

Boomi

No data available

Overview

The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

Boomi

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Buyer's Guide

Boomi iPaaS vs. FME

January 2023

Free Report: Boomi iPaaS vs. FME

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. FME and other solutions. Updated: January 2023.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi iPaaS vs. FME report.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.