Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Broadcom and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.6, while Planview is ranked #14. Broadcom holds a 8.8% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Clarity

Read 143 Broadcom Clarity reviews

7,773 Views
3,887 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

1,876 Views
844 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Broadcom Clarity

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Broadcom Clarity and Planview Daptiv compete in the project management software category. Broadcom Clarity has the upper hand with its comprehensive solution for managing complex project portfolios, offering enhanced features and capabilities.

Features: Broadcom Clarity provides extensive functionalities in project management, resource management, portfolio management, financial integration, and robust reporting capabilities. Planview Daptiv focuses on effective project planning and task management with notable strengths in these areas.

Room for Improvement: Broadcom Clarity could enhance its reporting, improve third-party tool integration, and offer a more user-friendly interface. Performance issues at peak times have been noted. Planview Daptiv needs to improve its project planning tools and offer better report customization, along with adding standout features in specific areas for competitive advantage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Broadcom Clarity's availability in both on-premises and cloud options provides deployment flexibility, though technical support feedback is mixed. Planview Daptiv offers easier scalability with its cloud-based deployment. Customer service is praised, although technical support experiences vary.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom Clarity's higher pricing aligns with its comprehensive features, suitable for large-scale implementations where ROI becomes clearer. Licensing complexities can affect costs for enterprises needing full functionality. Planview Daptiv offers a flexible pricing model, cost-effective for simpler needs; however, role-based licensing might lead to higher costs for full permissions.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Clarity vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity vs. Planview Daptiv

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,467 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Clarity

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

143

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (7th)

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Broadcom Clarity is 8.8%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 3.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Broadcom Clarity	8.8%
Planview Daptiv	3.3%
Other	87.9%

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

George Anghelache

Delivery Transformation Lead at Banca Transilvania

Broad perspective on strategic management exists but integration challenges hinder efficiency

The product execution part, such as planning and executing, is done through Atlassian tools, specifically Jira. We wanted to upgrade our ability to understand how all these products and teams are working against strategic goals, tracking expenses and time, but the integration between Broadcom Clarity and Atlassian Jira is very cumbersome and not straightforward. Their integration, even with ConnectALL, is just adequate, but it's never going to be great because they are actively trying to sell Rally. To make Broadcom Clarity a perfect product, I think with Jira, nothing can be done. To be fair, I don't know exactly how Rally integration works as I've only read about it, but I know that in marketing papers, it seems amazing with full-on integration, whereas with Jira, it just doesn't work that effectively.

Read full review

reviewer2068344

Director of Operations at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve

The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance. In a future release, it would be beneficial to have a undo button.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For a very long time, Broadcom Clarity had not developed the old interface that Broadcom no and we were not able to see any new features on the system because of the older UEX. We switched to the new UX at the end of March and it needs some time for the user to react to the new features. But if overall main features are being talked about, the financial part of Clarity is really appreciated."

"Centralization of all projects into one tool using a standardized way of prioritization improved the visibility of current and planned spending against company’s goals and strategies in the portfolio."

"What we find valuable is the ability to bring all the different projects that we have into a central location."

"It helps all the portfolio managers and the program managers to take stock of the financial situation at the program and portfolio level, because it rolls up all the financials at the product level."

"The new UX is great because it has helped remove some of those barriers, so that people who are not classically trained project managers can easily get up to speed in using the tool without having to learn a whole other tool set. It's very intuitive, and very collaborative, and very easy to adapt to their existing work styles."

"Scalability is great, especially with cloud-based solutions, because it makes the product very portable and users can access it on tablets, smartphones, and whatever device they have."

"It is an improvement over using various Microsoft tools, like just spreadsheets and other things, as it is standardizing and expanding its use for the features that help our company."

"The project management part of it is definitely the most valuable part of it to us."

More Broadcom Clarity pros

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

"Changepoint allowed us to model resource request/assignment workflow in our large PS organization."

"The experience with Changepoint has been great considering that most organizations won't use 90% of the application's features."

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The most valuable features are resource allocation and capacity planning."

More Planview Daptiv pros

Cons

"The architecture must be improved."

"The forms (e.g., project properties page) need to be more attractive, colorful, and field more flexibility for validations."

"Their online documentation is okay. It is not great. It is hard to get to some of the answers to the things that we may be running into, such as use cases that we are trying to fix. So, frequently we have to put in tickets."

"Technical support has been average. A lot of times, it takes a couple of days before we even get a decent response, or something that gets us closer."

"Could be using more updated technologies."

"The Latin American support could be better due to the language barrier."

"While I know it is coming in the roadmap, the risks issues and changes on the new UX would be amazing. However, the risks issues and changes are not in the new UX yet."

"The development of third-party items such as Java JDK, Tomcat and browsers is usually so fast that the versions supported by CA PPM are not the most recent ones."

More Broadcom Clarity cons

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions i.e. to Infor ERP, Confluence, ..."

"The previous solution that we were using was Projector PSA; it was overall a superior product."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current."

"The user interface is quirky and does not always conform to the expected Microsoft UI standards."

"Accessing some functions is a bit obscure and requires some knowledge of how the product works, but the upgrade from v2012 to 2014 improved that situation and I expect the upcoming upgrade to 2017 to further streamline operations."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

More Planview Daptiv cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Broadcom Clarity PPM costs us $500K, and that's only for the installation and kick off within the first year. For each succeeding year, it could cost $200K."

"It is a little bit costly compared to others, but it is mature. Customer should understand this product is geared towards project management, not financial management."

"Pricing is flexible, depending on the customer and the region."

"It is hard for them to say, "I have a person on my team who is going to be available, I am going to move that task to them". That requires a project management license, it doesn't require a team member license, so the licensing model does not sometimes support the way the business world is going."

"The price of Broadcom Clarity PPM is reasonable. My customers pay a license to use this solution on an annual basis."

"The price point of Broadcom Clarity PPM is less than Planisware. If a customer comes to me, and the cost is the main parameter for the selection of a tool, then I'll recommend Broadcom because cost-wise, they are less than other solutions."

"The licensing costs are a little bit high, and unfortunately, it has been a while since I've had that paperwork in front of me. I don't remember how much it was, but it seemed like it was fairly high. It is probably comparable to some of the other solutions because I do know that, for example, on a lot of the AWS stuff, they found that the costs wound up being higher than having some on-prem solution. Comparatively, Clarity is within the price range of other solutions."

"The subscription is not that expensive."

More Broadcom Clarity pricing and cost advice

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	117

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Broadcom Clarity PPM?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom Clarity PPM?

The purpose for using Broadcom Clarity is strategic portfolio management, connecting the strategic teams with expenses and linking it to the execution of the product to understand what we're spendi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Broadcom Clarity PPM?

When assessing the flexibility of Broadcom Clarity in adapting to industry-specific requirements, it can do many things, but the biggest challenge is that it has traditional project management impl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Planview Portfolios vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

Planisware vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Portfolio and Project Management vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Broadcom Clarity

Compared 4% of the time

More Broadcom Clarity Competitors

Jira vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

Wrike vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 8% of the time

ITM Platform vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 6% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity

May 2026

Download Broadcom Clarity product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

May 2026

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

Clarity PPM, CA Clarity, CA PPM, CA Clarity PPM

No data available

Overview

Broadcom Clarity is a comprehensive project and portfolio management tool offering global resource management, financial reporting, and customization to meet diverse organizational demands.

Broadcom Clarity provides extensive project management capabilities with modules for task tracking, risk management, and time entry. Its flexibility allows for integration, improving automation and reporting. Despite its strengths, areas like reporting, tool integration, and interface design need enhancements. It aids strategic planning, demand management, and lifecycle management across industries like finance and government.

What are Broadcom Clarity's Key Features?

Project and Portfolio Management: Comprehensive tools for managing projects and portfolios efficiently.
Resource Management: Capabilities for managing resources on a global scale.
Financial Reporting: Robust financial reporting features ensuring transparent budgeting.
Task Tracking and Risk Management: Modules enhancing project transparency and visibility.
Customization: Users can tailor features to fit specific operational requirements.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes, improving time management and resource allocation.
Strategic Planning Support: Assists in effective decision-making through comprehensive planning tools.
Improved Transparency: Increases visibility into project statuses and risks.
Integration Flexibility: Seamless integration with other systems enhances process coherence.
User-Friendly Experience: Intuitive configuration contributes to ease of use.

Companies in the finance, telecommunications, and petrochemical sectors leverage Broadcom Clarity for strategic planning and resource balancing. In government operations, it aids in managing complex project lifecycles and capital budgeting, delivering improved decision-making capabilities.

Broadcom

Planview Daptiv offers robust project management capabilities with a focus on resource allocation, capacity planning, and collaboration.

Planview Daptiv is known for its excellent reporting, flexibility, and no-code functionalities. It includes beneficial portfolio views and comprehensive dashboards while integrating with IBM Cognos for enhanced analytics. The platform's timekeeping feature efficiently records billable hours, and its project boards and task management add significant value. However, improvements are needed in areas like expense management and resource allocation. Some users encounter complex and outdated features. Enhanced security measures, better integrations with tools like ITFM, and improved analytics would boost its utility.

What are the standout features of Planview Daptiv?

Resource Allocation: Efficiently manage and allocate resources across projects.
Capacity Planning: Support project planning and execution with effective capacity planning tools.
Collaboration: Enhance team collaboration through powerful integrated tools.
Reporting: Utilize excellent reporting capabilities for comprehensive insights.
No-code Functionality: Easily create features without special coding skills.

What benefits should users focus on in reviews?

Improved Project Oversight: Centralize project management across multiple scenarios.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined timekeeping and task management processes.
Enhanced Analytics: Benefit from advanced analytics with IBM Cognos integration.
Optimized Resource Use: Make informed decisions with resource allocation and capacity planning.

Organizations use Planview Daptiv in IT and construction projects, multi-project oversight, and comprehensive tracking. Consultancy firms employ it for PSA activities, aiding in the implementation process. It supports new project management offices post-merger for technical tasks, similar to Jira.

Planview

Sample Customers

Toyota Financial Services, GameStop, Polycom, Sky, Qantas, Cox Enterprises, Banco Mercantil, Borealis

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Clarity vs. Planview Daptiv

April 2026

Free Report: Broadcom Clarity vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Clarity vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom Clarity vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.