Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BrowserStack vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

The compared BrowserStack and Tricentis solutions aren't in the same category. BrowserStack is ranked #3 in FT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 12.0% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.
BrowserStack
Read 25 BrowserStack reviews
  • 7,874 Views
  • 6,320 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
TestProject [EOL]
Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews
    71% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and TestProject [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: August 2024).
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    August 2024
    Download the complete report
    Helped 801,394 peers since 2012
     

    Categories and Ranking

    BrowserStack
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    25
    Ranking in other categories
    Functional Testing Tools (3rd), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)
    TestProject [EOL]
    Average Rating
    7.2
    Number of Reviews
    6
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    SB
    Mar 2, 2023
    Great browser testing across platforms but issues with stability
    I mainly use BrowserStack for browser testing BrowserStack has allowed us to do tests to cover criteria we couldn't do previously. BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile. One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have…
    Read full review
    Ashu Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
    Sep 21, 2023
    An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget
    With the solution, I could not only record the scripts but also record and automate the exact manual process with my team, and after that, I automated the entire process to save time and function within a limited budget The most valuable feature of the solution is related to its ability to…
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."
    "The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
    "BrowserStack has lots of devices to choose from."
    "I like that it offers full device capability."
    "The integration is very good."
    "The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."
    "It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."
    "The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."
    More BrowserStack pros
    "The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
    "It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
    "The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
    "The automation and AI are very good."
    "Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
    "Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
     

    Cons

    "We are struggling to do local testing."
    "BrowserStack operates at a slow pace, it could improve by making it faster."
    "Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."
    "There is room for improvement in pricing."
    "It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
    "Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."
    "BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."
    "The solution is slow."
    More BrowserStack cons
    "In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
    "The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
    "Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
    "TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
    "I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
    "We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
    "This solution costs less than competing products."
    "As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."
    "The price of BrowserStack is high."
    "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
    "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
    "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
    "The price is fine."
    "The solution is free."
    "Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Computer Software Company
    16%
    Financial Services Firm
    14%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Retailer
    7%
    Educational Organization
    43%
    Computer Software Company
    10%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Retailer
    6%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
     

    Questions from the Community

    What do you like most about BrowserStack?
    The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?
    My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with BrowserStack?
    I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    See all answers
    What do you like most about TestProject?
    The script-less part of it was good for novice users.
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with TestProject?
    The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool. They went commercial, and most of our work wasn't useful anymore. The support or the transition plans for people who were already using...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for TestProject?
    We have a mobile app that we need to build regression testing packs, and we spent almost a year building quite a few test cases for automated testing on that mobile app so that they can run every d...
    See all answers
     

    Comparisons

    LambdaTest vs BrowserStack Logo
    LambdaTest vs BrowserStack
    Compared 29% of the time
    Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack Logo
    Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack
    Compared 27% of the time
    Perfecto vs BrowserStack Logo
    Perfecto vs BrowserStack
    Compared 23% of the time
    Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack Logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack
    Compared 5% of the time
    CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack Logo
    CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack
    Compared 3% of the time
    More BrowserStack Competitors
    Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL] Logo
    Katalon Studio vs TestProject [EOL]
    Compared 42% of the time
    Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL] Logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs TestProject [EOL]
    Compared 39% of the time
    Testim vs TestProject [EOL] Logo
    Testim vs TestProject [EOL]
    Compared 19% of the time
    More TestProject [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    BrowserStack
    September 2024
    BrowserStack reportDownload BrowserStack product report
    Buyer's Guide
    TestProject [EOL]
    August 2024
    TestProject [EOL] reportDownload TestProject [EOL] product report
     

    Learn More

    BrowserStack
    Tricentis
     

    Overview

    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

    TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

     

    Sample Customers

    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    August 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: August 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.