Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

Broadcom and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Splunk Enterprise Security
Read 301 Splunk Enterprise Security reviews
  • 2,595 Views
  • 2,060 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Splunk Enterprise Security and CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] compete in the enterprise security management category. Based on user reviews, Splunk Enterprise Security seems to have the upper hand due to its robust threat detection and advanced analytics capabilities.

Features: Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive threat detection, advanced analytics, and efficient incident response features. CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] impresses with its integration capabilities, ability to provide real-time operational insights, and reducing resource consumption during deployment.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Enterprise Security could improve in scalability, cost-efficiency, and resource consumption. CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] needs enhancements in documentation, support for complex configurations, and customer service quality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Enterprise Security users report a more streamlined deployment process but face challenges with high resource consumption and less responsive customer service. CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] is less resource-intensive during deployment but criticized for the availability and quality of customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk's setup costs are high but deliver a high ROI due to its robust features and capabilities. CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] has more affordable setup costs but delivers a moderate ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 815,854 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Digital Operational Inte...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk Enterprise Security
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
301
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (1st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (1st), IT Operations Analytics (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1273302 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 5, 2020
Good performance, efficiency, and focuses on monitoring
When you choose a solution, you compare the bad points and the good points with the requirements that are needed. DOI does have some bad points. The real bad part is that it's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud. In the beginning, I first started to check on-premise solutions to integrate in the future with Cloud models. So when we chose DOI, we knew the bad point was its obligation to use the Cloud or the SaaS model. But it's not a bad point now because Cloud and SaaS computing is the future of IT. But it's too early to really know about the security and what the other companies are seeing and changing. Monitoring information is critical for a company - information about the IPs, names that we keep, and some technical information. Also critical is the security of the monitoring itself. Broadcom manages the security of the data well. If you have securable monitoring and your team is already using Century or other products, DOI is not a good choice because DOI is not open-source. DOI is a static solution so you will not have access to the code. It is difficult with Sharepoint, too. If you are not in the habit of managing your static Broadcom relationship, it's not easy. The support is in India and it's already closed by the midday shift. The Broadcom support is very bad. I had a previous integration of Broadcom and their static software. But I was able to manage the support. But for new customers, it's quite difficult to create this relationship. Please keep in mind, Broadcom is a very huge company and when you're small or medium, about 1,000 or so employees, if you don't have the team, monitoring will be difficult. If you start a new company or are a startup, don't use Broadcom software. You don't have the weight to negotiate with Broadcom. It's not a bad point with DOI, just a bad point with the Broadcom relationship. But if you only choose DOI, keep in mind that the product is not only its technical capabilities, but also it's support relationship with the enterprise. We already plan to integrate automatic recognition in future releases. Now we don't use a major part of the automatic recognition. The plan is to create or automatically correct some command execution or re-run of the image and to integrate the VPN. The next step is to use the automatic recognition and to bypass the human intervention and to have automatic intervention of the critical system.
Read full review
Avinash Gopu. - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 1, 2024
Offers good visibility into multiple environments, significantly reduces our alert volume, and speeds up our security investigations
There are limitations with Splunk not detecting all user activity, especially on mainframes and network devices. This is because Splunk relies on agents, which cannot access certain workstations. In these cases, we have to rely on application data. For example, with mainframes, manual reports are generated and sent to Splunk, limiting visibility to what's manually reported. This lack of automation for specific platforms needs improvement from Splunk. Additionally, API access is limited for other applications that rely on API calls and requests. This requires heavy customization on Splunk's end. These are the main challenges we've encountered. Monitoring multiple cloud platforms, like Azure, GCP, and AWS, with Splunk Enterprise Security presents some challenges. While Splunk provides different connectors for each provider, consolidating data from two domains across distinct cloud environments can be complex. However, leveraging pre-built templates and Splunk's data collation capabilities can help overcome these hurdles. Despite initial difficulties, I believe Splunk can effectively address this task, earning it an eight out of ten rating for its multi-cloud monitoring capabilities. While Splunk Enterprise Security offers insider threat detection capabilities, its effectiveness could be enhanced by integrating with additional tools, such as endpoint security solutions. This integrated approach is particularly crucial for financial institutions, which often require dedicated endpoint security teams. While using multiple tools is valuable, further improvements within Splunk itself are also necessary. Considering both external integration and internal development, I would rate its current insider threat detection capabilities as three out of ten. Threat detection is where Splunk falls behind. While it offers tools, other use cases require additional work. PAM is an enterprise tool that centralizes information about users, servers, and everything else. It needs real-time monitoring, which I haven't seen in any of the companies I've worked for. They only rely on Splunk for alerting, but real-time monitoring should be handled by the endpoint security team's tools. This means there's no detection or analysis at the machine or endpoint level. Additionally, threat analysis reporting is also absent.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The features that I have found most valuable are the machine learning and the algorithm. We tried seven solutions. The good points of DOI are performance and efficiency under machine learning systems."
"Splunk is extremely flexible, which allows us to create custom visualizations along with other customizations."
"Our clients use the solution to find any threats or vulnerabilities inside their environment."
"It definitely does help with both auditing and as well as regular monitoring. SOC does more monitoring, but ES also gives you other features that are auditing-related. The dashboards are also beneficial."
"The solution has proven to be quite stable."
"The correlation searches are most valuable just because we are able to do things like RBA."
"It helps us uncover bottlenecks in the network."
"It's the completeness of the solution that we like the most."
"The technical support has been very good. They are very responsive and have been helpful."
More Splunk Enterprise Security pros
 

Cons

"It's impossible to be integrated on-premise. Broadcom chose to build only on the Cloud."
"Its interface and usability can always be improved."
"Its user interface for everything other than the charts can be improved. Some parts of it can be simplified a bit, such as when importing documents that have the network traffic. When you're going through the information about the network traffic, you have to have the expertise, but even if a program is supposed to be for IT support, it is good to make it user-friendly because it gets easier to train people. When something goes wrong, the more difficult a program is in terms of UI, the harder it is to fix the issue."
"Splunk's ability to analyze malicious activities scores an 8 out of 10, but there's room for improvement. By analyzing emerging patterns, Splunk could identify and predict potential threats more effectively."
"The solution could improve by giving more email details."
"The product could be cheaper."
"Splunk has a steeper learning curve, making it feel less user-friendly."
"Some of the queries are difficult to run and have room for improvement."
"I'd say I am happy with the technical support, not elated. They provide great support, but sometimes they don't have the answers that I need."
More Splunk Enterprise Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Splunk Enterprise Security's pricing is competitive."
"It is expensive. I used to buy it early on, but then they combined it into a higher-up organization. They buy it for multiple systems now. Last time, I paid around 60K for it. There is just the licensing fee. That's all."
"The price of Splunk is too high for our market."
"It can be cost-prohibitive when you start to scale and have terabytes of data. Its cost model is based on how much data it processes a day. If they're able to create scaled-down niche or custom package offerings, it may help with the cost. Instead of the full-blown features, if they can narrow the scope where it can only be used for a specific purpose, it would kind of create that market for the product, and it may help with the costing. When you start using it as a central aggregator and you're pumping tons of logs at it, pretty soon, you'll start hitting your cap on what it can process a day. Once you've got that, you're kind of defeating the purpose because you're going to have to scale back."
"The pricing model is expensive and a nightmare based on the amount of data."
"Unlike other security tools, Splunk provides a fixed amount of gigabytes per day, and we are required to pay for any additional usage beyond that limit, in addition to our monthly cost."
"Splunk should be able to integrate with other product using the free version."
"The variables and the flexibility that Splunk provides are helpful, especially in a hybrid and multi-cloud environment."
More Splunk Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
See all answers
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 11% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 9% of the time
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 8% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 4% of the time
AppDynamics vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AppDynamics vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
November 2024
CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] reportDownload CA Digital Operational Intelligence [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Enterprise Security
October 2024
Splunk Enterprise Security reportDownload Splunk Enterprise Security product report
 

Learn More

Broadcom
Splunk
 

Overview

CA Digital Operational Intelligence enables IT operations teams to make smarter, faster decisions for enhancing user experience and improving IT service quality and capacity through cross-domain contextual intelligence. Built on an open, powerful engine, it is the leading advanced analytics solution in the market that provides users with comprehensive insights by ingesting and analyzing a diverse data set including metric, topology, text and log data. The machine learning–driven analytics, along with out-of-the-box visualization and correlation, helps drive a superior user experience and deliver significant operational efficiencies.

Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.

Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.

What are the key features?
  • Comprehensive Dashboards: Provide a holistic view of security operations.
  • Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports various data sources for better analysis.
  • Robust Log Aggregation: Centralizes log management for easier monitoring.
  • Machine Learning Toolkit: Enhances threat detection and prediction capabilities.
  • SIEM Capabilities: Integrates security information and event management.
  • Threat Intelligence: Utilizes external information to improve security measures.
  • Risk-Based Alerting: Prioritizes alerts based on the risk they pose.
  • Correlation Searches: Identifies and correlates security events effectively.
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
  • Enhanced Visibility: Improves monitoring across endpoints, networks, and users.
  • Faster Incident Response: Speeds up identification and resolution of security issues.
  • Reduced Alert Volumes: Lowers false positives and enhances signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing and changing security needs.
  • Improved Security Operations: Integrates multiple security facets into one platform.

Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
Buyer's Guide
IT Operations Analytics
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, Devo and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.