CA Unified Communications Monitor vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Broadcom and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #102, while BlueCat is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

181 Views
135 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,355 Views
983 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

LiveAction LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and LiveAction LiveNX compete in the network monitoring and management category. LiveAction LiveNX appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features despite CA Unified Communications Monitor's favorable pricing and support.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities for voice and video traffic, making it valuable for communication tracking. It includes efficient alert systems, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration with existing communication platforms. LiveAction LiveNX offers deep visibility into network performance with advanced analytics, visualization tools, and automated network configuration. It enables real-time monitoring, extensive protocol support, and integration capabilities across various platforms.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from a more intuitive user interface, quicker deployment setup, and enhanced analytics tools for greater insights. It also needs improved interoperability with third-party applications. LiveAction LiveNX would improve with a simplified licensing model, expanded scalability for larger networks, and more affordable maintenance options. Enhanced reporting features could also add value to its current offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAction LiveNX is recognized for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer service. Its simplified processes make setup easy and fast. CA Unified Communications Monitor, while requiring more time for setup with complex configurations, provides better post-deployment support, offering extensive assistance once deployed.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor presents a lower initial cost, attracting budget-conscious organizations. It offers reliable ROI with its affordable pricing and effective support. LiveAction LiveNX involves a higher initial investment, delivering enhanced ROI through superior features and performance. Its advanced capabilities justify the premium pricing by optimizing network efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,646 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

102nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

71st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

50th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's very expensive."

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 23% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 17% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

LiveNX

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,646 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.