Carbonite Server vs Cohesity Data Cloud comparison

OpenText and Cohesity are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0, while Cohesity is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.7. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to Cohesity’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cohesity users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,029 Views
857 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cohesity Data Cloud

Read 8 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews

432 Views
261 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Cohesity Data Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Carbonite Server and Cohesity Data Cloud are prominent solutions for data protection and management. Users are more satisfied with the overall performance and features of Cohesity Data Cloud despite its pricing, indicating its superior value.

Features:Carbonite Server users highlight automatic backup, recovery features, and ease of use. Cohesity Data Cloud offers integrated data management, scalability, and comprehensive features appealing to enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement:Carbonite Server users note the need for better large-file handling capabilities, more flexible scheduling, and improved reporting. Cohesity Data Cloud users suggest improvements in indexing speed, GUI responsiveness, and data restoration times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Carbonite Server deployment is straightforward and supported by responsive customer service. Cohesity Data Cloud's deployment process involves more initial setup time but is balanced by strong customer service. Both products receive positive feedback, though Cohesity may involve a steeper learning curve.

Pricing and ROI:Carbonite Server is praised for reasonable initial setup costs and satisfactory ROI. Cohesity Data Cloud has higher setup costs but is deemed worth the investment due to its extensive features and robust returns. Users feel the ROI justifies Cohesity’s higher expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Cohesity Data Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

31st

Ranking in Cloud Backup

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cohesity Data Cloud

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

40th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

34th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Dale Dirkes

President at DIAD Consulting, Inc.

A simple, efficient, reliable product

The efficiency and convenience are excellent. The pricing is very good. It shows you what has been updated via little green dots. The solution is very automatic. I don't have to worry about it. It was easy to set up. Technical support has been helpful in the past. The solution has been problem-free.

Read full review

AmarpreetSingh

Technical Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI

The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

More Carbonite Server pros

"I rate the Cohesity Data Cloud solution a ten out of ten. It's an easy-to-use product that provides substantial value and security."

"The hyper-converged architecture and scalability are hugely important for growing service companies."

"We use Cohesity Helios primarily in our data management strategy for backup and reporting."

"The clone feature is very nice. You can restore workloads onto Cohesity's storage, which is also nice to have when you don't have enough space to restore on the server."

"It is easy to install and use."

"It's very regimented and fast. It does local backup, cloud backup, long-term coverage, and disaster recovery."

"I definitely recommend this tool to others due to its simplicity, security, features, and flexibility."

"I find the most important feature to be data protection."

More Cohesity Data Cloud pros

Cons

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth."

"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."

"Their documentation portal is not up to date for newer releases and I strongly recommend Cohesity to increase their efforts on the documentation portal."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"The limitation that I see in Cohesity is that the minimum sized node is 36 terabytes, which is more than a small customer needs."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

More Cohesity Data Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"It's priced properly for the market."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Carbonite Server?

I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Server?

The pricing is quite reasonable. I'd rate the affordability nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Server?

The ability to perform instant recovery would be a game changer. For a large user base, the creation of user accounts at this time is a little cumbersome, there isn't any Single-Sign-On (SSO) integ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?

While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 35% of the time

Zerto vs Carbonite Server

Compared 27% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Carbonite Server

Compared 11% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 20% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Rubrik vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

April 2025

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud

April 2025

Download Cohesity Data Cloud product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Cohesity Data Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Cohesity Data Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Cohesity Data Cloud report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.