Carbonite Server vs N2WS Backup & Recovery comparison

OpenText and N2WS are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0, while N2WS is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to N2WS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N2WS users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,029 Views
857 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N2WS Backup & Recovery

Read 8 N2WS Backup & Recovery reviews

315 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

N2WS Backup & Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Carbonite Server and N2WS Backup & Recovery are two prominent solutions for data backup and recovery. N2WS Backup & Recovery has an edge in several areas, making it a superior choice despite its higher pricing.

Features: Carbonite Server users value its automatic cloud backup, easy retrieval process, and user-friendly interface. N2WS Backup & Recovery stands out with its native AWS integration, efficient snapshot management, and comprehensive data protection features.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server needs faster recovery times, improved support for non-cloud environments, and enhanced reporting capabilities. N2WS Backup & Recovery users seek more intuitive configurations, better cost control, and reduced complexity in setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server is praised for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer support. N2WS Backup & Recovery offers detailed guidance and responsive support, particularly within AWS environments.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server is viewed as cost-effective with satisfactory ROI for small to medium businesses. N2WS Backup & Recovery, though more expensive, justifies its cost with robust features and tighter AWS integration, leading to higher perceived ROI among its users.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

31st

Ranking in Cloud Backup

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N2WS Backup & Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

43rd

Ranking in Cloud Backup

31st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N2WS Backup & Recovery is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Dale Dirkes

President at DIAD Consulting, Inc.

A simple, efficient, reliable product

The efficiency and convenience are excellent. The pricing is very good. It shows you what has been updated via little green dots. The solution is very automatic. I don't have to worry about it. It was easy to set up. Technical support has been helpful in the past. The solution has been problem-free.

Read full review

Cezar Ashkar

Cloud Engineer at Digico Solutions

Easy to use and setup

One valuable feature is the easy-to-use GUI There is room for improvement in stability. I have been using this solution for a few months. We currently use the latest version. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It is a scalable solution. The technical support of N2WS has an…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The backup and restore functionality is very easy to use and manage."

"The backup and recovery are the most valuable features. So, our developers can work with confidence."

"The product is successful with the SMB market."

"The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost."

"Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads."

"N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances."

Cons

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."

"Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud."

"The GUI has room for improvement."

"The GUI could be slightly improved."

"It's a global feature that the customer thinks they don't have enough tools to manage, to copy, to delay, and to classify the object file in the backup directory. So they need more tools to manage files in object directory."

"The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want."

"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Carbonite Server?

I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Server?

The pricing is quite reasonable. I'd rate the affordability nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Server?

The ability to perform instant recovery would be a game changer. For a large user base, the creation of user accounts at this time is a little cumbersome, there isn't any Single-Sign-On (SSO) integ...

See all answers

What do you like most about N2WS Backup & Recovery?

N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

I used the free version. I don't have much experience with the paid version. But I'm trying to compare the pricing between different options.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

N2WS Backup & Recovery efficiently takes cloud backups on EC2 instances. The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 35% of the time

Zerto vs Carbonite Server

Compared 27% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Carbonite Server

Compared 11% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 28% of the time

AWS Backup vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 27% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Eon.io vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

Rubrik vs N2WS Backup & Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

More N2WS Backup & Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

April 2025

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

April 2025

Download N2WS Backup & Recovery product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

N2WS Cloud Protection Manager

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

N2WS Backup & Recovery is a comprehensive backup and recovery solution designed to protect critical data and applications in the cloud. The solution is highly regarded for its ease of use, making it a popular choice for organizations of all sizes. With its help, users can easily manage backups, schedule backups, and restore data and applications with just a few clicks.

N2WS Backup & Recovery also has a range of advanced features, including automated backup policies, cross-region replication, and disaster recovery capabilities.

N2WS

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Coca-Cola, tecRacer, Cloudar, Goodwill

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery

April 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. N2WS Backup & Recovery report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.