Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Caspio vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
QuickBase support is efficient, communicative, and responsive, though complex issues may require extra payment, offering valuable technical assistance.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.7
QuickBase users need faster enhancements, a modern UI, improved reporting, seamless integrations, better visualization, and more user-friendly operations.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
QuickBase is scalable and reliable, supporting diverse roles and departments, with users rating its scalability between seven and nine.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
QuickBase pricing is about $300 per license, with enterprise costs around $18,000/year for ten seats and additional data volume charges.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.4
QuickBase is praised for stability and reliability with minor performance issues, averaging user ratings between seven and ten.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
QuickBase provides no-code app creation, real-time updates, automation, SQL-like linking, and dynamic forms, enhancing efficiency for midsize companies.
 

Categories and Ranking

Caspio
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
29th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
27th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QuickBase
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
16th
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Employee Time Tracking Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Caspio is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Timothy Soares - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a good solution for those with limited coding experience
The visualization of the data pages could be improved. You have to a lot of tweaking to make the visualization stand out. It's basic, but there are a lot of options. So you really have to do a lot of customizing on that part. They could add some templates that are more attractive than the basic ones. It would be helpful if you could start with something that's already built rather than working on standard templates from scratch.
Daniel Ream - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable
I would highly recommend working closely with QuickBase and taking advantage of their subcontractors who specialize in building QuickBase apps. QuickBase does a great job of connecting potential users with these subcontractors. However, I would also advise tempering expectations and being aware that building and customizing applications in QuickBase takes time. It is a user-driven platform, so it requires investment and effort to create meaningful solutions. I would rate QuickBase a ten out of ten. I believe that if implemented properly, QuickBase can provide immense value to any organization. It can be used for various purposes such as managing purchase orders, tracking change orders, and monitoring project metrics. By using QuickBase as a central hub, it becomes a reliable and trustworthy source for project-related information. This ability to consolidate and organize data makes it an invaluable tool. Moreover, any solution that helps transform information from individual knowledge into a structured database is undoubtedly a worthwhile investment.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Educational Organization
11%
Insurance Company
11%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
73%
Computer Software Company
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you r...
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have incr...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Florida Department of Health, AdvanceKentucky, Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE), Philips, Comcast, Coca Cola, HP, Whirlpool, Verizon, Lenovo, Yale University
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.