Cassandra vs MarkLogic comparison

Apache and Progress Software are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1, while Progress Software is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Apache holds a 7.9% mindshare in ND, compared to Progress Software’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Cassandra

Read 25 Cassandra reviews

2,307 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

MarkLogic

Read 4 MarkLogic reviews

489 Views
421 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cassandra

MarkLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Cassandra and MarkLogic are leading database solutions, competing in the database technology category. Cassandra seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cost-effectiveness, while MarkLogic offers superior data integration and management features.

Features: Cassandra's strengths lie in scalability, fault tolerance, and real-time processing, which suit distributed systems handling large datasets. MarkLogic offers advanced querying capabilities, support for semantics, and multi-model data integration, providing an edge for complex data operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MarkLogic offers flexible deployment options with robust customer support, simplifying integration into complex IT environments. Cassandra, with its open-source roots, presents more deployment challenges but benefits from a community-driven support network, while MarkLogic’s structured support can simplify implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Cassandra offers lower initial costs due to its open-source model, providing a cost-effective scalable solution. MarkLogic, despite higher setup costs, emphasizes data security and management, leading to potentially higher ROI for enterprises requiring sophisticated operations and comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed Cassandra vs. MarkLogic Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra vs. MarkLogic

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,455 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cassandra

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (14th)

MarkLogic

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Cassandra is 7.9%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MarkLogic is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cassandra	7.9%
MarkLogic	2.2%
Other	89.9%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan

Head, Data Integration & Management at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees

Has maintained secure document storage and efficient data distribution with peer-to-peer architecture

The functions or features in Cassandra that I have found most valuable are that it is a distributed system similar to Mongo. It's good enough for comparison with another SQL database, so it's smooth and organized for distributed database system. The peer-to-peer architecture in Cassandra is helpful for network decentralization, and I have already introduced that feature. Cassandra features in peer-to-peer as well as another monitoring, so basically, it's good enough for our service. The tunable consistency level in Cassandra is good, and we are using that feature already. In terms of built-in caching and lightweight transactions in Cassandra, the transaction level is good, and it's optimized, so there are no more issues in that database. Based on my experience, Cassandra is good for document management system, as well as distributed database system, and the automatic recovery process is there. Additionally, the database monitoring system or auditing system is well-comparable with other database systems, so we are actually happy to be using this Cassandra database.

Read full review

Dixit Singla

Staff Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Search workflows have become faster for complex data while cloud-native flexibility still needs work

I think MarkLogic can be improved by providing good cloud infrastructure. Since we are in a very tech era, MarkLogic should provide good cloud infrastructure. If you look at other databases or systems like Kafka and MongoDB, they have cloud infrastructure. You do not need to worry about maintaining your own servers or provisioning your own servers. You simply log in and tell MarkLogic you want a certain number of clusters or nodes in a cluster and what cloud provider you want to use, then click okay, and they will build it for you. That is a headache with MarkLogic. Apart from that, I don't see any issues. It is a really great product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I would rate Cassandra as nine because of its fast writes, which really suit our use cases mostly."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."

"I am satisfied with the performance."

"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."

"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."

"The most valuable features of Cassandra are its scaling capabilities and its non-SQL nature capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."

"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."

More Cassandra pros

"We moved to MarkLogic and created the API using JavaScript server-side language, and we saw almost 60% improvement in the speed of the search."

"MarkLogic has positively impacted my organization by making everything quick and fast, and I believe that is a major change we have seen here."

"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."

"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."

Cons

"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."

"The solution is limited to a linear performance."

"Interface is not user friendly."

"We experience configuration issues when accommodating the volumes we require, which often necessitates consultation with the Cassandra development team."

"Cassandra is very complex to manage. Sometimes, I need to involve a senior DevOps engineer if we encounter a problem."

"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."

"I want Cassandra to update its open-source version more quickly. It's already feature-rich, but I'd appreciate better integration with other NoSQL databases like MariaDB or MongoDB. If I ever need to work with customers or vendors using different NoSQL databases, having native integration in Cassandra would make managing and interacting with their databases much easier."

"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."

More Cassandra cons

"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."

"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."

"MarkLogic's scalability is very bad. In production, when you get to know that your data is increasing and you need to add one more node, that is not easy and not straightforward."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"We pay for a license."

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"MarkLogic is a pricey option, but there are some advantages to its pricing structure. For medium-sized clients or departments within larger companies, it is possible to obtain a license for one or two nodes for less than a hundred thousand dollars. Additionally, if you only need to deploy a single node, you can do so for under fifty thousand dollars. This is in contrast to other high-quality software options that are only accessible to larger businesses, where the starting price can be upwards of two hundred thousand dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cassandra?

The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-ti...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cassandra?

The pricing for Cassandra is a little bit high, so it would be better for our community services if they consider community pricing for any non-profit organization like an NGO or other things. It w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cassandra?

Regarding areas of improvement for Cassandra, currently, we are not facing significant issues. Some issues arise from our vendors like Apache slowness and distribution or load balancing from HAProx...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MarkLogic?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find it quite high compared to other things, but I believe it is justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MarkLogic?

As for areas where MarkLogic can be improved, nothing else comes to mind. I have been using MarkLogic for seven years, and many improvements have already been addressed. I do not recall any additio...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MarkLogic?

My main use case for MarkLogic is data development. We have a banking type of data, so we used to convert it to PDF or use some for applications we were running. A quick, specific example of how I ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ClickHouse vs Cassandra

Compared 11% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Cassandra

Compared 11% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Cassandra

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle NoSQL vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Cassandra

Compared 5% of the time

More Cassandra Competitors

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs MarkLogic

Compared 24% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs MarkLogic

Compared 19% of the time

SingleStore vs MarkLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MarkLogic

Compared 12% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs MarkLogic

Compared 10% of the time

More MarkLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra

January 2026

Download Cassandra product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

January 2026

Download MarkLogic product report

Overview

Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing.

It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model.

It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

Apache

MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).

Progress Software

Sample Customers

1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota

ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, Lagardre Active, RSuite CMS, Wiley

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra vs. MarkLogic

December 2025

Free Report: Cassandra vs. MarkLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. MarkLogic and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cassandra vs. MarkLogic report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.