Cassandra vs MarkLogic comparison

Apache and Progress Software are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Apache is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2, while Progress Software is ranked #19. Apache holds a 8.5% mindshare in ND, compared to Progress Software’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Cassandra

Read 25 Cassandra reviews

2,030 Views
1,421 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

MarkLogic

Read 2 MarkLogic reviews

346 Views
311 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cassandra

MarkLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Cassandra and MarkLogic are leading database solutions, competing in the database technology category. Cassandra seems to have the upper hand in scalability and cost-effectiveness, while MarkLogic offers superior data integration and management features.

Features: Cassandra's strengths lie in scalability, fault tolerance, and real-time processing, which suit distributed systems handling large datasets. MarkLogic offers advanced querying capabilities, support for semantics, and multi-model data integration, providing an edge for complex data operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MarkLogic offers flexible deployment options with robust customer support, simplifying integration into complex IT environments. Cassandra, with its open-source roots, presents more deployment challenges but benefits from a community-driven support network, while MarkLogic’s structured support can simplify implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Cassandra offers lower initial costs due to its open-source model, providing a cost-effective scalable solution. MarkLogic, despite higher setup costs, emphasizes data security and management, leading to potentially higher ROI for enterprises requiring sophisticated operations and comprehensive security.

To learn more, read our detailed Cassandra vs. MarkLogic Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra vs. MarkLogic

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cassandra

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (14th)

MarkLogic

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

19th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Cassandra is 8.5%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MarkLogic is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cassandra	8.5%
MarkLogic	2.0%
Other	89.5%

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan

Head, Data Integration & Management at a non-profit with 10,001+ employees

Has maintained secure document storage and efficient data distribution with peer-to-peer architecture

The functions or features in Cassandra that I have found most valuable are that it is a distributed system similar to Mongo. It's good enough for comparison with another SQL database, so it's smooth and organized for distributed database system. The peer-to-peer architecture in Cassandra is helpful for network decentralization, and I have already introduced that feature. Cassandra features in peer-to-peer as well as another monitoring, so basically, it's good enough for our service. The tunable consistency level in Cassandra is good, and we are using that feature already. In terms of built-in caching and lightweight transactions in Cassandra, the transaction level is good, and it's optimized, so there are no more issues in that database. Based on my experience, Cassandra is good for document management system, as well as distributed database system, and the automatic recovery process is there. Additionally, the database monitoring system or auditing system is well-comparable with other database systems, so we are actually happy to be using this Cassandra database.

Read full review

Beverly R. Jamison

IT Solutions Architect / Computer Scientist at Practical Semantics

Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support

MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added. The solution has been good at providing the updates that were what we were hoping for. They frequently update the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Based on my experience, Cassandra is good for document management system, as well as distributed database system, and the automatic recovery process is there."

"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."

"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."

"The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount."

"The technical evaluation is very good."

"Its retrieval is similar to an RDBMS, so our team finds it easy to adapt."

"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."

"The solution's database capabilities are very good."

More Cassandra pros

"The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."

"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added."

Cons

"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."

"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."

"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."

"Cassandra is very complex to manage. Sometimes, I need to involve a senior DevOps engineer if we encounter a problem."

"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."

"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."

"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."

"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."

More Cassandra cons

"One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."

"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"We pay for a license."

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"MarkLogic is a pricey option, but there are some advantages to its pricing structure. For medium-sized clients or departments within larger companies, it is possible to obtain a license for one or two nodes for less than a hundred thousand dollars. Additionally, if you only need to deploy a single node, you can do so for under fifty thousand dollars. This is in contrast to other high-quality software options that are only accessible to larger businesses, where the starting price can be upwards of two hundred thousand dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cassandra?

The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-ti...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cassandra?

We are using Cassandra locally and as open-source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cassandra?

While Cassandra can handle NoSQL, I think there should be more flexibility for whole schema design when data is stored in wide columns. Additionally, I believe that eventual consistency should be e...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Cassandra

Compared 15% of the time

ClickHouse vs Cassandra

Compared 13% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs Cassandra

Compared 11% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Cassandra

Compared 8% of the time

InfluxDB vs Cassandra

Compared 6% of the time

More Cassandra Competitors

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs MarkLogic

Compared 49% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs MarkLogic

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MarkLogic

Compared 16% of the time

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs MarkLogic

Compared 13% of the time

More MarkLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra

November 2025

Download Cassandra product report

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

October 2025

Download MarkLogic product report

Overview

Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing.

It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model.

It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

Apache

MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).

Progress Software

Sample Customers

1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota

ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, Lagardre Active, RSuite CMS, Wiley

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra vs. MarkLogic

September 2025

Free Report: Cassandra vs. MarkLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. MarkLogic and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cassandra vs. MarkLogic report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.